Login

russian armor

Cromwell Centaur AA Tank little bit OP?

23 Jun 2016, 18:10 PM
#1
avatar of Spielführer

Posts: 314

Hi folks,

what is your opinion about the Centaur? I personally find it OP. It shreds infantry so fast, while the Ostwind or FlaK Halftrack only cries in a corner.
23 Jun 2016, 18:12 PM
#2
avatar of Mittens
Donator 11

Posts: 1276

23 Jun 2016, 18:14 PM
#3
avatar of Crystal

Posts: 97

Nah he's good. It was very strong before when he had the Cromwell's mobility but it's gone.
23 Jun 2016, 18:15 PM
#4
avatar of Vuther
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1

Would consider the Ostwind the bigger balance problem (Gieb buffs) by comparison
23 Jun 2016, 18:16 PM
#5
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17583 | Subs: 8

It was fine for the past 6 months, its still fine now.
23 Jun 2016, 20:02 PM
#6
avatar of Waegukin

Posts: 609

Its fine, Flak halftrack and Ostwind are the problems.
24 Jun 2016, 00:28 AM
#7
avatar of Stug life

Posts: 4474

It's doing is job unlike ostwind that like to shower in hot water inf
24 Jun 2016, 00:32 AM
#8
avatar of Zyswen

Posts: 149 | Subs: 1

centaur gun need be op because of the slow mobility.
24 Jun 2016, 00:33 AM
#9
avatar of Intelligence209

Posts: 1124

24 Jun 2016, 01:05 AM
#10
avatar of Dangerous-Cloth

Posts: 2066

Ostwind is good too. Just go double pak 40 into triple Ostwind :bananadance:
24 Jun 2016, 02:58 AM
#11
24 Jun 2016, 03:46 AM
#12
avatar of TheGentlemenTroll

Posts: 1044 | Subs: 1

Working as intended.


How else you gonna make people buy a faction
24 Jun 2016, 05:50 AM
#13
avatar of wake6830

Posts: 17

Working as intended.


Well, I guess it's realistic, unlike most of the inf/armor interactions in this game. Not at all consistent with (or even close to) what should be comparable units in-game, however.
24 Jun 2016, 06:11 AM
#14
avatar of ImSkemo

Posts: 444

its slow as fuck if you dont use it cleverly you will loose it faster than any other tank in the game.. Its OK deal with it AT gun instead of charging your blobs headon
24 Jun 2016, 07:46 AM
#15
avatar of geist

Posts: 79

I will never understand why Allies need strong anti infantry tank, while their blobs are only punishable by Stuka.

Ostwind should be like this.
24 Jun 2016, 08:03 AM
#16
avatar of Kamzil118

Posts: 455

jump backJump back to quoted post24 Jun 2016, 07:46 AMgeist
I will never understand why Allies need strong anti infantry tank, while their blobs are only punishable by Stuka.

Ostwind should be like this.

Or the OKW could get the Whirbilwind.
24 Jun 2016, 08:05 AM
#17
avatar of CptEend
Patrion 14

Posts: 369

Working as intended.


Because we all know RNG is not a factor in this game so one sample is enough proof of the Centaur being OP.
24 Jun 2016, 08:24 AM
#18
avatar of austerlitz

Posts: 1705

Unit is fine,seems OP because ostwind is weak.
24 Jun 2016, 08:32 AM
#19
avatar of RealName

Posts: 276

Centaur is fine, if not a bit redundant on a faction that already has terminator infantry and racecar crush-all tanks.

In fact, I find it pretty useless seing as how Cromwell is 10x better than it, because it's cheaper, has anti tank, AND can do as good (if not better) anti infantry if coupled with some crush micro.
24 Jun 2016, 14:02 PM
#20
avatar of NEVEC

Posts: 708 | Subs: 1

3 speed means it's one of the slowest tanks in this game, you should use it carefull if you don't want to be rekt by axis tank.
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest
Diversity Cup Isi vs. Inca

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag shadics ARG.
  • U.S. Forces flag TüMe
  • Ostheer flag The101stAirBorne
  • Ostheer flag Clororaa
uploaded by TüMe

Board Info

270 users are online: 270 guests
18 posts in the last 24h
128 posts in the last week
588 posts in the last month
Registered members: 36288
Welcome our newest member, Mcdanoldrti
Most online: 1221 users on 25 Feb 2020, 12:03 PM