Profile of Vipper

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: [Winter Balance Update] UKF Feedback3 Dec 2020, 07:22 AM Jump back to quoted post3 Dec 2020, 01:23 AMgeneral_gawain Sure? Can you look this up again? At the stats I look it has 160 frontal armor which is the same as the penetration of Shrek at long range... and Speed is even better than target size, because it means you desn't get hit at all when retreating/kiting (not even speaking about smoke cover of Panzertactican). Typo error you correct armor is 160 but with buff to speed the small target size and high DPS I do no think that shcrek is a serous threat. Jump back to quoted post3 Dec 2020, 01:23 AMgeneral_gawain Never used it in the last year. What happens? The ability is being "buffed" in preview, currently it live it work only in sectors that UKF player has captured. In the preview it work for all front-line sectors. The unit get smaller target size and after a few second separate planes arrive and attack every single enemy target in those sectors. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The Excessive Amount Of Micro Required For Brummbar3 Dec 2020, 07:10 AM Jump back to quoted post3 Dec 2020, 00:55 AMelchino7 You can't predict how much deviation the Stuka rocket has in order to BARELY miss the target for it to be hit only by AOE. Stuka has 0 scatter. Jump back to quoted post3 Dec 2020, 00:55 AMelchino7 No matter how you want to justify it, a change in speed velocity is a buff. A buff which makes hitting both with auto attacks or attack ground easier. Most people don't like it cause been able to predict or make use of hold fire rewards the skill of the player involved. I am not sure why there is such a fuss about weather increasing the speed of brumbar projectile is a buff or consistency change. It does have to be one or the other it can be both. Consistency changes can even be nerf. To me it is indifferent how some one call it. What I have said and will say it again. Is that I do no think that Brumbar need a buff to its performance but I would like to see used as other units and not to have to be so micro intensive. Jump back to quoted post3 Dec 2020, 00:55 AMelchino7 ... I think more people (USF players) would be happier if the 105mm Sherman was made equally strong and micro demanding as the Brummbear. ... Great, lets do then, lets reduce the velocity of the 105 sherma's projectile to that of Brumbar, at least unit behavior would be consistent. Jump back to quoted post3 Dec 2020, 00:55 AMelchino7 ... I think you need to learn that some people might not like your ideas and be in a disagreement instead of shielding behind the ground of it been "new player friendly" or "consistency"... I am more than aware the people might disagree with my point of view and I respect their opinion, that is why my post have "in my opinion" in them. I think this a lesson another specific should learn user and not me. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] UKF Feedback3 Dec 2020, 00:31 AM Jump back to quoted post3 Dec 2020, 00:11 AMgeneral_gawain Some remarks: Thanks for taking the time of reading and responding to my post. QF 17pd I am not sure the suggestions was clear to you. The idea is that the two version of the weapon similar to mortar one is cheaper but has limited range but can be upgraded to its current power. This not nerf but easier access to a version of the unit with lower power level. FF The suggestion is not nerf the unit either. Most unit use mid range as half their max range. I suspect that at an earlier stage FF had a superior range and now it is left with mid range of 45 which is superior even to Elef/JT/ISU. This more of "bug" that needs to be fixed. The accuracy change to penetration is also buff vs super heavies tanks. Centaur Centaur has 160/80 armor and 18 target size while ostwind has 110/55 armor and 22 target... Churchill Churchill has absolutely no problem killing a PzIV even the PzIV is parked in rear. M3 The commander is far from dead, try hold the line in 4vs4 and see what happens. Heavy sapper The durability of heavy sapper once vetted is superior to most elite infatry with a combination of target size 0.59 and 1.25 armor they have effective of around 170 HP for a total 850 EHP and 3 LMG having and a reinforcement cost reduction. Even if they do not beat the enemy infatry they win the attrition fight. I am pretty sure vet 3 heavy sapper with 3 lmg will beat vet 3 IS with 2 bren. The heavy sapper are simply badly designed and need redesign. Feel free to make you own suggestion. (correct the centaur armor value thank to general_gawain for the correction) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Hold the ground2 Dec 2020, 21:43 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Dec 2020, 21:32 PMAerohank It might now almost be as broken OP as close the pocket. but alla easier to pull of. In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: Hold the ground2 Dec 2020, 20:36 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Dec 2020, 19:55 PMelchino7 It's simple. Balance concerns goes to the UKF discussion thread. Announcing that there is a bug with the build goes towards the patch bug discussion. If people want to discuss how to proc the bug, this thread should work. If someone has a long post discussing a full rework of the ability they might as well make a new thread. As i said before, the opening post just described the ability and asked people to test it. A simple post in the other thread would had been enough. I am pretty sure that the ability need a new design . In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] SOV Feedback2 Dec 2020, 19:32 PM Imo m3 could lose the fuel and the ability for passenger to shoot. Allowing passenger to shoot could be an upgrade for 15-30 mu. The change would make the unit cheaper while also delaying shock value. M3 and similar unit could also have pop reduced with vet level so they are less of pop drain in late game.(copied from another thread) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: When are Panzerfusiliers getting nerfed?2 Dec 2020, 19:18 PM Imo m3 could lose the fuel and the ability for passenger to shoot. Allowing passenger to shoot could be an upgrade for 15-30 mu. The change would make the unit cheaper while also delaying shock value. M3 and similar unit could also have pop reduced with vet level so they are less of pop drain in late game. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Hold the ground2 Dec 2020, 19:16 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Dec 2020, 19:03 PMelchino7 Avoid creating new threads unless it's to discuss something outside of the scope of the new patch. Specially if the opening post is just "guys pls test this". This is in order to avoid everyone making a new thread for each topic of the patch. This thread will stay as it devolved into bug solving and moved towards the corresponding section. The ability is broken in large mods and should be look at. The reason I did not provide feeback myself was so other can test it with an open mind. Although this change is under fixing bugs in patch-notes it a huge buff to the ability so from balance point of view I am not even sure which thread is suitable to debate this. In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: When are Panzerfusiliers getting nerfed?2 Dec 2020, 18:02 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Dec 2020, 17:37 PMblvckdream Why would nerfing the M3 against small arms fire be a good idea? I am confused. Think it sis more about lowering the armor and making damage less RNG and less about the overal resistance. M3 has superior armor compared to vehicles of its class. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Hold the ground2 Dec 2020, 17:24 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Dec 2020, 17:14 PMJibberJabberJobber Does someone have an idea how this bug occurs / can be reproduced? And yes, the icon is tied to the effect itself, so it means squads have a permanent -20% RA buff. It did not happen to me when I used in the game. Maybe it happens when combined with suppression? I might try to test if I find someone to help me and have the time. In: Lobby