Profile of Esxile

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1

General Information
Steam: 76561197961387624


Thread: M4 Sherman needs cost decrease 24 Aug 2021, 09:31 AM Jump back to quoted post24 Aug 2021, 08:50 AMVipper If in your opinion PzIV is thread to Jackson you are simply doing something wrong when playing the game. What an argument, you convinced me. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: M4 Sherman needs cost decrease 24 Aug 2021, 07:31 AM Jump back to quoted post23 Aug 2021, 21:17 PMShadowLinkX37 Use the AP then. Sherman AP shell has better AoE profile than the cromwell. You don't understand, Sherman HE shell is a poor's man shield. I personally don't think it is that better than the P4, in some specific circumstances probably but anytime a P4 is nearby and you don't have an Atgun close-by then the P4 is better because even if it deals a little less AI damage its a threat to anything with the same type of shell and superior survivability. So at the end, every time the P4 is fielded the P4 is better. Look at the top players, what do they spam every time they play Ostheer once they reach T3, the P4 and then call-in a Tiger. What are they doing when they play USF, 2xSherman76 with maybe 1 M4A3 and then Jackson. Statistically, on paper, the sherman is great vs infantry but its an overkill to mask the reality that the tank deal poorly in any other aspect of the game and at the stage it hit the field what you need is something consistent on which you can pivot your infantry, not an overkill AI tank that translate terribly into the late game because of its inexistant survivability vs late game units unlike the P4 that will continue to pose a threat to the Jackson, Firefly or Su-85. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: M4 Sherman needs cost decrease 23 Aug 2021, 20:58 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Aug 2021, 20:05 PMShadowLinkX37 Sherman is fine. 110F for best HE shells of any medium, MG upgrade, best moving accuracy modifier, versatile smoke dispenser and gets decrew. Go urban assault and buy dozer upgrade and you get 215 armor and 720 HP. Can trade handily with OKW p4s with that upgrade for cheaper fuel price. Something that needs to be repeated continuously is that medium tanks are largely rng fiestas. Sometimes p4s dump on opposing squads, sometimes they miss continuously. Same goes for the sherman, the t34, and the cromwell. Play safe with them and you can save your units from bad engagements. Don't like HE sherman? Try one of the multiple other sherman variants who are all great in their own right. The best HE shell is the shell that also do AT damage. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pfuss vs AssEngi22 Aug 2021, 15:36 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Aug 2021, 15:33 PMthedarkarmadillo Better at what? Repairs? Laying mines? Handling garrisons? Rifles and cav rifles are combat units. It shouldn't blow your mind that thay are better at combat than an engineer squad..... I think he means more valuable even if different. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pfuss vs AssEngi22 Aug 2021, 14:30 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Aug 2021, 14:10 PMVipper I am perfectly calm. You have yet to explain why you choose to compare PF vs Ass Eng so pls do not use "again" as if you had give any reasons. As I said if you do not want to respond to a simply question that other have also asked, simply say no comment but pls lose with this attitude. And Allow me to close with a word of advice, if you want me to post less in this thread then I suggest you stop quoting me and forcing me to respond to you... Where did I ask for a comparison between Pfuss and Assgen? Did I say they have the same role and purpose? We all know this is not the first time you're hijacking a topic with your personal logic, didn't you see that people where giving their impression and several also tested it to reach a similar conclusion that pfuss ripe appart Assgen on close combat. What's your purpose here if you don't read the answer already given and harassing me to repeat again the same thing? Now for the conclusion, is it normal and balance? I don't think so, but other have a different opinion and I'm not trying to impose in any sort my opinion over their like you try to do with your repetitive questioning. @moderation, can we clean up this mess with this poster? Their no value in those ultimate answers. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pfuss vs AssEngi22 Aug 2021, 13:45 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Aug 2021, 12:46 PMVipper Not by you who started this rant, sorry thread. More importantly this would be a much better thread if that info was actually in OP. Any reasoning why you choose to compare these particular infatry, that have different roles, in combat? If you do not want to respond to these questions its fine by me. As I say calm down. I'm not required to answer again the same questions because you don't agree with what's been said. If you persist on it I'll start questioning your purpose on this topic. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pfuss vs AssEngi22 Aug 2021, 12:31 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Aug 2021, 10:57 AMVipper This is your OP at first glance it look more like a you lost a fight using AssEn vs PF and you decided to let some steam of by posting in the forum but lets give you the benefit of the doubt. A) How many times have you tested AssEng vs PF before deciding they lose badly? What parameters did you use (weapons, distances, vet)? (or did this happen to you in one game and you decided to start this thread) B) In your opinion is it that PF are too good at close range or that AssEng that are bad at close range? C)Do you really think that the AssEng are the reason Armor company is the least picked commander? What mod are talking about? D) Do you actually have any suggestion? D)Most importantly why did you choose to compare two units with different roles? Why in your opinion the combat performance of these can be used to draw conclusions? Those points have already been answered. Read the topic. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF players ragequiting in team games21 Aug 2021, 10:16 AM Balance team have methodically nerf everything that could give a crush in the USF roaster. And everything else has been made to be completely RNG dependent. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Pfuss vs AssEngi21 Aug 2021, 09:19 AM Jump back to quoted post21 Aug 2021, 08:31 AMVipper This thread should be closed because it is flawed. If one thinks that PF are OP one should start a thread about that. If one thinks that Ass. Eng. are UP one should start a thread about that. This thread is quite pointless and although "supposedly" is about a specific match up, it does not even provides tests or videos of this match up. Calm down Nobody, if you don't like it then pass on, we're not in your personal backyard here. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pfuss vs AssEngi20 Aug 2021, 13:26 PM Jump back to quoted post20 Aug 2021, 13:04 PMKoRneY Sturm pios can't build any of that shit either and they cost even more. They're literally translated to assault engineers. They're not mainlines either. Yet they fight better mainline infantry when you manage to put then on their best position. They've been buffed during several patches to have them being able to do so. In: COH2 Balance