Profile of Vipper

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: Luftwaffe supply doctrine and OKW5 Dec 2015, 15:00 PM Lets check this scenario: From a team one is spending all his manpower for airdrops, one is spending all his manpower in teching and the team although playing roughly with 1 player less still manages to control half the map. In this case the opponents team will not lose to the KT but to better opponents... Other points: having a King tiger does not mean the game is won, it can be countered by cheaper TDs with longer range, is limited to 1 and it rather slow... In large game cashes return more resources than fuel drop in just few minutes... In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Luftwaffe supply doctrine and OKW5 Dec 2015, 10:12 AM So out of 4 player 1 is losing all manpower in airdrop a second lose all manpower in teching and they still control at least half the map. The enemy does not lose to KT they lose to better players. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Switch Schrecks with Panzerbusche on Volks. Thoughts?4 Dec 2015, 13:53 PM Instead of panzerbusche (that seams out of place) volks could get Panzerfaust (or even a previous version of the panzeshreck...) upgrade that would work differently. Instead of an MU ability is would be an upgrade that would allow V.Gs to fire a PFasut every 10-15 sec. either automatic vs vehicle or as an ability, stat could be around 45 range, 120 penetration, 80 damage no engine damage. Ober should in this case be built from HQ unlocked after second truck and cost less. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Tactical Support Company Commander26 Nov 2015, 16:44 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Nov 2015, 15:59 PMbroodwarjc LMG suppression on infantry was more of a problem than the M5's suppression will be. Suppression from hardy, numerous, early CP (LMG unlocked at 3CP) source was the problem, not a much more expensive, less durable(for a vehicle), much later suppression source. ... You don't have to post your game credentials if you don't want too, but expect your threads to dissolve into "No game id, no idea what he is talking about". Well the removal of defensive stance suppression was correct. If in your opinion USF M5 or the strafe run will not cause problems I guess will just have to wait and see. Imo the credentials approach you describe is flawed, I have given my prediction and I have backed it up with arguments, I have also replied to most counter arguments that made little sense...Any one with some knowledge of the game can judge if my argument are valid or not, so my credentials are unnecessary. I find the fact that more people are interested in my playcard than my argument a bit disturbing... I better to value my opinion by its validity than from my reputation. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Tactical Support Company Commander26 Nov 2015, 15:57 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Nov 2015, 15:40 PMDonnieChan just post it, or nobody will take you serious I don't really care if they take me seriously because this is not personnal, I only care that they take my opinion seriously. My opinion has the same value regardless of my ladder. People who have to look at ladder to judge the validity of an opinion should not (probably) be taken seriously... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Tactical Support Company Commander26 Nov 2015, 11:52 AM Jump back to quoted post26 Nov 2015, 11:35 AMFiresparks it's basically infantry company with a calliope instead of priest. It will be decent but I doubt overpowered. unless the calliope rockets are nuked tipped or something like that. And what where the most recent nerfs in infantry company? the removal of suppression. What does this commander brings apart from rockets? Doctrinal suppression... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Tactical Support Company Commander26 Nov 2015, 11:44 AM Jump back to quoted post26 Nov 2015, 11:40 AMpugzii playercard plz Does that mean that if my ladder lvl is higher than yours you will accept everything I say as correct? (I had this conversation before so check previous posts pls) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Tactical Support Company Commander26 Nov 2015, 11:42 AM Jump back to quoted post26 Nov 2015, 11:31 AMKatitof Wehr can LMG blob with mobile reinforcement since alpha. Why would it be an issue with USF now again? If you cant find the answer to that (why some thing that work in faction A creates problems in faction B) it seems you have no understanding of faction design and I can't help you. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Tactical Support Company Commander26 Nov 2015, 11:37 AM Jump back to quoted post26 Nov 2015, 10:29 AMbraciszek ... "Technically" in terms of balance, yes. It would be a design problem (and in your post clarify the commander as a design problem)... ... But in this situation, its not as drastic as that - its taxed by having a high CP count for light armor and costing more in MP for a vehicle crew as well, isnt that a form of compensation? In fact, people will complain about CP and the extra cost. USF does this with M15 AA halftrack as well, having a mobile suppression platform behind riflemen. Cant really complain about a reinforcing normal Halftrack following infantry as thats counterable and already present. ... Predicting design flaws without seeing all the variables present (all builds, vs all factions) IS assumption. .... I dont feel like arguing based on one simple stream of someone trying their best to use abilities/units from the commander more than the stock arsenal. If you read my post you will see that he first sentence you qouted reads that "The issue is more design" Actually the USF M5 is the best Half truck ability because it comes without an infantry unit so it actually more affordable, it also comes at the same CP as the Soviet M5... Compared to AA M15 it has not to tech cost and cost less fuel, is by far more mobile and one has the option instead of Quad to use it as reinforcement and transport that units can fire from (UP to 4 LMG or bazookas. I have actually seen the design parameters...Promotes blobs counters enemy blobs... All prediction are assumptions... If you don't feel like arguing then do not.... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Tactical Support Company Commander26 Nov 2015, 09:46 AM Jump back to quoted post26 Nov 2015, 09:23 AMSwift Without your playercard we don't know if this is an L2P issue with your prediction or whether you have the necessary perceived skill to judge it properly. Sounds harsh but we get a lot very low ranked players calling "This is going to be OP/UP" early with little justification for their suggestion. In other words you want to predecide the value of my opinion based on players card. The same way the the theories of patent office clerk where not taken seriously because of his job. (and no I don't claim any resemblance I am simply pointing out the error in your approach). As I said better focus on my opinion and not my credential...My knowledge and understanding of the game, my ability in the game and my ladder position are 3 completely separated issues that only sometimes are connected. In: COH2 Balance