Profile of Vipper

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: [Winter Balance Update] SOV Feedback29 Nov 2020, 16:12 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Nov 2020, 15:54 PMSander93 .... The range on the flame 251 is already only 30, I don't think we can make it any lower than that without butchering it. Once more removed DOT from flamer vehicles and add it an ability that would solve most issues with these vehicles. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] SOV Feedback29 Nov 2020, 16:08 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Nov 2020, 15:17 PMSander93 We're thinking about giving Penals 3x PTRS or reducing aim time, and letting PTRS attack ground. What would be the point of attack ground without a projectile? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] OST Feedback29 Nov 2020, 16:03 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Nov 2020, 15:26 PMTickTack Explain how you think these stats make panther accuracy 'worse' than the SU85. Without being utterly subjective. Think it obvious but since you ask for help: Far 0.045>0.0.4 (it also 60 vs 50 even more accurate) Mid for SU-85 is 30 for panther is 25 so Su-85 is more accurate at 25 than Panther. Close Panther is superior but that is at range 0 where the projectile will collide anyway so practically no difference. Can we go back to providing actual feedback instead of this non constructive posts? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] UKF Feedback29 Nov 2020, 15:59 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Nov 2020, 22:15 PMmiragefla The UI could be touched up. It seems we forgot to mention those rounds are essentially 120mm Soviet Mortar rounds. Will be sure to touch that up soon. Think it would be a better idea to make the two mortars different weapons. That could help so that the 2 mortar do not fire simultaneously and thus be one of the few support weapons that "one shoot" enemy squad. The original design of the mortar had 2 types of munitions anyway. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] UKF Feedback29 Nov 2020, 15:25 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Nov 2020, 15:20 PMgeneral_gawain Just won't get between Katitof and you, You are not he has not interest in providing any feedback since he does not play the game and just likes to troll. Jump back to quoted post29 Nov 2020, 15:20 PMgeneral_gawain but T1 Penals with Flamer were in a completely different time frame. Yeah, they were an issue. But thats absolutely not comparable or scaleable: Different factions and early vs late... My suggestion test flamer Ro. e in game. As for penal comparison it non constructive but if you want to make it: Ro. e: cost only 210 and are dirty cheap to reinforce start with 0.9 size and up with 0.59 and armor on top of that Get a flamer and 2 LMG Have AT grenades so I suspect they will be a problem also. Jump back to quoted post29 Nov 2020, 15:26 PMgeneral_gawain Still don't like your suggestion of Anvil Engineers. That way you have IS clones (LMG+Enfields) with additional engineer options. Wow, that is a lackluster. Why not making them a unique fighting unit? The problem with Vickers K is that it does not work well with smg so giving them enfields is actually a buff. In addition since the have superior repair speed they should designed to be used less aggressively, the upgrade is optional anyway. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] OST Feedback29 Nov 2020, 15:22 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Nov 2020, 15:18 PMT.R. Stormjäger Panther starts with better accuracy. While Jackson and SU85 get accuracy bonuses, Panther gets turret and vehicle rotation and armour, while OKW Panther also gets +30% acceleration/deceleration (su85 gets 20% and is a casemate), -25% scatter and +25% moving accuracy. Please refrain from criticizing others on stats when you didn't bother opening them to begin with. again factually wrong . Panther does not start with better accuracy, it has worse accuracy to begin with: Su-85 Accuracy near 0.055 Accuracy mid 0.045 Accuracy far 0.04 Panther Accuracy near 0.06 Accuracy mid 0.045 Accuracy far 0.035 Pls check your stat before posting and: "Please refrain from criticizing others on stats when you didn't bother opening them to begin with." In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] UKF Feedback29 Nov 2020, 15:17 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Nov 2020, 15:12 PMgeneral_gawain It was only one idea of many (-> demo charges / satchel charges...). Giving their timing it shouldn't be that scary. We are talking about late game with a lot of AI options and elite infantry on opposing side. Either way we will have that situation at Mobile Assault Regiment nonetheless as you already implied, I don't think it will be op. But we will see of course. The idea of repair bonus, an lmg and armor is combined is bad. My suggestions was: Hammer heavy get heavy gammon bomb and armor. Anvil Heavy engineer get repair boost and possibly vicker k/enflieds. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] OST Feedback29 Nov 2020, 15:11 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Nov 2020, 14:52 PMT.R. Stormjäger Not only that, the target size decrease buff should also be reverted for both Panzer IV variants. With the Panther accuracy buff it is time to even out the playing field so that the target size decrease wasn't just for 1 side only. You claim is factual wrong. Allied TDs are far more accurate the Panther to begin with and get 3x times the bonus Panther gets. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] SOV Feedback29 Nov 2020, 15:07 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Nov 2020, 14:37 PMluvnest Can we make PTRS better so they can actually be a threat to light vehicles? That would help T1 and make Soviet less dependable on AT guns like ZIS or M42s. PTRS vs light could be improved by reducing time before firing. If that is fixed they should their AI moved to an ability. For instance their accuracy could be lower and hit the dirt provide accuracy buffs to PTRS. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] UKF Feedback29 Nov 2020, 15:04 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Nov 2020, 14:43 PMgeneral_gawain ... Heavy Sappers: All in for the idea of removing Vickers at heavy sappers upgrade. Just make the upgrade cheaper and give them the ability to build demo charges (like commandos) or throw satchel charges (AI/AT?). Would give more game options and fit the idea of heavy engineers. Maybe add a flamer upgrade, so you can use them on building heavy maps in late game as a heavy fortification assault unit (do they still have the armor upgrade?). The idea of heavy supper with flamer scary since the units has great target size and armor and the only thing keeping them back so far is the speed penalty. Actually the upgrade should be mutually exclusive with the doctrinal flamers In: COH2 Balance