Profile of Grumpy

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1960

General Information


Thread: The dark truth about 4v4. 7 Dec 2018, 15:33 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Dec 2018, 10:37 AMHarry It has been 4 years since I started to play this game. And every time they just patch so a little in terms of balancing the 4v4 game mode. 4v4 need some love. Are they going to make the 4v4 balance or not? I am really sick of the 25-min marker. Sorry, but don't really agree. The balance in 4v4 doesn't seem that bad, with late game maybe a tiny bit tilted to Axis but not so bad that I would complain. The biggest difference is that late-game Allies seem to need a little better coordination, which isn't a problem when playing with friends and using Vent or Discord but is a problem when playing with randoms. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: IS2- Is it worth buying?3 Dec 2018, 23:34 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Dec 2018, 22:03 PMMittens A good thank that needs a health buff. no b/c it gets outclassed by JT,ELE, and mass amounts of panthers that it cant counter. Exactly - it makes the unit and commander too situational. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: IS2- Is it worth buying?3 Dec 2018, 19:03 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Dec 2018, 07:23 AMNaOCl Same thread as KT, to see if the problem lies with all Heavy Tanks in COH2 being underwhelming. (Execpt Pershing) Anyone here use Pershings in a 4v4? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why is OKW arty officer even a thing?1 Dec 2018, 18:16 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Nov 2018, 07:56 AMAarotron Yeah it could use some rework. I mean i like my double sturmpios with 10% accuracy boost and mark target on infantry but its so awkward to use. Particuraly when that random mortar wipes officer and nearby units are on their way back to the base. This happens way too often to make the unit useful. I try it occasionally and always regret buying it, particularly because the retreat seems to be tied to just one model and not the whole squad. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why is usf at gun so bad?28 Nov 2018, 16:14 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Nov 2018, 04:47 AMJae For Jett All AT guns can hit the ground. It's collisions with other objects (which is relatively uncommon) that can still happen. Wasn't this eliminated for the raketen in one of the previous patches? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why is usf at gun so bad?28 Nov 2018, 16:13 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Nov 2018, 02:50 AMzerocoh you really don't need LT, you can hold out until shermans or just get BARs and focus down squads, pack howie will pay itself very fast, stuart is also okay if the opponent is spread out. AAHT will die pretty easy to good raketen players not worth the 60 fuel IMO, not to mention the thing is awful at killing making your opponent float tons of manpower. ATG is not late, they are cheap and captain can speed it up. Also, if you are fighting brumms with ATGs you are doing it wrong. After the "Buff Ostwind" thread I tried the AAHT again, just to see if it was as good as people were claiming. Your comments were exactly my experience, other than to say that it doesn't take a "good" raketen player to kill it, just someone who can cloak and move into about 40 range before firing the first shot (unless that is what you mean by a "good" raketen player). The last time I tried one, I lost it to Ullumulu. +1 on all your other comments. If I think I'm going to be facing a Brum, I try to get a Jackson as soon as possible because anything else bleeds manpower. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why is usf at gun so bad?27 Nov 2018, 19:08 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Nov 2018, 18:26 PMddd why It's okay with vet. The problem is keeping the vet as it is wiped easily. As someone else pointed out, it's good for P4's and below. The other problem that it has is that it is a munitions hog if you want to use it well, and USF always seems low on munitions. The actual one in WWII was disliked by US troops. For some reason, instead of just copying the 6 pounder, the US changed the design and ended up with something that had much lower penetration and other design flaws. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF Tech Changes Mod Changelog27 Nov 2018, 16:37 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Nov 2018, 21:39 PMblvckdream Changes look very good to me. Not sure why people complain. These changes don´t really go into the "make every faction the same" direction. They just make USF a better faction by making basic units easier to field. (MG and AT-gun) ....because some people don't want USF any more competitive than it is right now. I don't think there are a lot negative comments about the changes by people who show their playercard and play USF. The tech changes will help a lot more in 1's and 2's than 3's and 4's. It still seems like USF needs non-doctrinal access to either an Easy 8 or Pershing. In: Lobby
Thread: How does penetration work25 Nov 2018, 05:44 AM Jump back to quoted post24 Nov 2018, 20:31 PMelchino7 https://coh2db.com/stats/ Thanks! In: Lobby
Thread: How does penetration work24 Nov 2018, 14:45 PM Jump back to quoted post24 Nov 2018, 08:29 AMVipper First of all congratulation for first checking stats before posting, but unfortunately that data is out date us pointed out by ShadowLinkX37. Cruzz has file you can download that has many stats: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B7gwy65JLbSRMEJ3M2ZPandMMW8/view?usp=sharing You can also find online I think but I don't have a link right now. hope that this was helpful. Thanks for the link to Cruzz's file. I eventually found the increase in SU-85 penetration in the patch notes but it's tedious searching for everything that way. In: Lobby