Profile of Rocket

Avatar Area

Offline United States
Posts: 733

General Information
Email: wbafnyrf0(uof)tznvy.pbz
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/jonathan.sales.79
Twitter: @JonSales5
Steam: 76561197972942793
Birthday: 1987-01-23
Residence:

United States
Nationality:

United States
Timezone: America/Indiana/Indianapolis
Game Name: Rocket

Show Latest Posts


Thread: OKW is completely out of control10 Dec 2015, 00:47 AM There needs to be a hotfix like now. Pretty much unplayable. HOW DID THIS GET BY THE BETA TESTING???? Either relic does not listen so there is no point of even having a beta test and participating or it was tested by 90% axis fanboys. If only alex was still around to bask in the glory and to tell us how the charts are fudged and not only that, but opkw is underpreforming. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: A move > ambushed Goliath10 Dec 2015, 00:34 AM Jump back to quoted post9 Dec 2015, 23:33 PMPorygon Thank you Major, it is so disparate but great to know out of four page finally got someone sense making to verify what I claimed. Of course I know how to use the Goliath under this "setting", you must utilize the true sight mechanism or wait at retreat path and Alluluchewbaca the retreating blob. What we did back in COH1 does not work anymore. It is ridiculous though, the demo must require a sweeper to spot, but an A-moving squad / blob can AUTOMATICALLY spot the cloaked Goliath and finish it before the Goliath retreat or reaching the squad, is strictly stupid. The cloaking mechanism of Goliath should encourage the Axis player setting up a trap and decimate the bad blobbing player, but it ends up punishing the Axis player wasting 100 muni by doing the correct and intended way. They need to remove or greatly reduce the distance of an infantry squad spotting the CLOAKED Goliath, and make sweepers detecting it. lmao "it punishes the axis player". If you put it behind a building like I said above what is going to stop you from wiping my squad? I will have a split second to react and the blast radius is huge so still not going to matter. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: A move > ambushed Goliath10 Dec 2015, 00:32 AM It is broken as shit if you are in ANY map with buildings especially city type maps all you have to do is hide it behind a building then boom dead squad. There is 0 way to know that it is there, unless you can see the future you will not retreat in time before you get wiped. Who cares if it cost 100 munitions when it can easily wipe my rifle squad with two bars. Who won there? and it is fast enough to sometimes cut off retreating infantry. Lets be realistic other than early game you cant fight axis infantry with just one squad your going to move to use mulitple units and often times close together because of like I mentioned narrow streets things like that. It has 0 counter other than driving and clear open territory, but even on those maps there is always a few buildings to hide it behind where it becomes unavoidable unlike demo charges In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF and UKF bases2 Dec 2015, 22:06 PM If there going to fix anything fix it so the weapon racks are always closest to the front of the battlefield thats annoying to have to run to the back of your base more so for USF base. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Should OKW shrek be moved to another teir/unit?1 Dec 2015, 18:23 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Dec 2015, 18:11 PMG4bb4_G4nd4lf Since Sturms are the only unit, apart from volks, that have voice lines for shrecks I support the idea of giving shrecks to Sturms (120 for 2 shrecks). Alternatively, shrecks could stay on Volks as a snare. >90 ammo to unlock the ability to fire shrecks >same cooldown/range as PzFausts >same pen/damage as normal shrecks No more A-moving Volks blobs rekking tanks +1 but if you give okw a snare then I think you have to give the brits one too. This would make vehicle play more annoying for both sides. If they moved shrek to strums and volks couldn't A-move tank wreck, it would make vehicle play more fun for both sides. Then give volks maybe an AI upgrade. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Should OKW shrek be moved to another teir/unit?1 Dec 2015, 18:02 PM Agreed volks should not have them think moving them to strums would be best, with incendiary nades volks have too much utility still having shreks. If they simply made them similar to zooks I think that would maybe help too where they would not pen as much and do as much dmg. I don't know about this patch in general I don't mind them buffing volks I guess but the whole design of them having the reduced income equaled them having very effective units and a non-doct heavy and vet 5 and also that it would be somewhat of a big loss to them if you wiped a squad took out a panther, jp4, or KT. Now I feel like they will simply just be able to replace it when before taking one of those out might of meant GG for them. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: British mortar1 Dec 2015, 17:53 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Dec 2015, 17:45 PMKatitof Thats actually not entierly true, because of RET rifle nades when they're inside. Ahh true, although sometimes if it is a building or something tall the nades tend to like get stuck or some shit and do not go through the shot blocker. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: British mortar1 Dec 2015, 17:42 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Nov 2015, 12:18 PMBulgakov I am not bitching. Do you see anger and aggression in everyone's words because you are full of anger and aggression yourself? I proposed a change, the vast majority disagreed with me and suggested constructive ways to deal with this unit. I'm reconsidering my opinion. But you can't be constructive, you only want arguments and flaming. You can't post without adding an insult. I will never understand how the mods leave you here annoying their members. To answer your points: Shreks cannot rip it apart if it is braced. Shreks have to get to it to rip it apart, it can be a long way away and protected by MG / enemy army. Ost MG bunker cannot brace Ost MG bunker is not useful behind shot blockers Ost MG bunker is not long range and can easily be avoided I don't know why your comparing Ost bunkers to Brit emplacements. 1 is MG based more like USF emplacement. The other is a mortar. They serve two different things for two different factions which both are designed around. USF emplacement cannot brace USF emplacement is not useful behind shot blockers USF emplacement is not long range and can easily be avoided see how i did that USF emplacement can be destroyed by 1 incediary nade, there fore OST bunkers should be destroyed by 1 molotov In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW Vet 5 justified (December Update)?1 Dec 2015, 17:05 PM With full income and still having vet 5 they will completely dominate late game. It will be impossible to out cap them because there infantry at vet 5 can already just stand on cap and ignore pretty much any other allied infantry or vehicles. Now on top of that they will have plenty more resources to spam vehicles and off maps. I think for full income vet 5 will need nerfed. Maybe there trucks too since there nerfing all off maps as well. I see the problem with them being linked to teching but after all there has to be some compensation for buffing volks and restoring full income. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW Vet 5 justified (December Update)?1 Dec 2015, 16:59 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Dec 2015, 16:37 PMUlaire Minya That's an invalid comparison considering the StuG can deal with infantry. JP4 can be defeated by a couple zooks. Phase tech is stupid and broken. Assuming it gets fixed one day, JP4 will be completely useless. LOL. If you let you jp4 get defeated by a couple of zooks then you must be terrible at this. Or you drove it into enemy lines with 0 inf or any support. In: COH2 Balance