Profile of nee

Lesson here is don't piss off your teammates, when they are already pissed.
Are you really surprised that kicking an irritated dog results in it biting you?

Coulda sworn I saw it listed Stackability in Raw Modifiers as False ;/

I think if the Ram ability had its target vehicle requirement removed the tank would be like 50 times more survivable and thus more useful. You'd still get the engine overheat and can only sprint forward, but at least your options expand to stand and fight or run away, rather than stand and fight or run into the enemy.

That or make it doctrinal 2x call in as a cheaper but weaker alternative to non-doc '85.

2. it works because i have done it. ive seen replays that had people in them doing it. use your mouse and troll through the net yourself.

I'll take that as "no I won't prove it go prove it yourself"

3. i dont know how to reply to it because the logic is not compatible with mine.

You should focus on thinking over replies rather than trying to find a rebuttal.

Another thing to consider:

Without choosing doctrines, OKW, USF and UKF do not have halftracks. FRPs are a form of immobile sources of reinforcement. Are we to suggest that OKW also get 251 halftracks, and USF/ UKF swap their doctrinal halftracks with another core unit? All to make the game much more symmetrical?

There is also the tactical disadvantages to having FRPs in the first place. If you set up an FRP in the middle of, say, Red Ball Express, you need to send men in all directions from the FRP source if the enemy took over sectors near your base. OKW can branch out from their FRP source yes, that's kind of the point, but lack of emplacements outside of doctrinal choices means they need to move units around to take back points, or send men to reinforce a position.

End of the day, there are plenty of disadvantages to utilizing forward retreat points. Arguing entirely on the side of time needed for running from base vs FRP, and trying to advocate FRP's removel from only that perspective is, to say the least, idiotic.

No dude, it's not the map. It's FRP. Without FRP times are similar.
I just showed times between retreat and getting back to the same point for both side but when one side has FRP.

The factions that have no FRP- Ostheer and Soviets- have something called Halfracks. Not only are they mobile sources of reinforcement, and also means to transport troops, but can reasonably hold their own and support nearby squads.

So really, time it takes to walk back and forth from base versus a faction that has FRP is unfair, as non-FRP factions has methods to move faster, and not just from base after a retreat, too.

i mean, if you want to deny yourself an extreme advantage..

It's an advantage only because certain other factions don't have FRP.

Which to me, might prove the better option.

Yes, actually it sort of will. Players will realize that they're losing map control by losing presence for 1+ minute of the map when they mass retreat.

People can continue to blob, sure. But players who take more strategic positions with mg placement or mines or using cover will be rewarded by gaining extra time to set up defenses or cap more territory.

Basically, it discourages blobbing because those players will lose and unless you want to lose, it would discourage blobs, promote strategy in a "strategy" game that requires different methods instead of a blob. Or, rage quit and move to a new game.

If people will blob they will continue to blob. As long as they aren't forced to mass retreat then they have no reason to resort to other strategies.
Right now, you either blob and win, blob and lose, or win/lose with anything else. Remove FRP and you will get...well blob to win/ lose or not to win/lose. In other words nothing else. But before you say "well what's the big deal then"? It's because FRP are features unique to three of five factions. I don't play Ostheer if I want to play as Germans with FRP, I play OKW.

1. one time cost or negligible 3 pop cap cost can not justify the amount of time it will save the user. the cost of FRP is not the same cost that goes for other investments.

300 manpower and the time and queue taken up for OKW headquarters/ UKF FA is pretty hefty, even when playing in larger custom maps with 3x resource rate. You either build stuff immediately to reap the benefit of Regimental HQ, or it does nothing as you save up for the FRP upgrade. Until then nothing happens.
You remove FRP and you might as well leave T2 truck in HQ sector. All OKW trucks have a tactical reason, and provides clear tactical benefits, when deployed in the field. Since you cannot retreat to T2, the only reasonable place to put it is next to your base truck because you not only have FRP but medics.

2. i speak mainly for 3v3+ and if you are letting scott barrage your base, either
a. you put it too forward or
b. you mass retreated as in EVERYTHING retreated which the blame falls on you
c. you are not spreading your unit around the base. lets take General Mud, the best and most competitive map, for example.

Sounds like it is balanced, then. if I use it right then it's great; if I use it wrong then I deserve to lose. So what's the problem?

You can safely put the base at max range from Katty assuming it is staying just behind enemy frontline and shave a minute off of every retreat. this is not risk v. reward. it is like giving one faction HMG, mortar and ATG and another none of them for the sake of "diversity". Yes, the stats are much less drastic in most other 3v3+ maps but the point still stands.

Just because someone manages to barrage your base doesn't mean you let them.
Mass retreating and getting them all blown up is a disadvantage to having using FRP, and discourages over-reliance on blobbing.
Front lines move up or back. An aggressive player will put down FRP very close to reap the rewards; if s/he can survive, then their side will win because retreat distance is much closer. Any smart opponent will get the gist and counterplay to remove this advantage.
Unless you chose Luftwaffe/ Fortifications, the OKW player on average is the player with no HMG, comparable mortar or ATG. Having FRP however serves to compensate.

I assume you are advocating for removing FRP; in that case, what better proof than to demonstrate by having yourselve livestream/ post replay of a match in General Mud as OKW/ UKF/ USF without ever utilizing FRP, and win?