Profile of Katitof

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/katitof


Thread: PG's bundle-grenade vs usf riflemen grenade28 Dec 2015, 09:52 AM Jump back to quoted post28 Dec 2015, 09:06 AMmycalliope should have same stats as commando light gammon bomb The very moment the only stat bonus PGs will have will be +25% accuracy vet and nothing else that would impact their stats, just like commandos. Deal? Different units, different stats. Bundle nade is pretty much the same as guard nade, stop whining. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Double M1919 Rifles28 Dec 2015, 09:50 AM Jump back to quoted post28 Dec 2015, 09:35 AMIntelligence209 Double 1919s are breaking the game... Must be why infantry doctrine was uncontested meta for months, while rifle doctrine was neglected. Oh wait... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Panzerfussiliers28 Dec 2015, 09:49 AM Jump back to quoted post28 Dec 2015, 09:10 AMmycalliope sturmpionners cost 9 popcap that also should be looked at it should be 6 or 7 Any reason why PG level infantry should have gren pop or less except "I'm rabid fanboy, heil victory!" one? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Heavy Tank Use28 Dec 2015, 08:23 AM Devs wanted to limit heavy tank use and promote light vehicle phase and that is exactly what happened. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: What is good map design and what are examples?27 Dec 2015, 17:27 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Dec 2015, 17:20 PMBeefSurge OKW is fine, they have crappy vehicles and no lategame infantry. I think you're playing some other OKW then the rest of the community. The OKW I play with have fuel free capping, durable vehicle, cost effective lights, mediums and stock heavy, together with doctrinal self spotting panther and unit eraser that relic for whatever reason thought was a good idea to increase its range while keeping its pinpoint accuracy, but somehow the same was bit no-no for allied counterpart and B4. OKW meds and heavies just got a cost increase without performance changes, because of how powerful they are and how early they arrive. So, where are these crappy vehicle you're playing with? I might try that custom mod to see your POV. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Comet armor too much?27 Dec 2015, 16:56 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Dec 2015, 00:10 AM__deleted__ Hey there! So here we have the mighty british medium tank, the Comet. Which in real life had 70-102 mm frontal armor (around 70 in the front of the chassis, and 102 on the front of the turret). On the other hand, we have the Jagdpanzer4, which in real life had the 75mm PaK42 cannon, and used the PzGr.39/42 (a armor-piercing capped ballistic capped shell [APCBC]) which was able to penetrate a 149mm thick steel at 1000m, and 168mm at 500m. However, in the game, the Jagdpanzer have a really hard time penetrating the frontal armor of the Comet, and doing damage. By hard time I mean 8 out of 10 shots will bounce. I'm not even mentioning that the Comet almost never bounces from the sloped (!!!) frontal armor of a Panther, but the Panther bounces pretty nicely from the 90° frontal armor of the Comet...physics at it's finest... In my opinion, a little bit of nerf would be handy, not too much, just make every second shot go through, and cause damage, from the Jgdpz4. Best regards. And any actual GAMEPLAY based reason why it should be changed? Because following your reasoning, we should buff T34/76 to P4 level without changing costs and giving churchills more armor then it had on release, because IRL it was thicker then tiger Is armor. No IRL based argument makes sense, because coh2 is not a simulator, but immerse arcade RTS. Comet have cost comparable to panther and should have comparable stats. What you suggest makes all the sense for a simulator and means less then zero for coh2. That is balance. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Please consider removing infantry crush27 Dec 2015, 15:01 PM Press T. Here, infantry crush hardcountered. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Penal Battalion a completely different approach27 Dec 2015, 11:27 AM Jump back to quoted post27 Dec 2015, 11:06 AMVipper And thus give Soviets access to a more resilient flamer riflemen with a tech cost... As well as stock infantry that actually doesn't need to fight with its rifles stock. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Penal Battalion a completely different approach27 Dec 2015, 10:56 AM Or-now sit tight: Instead of completely breaking a unit that works(cons), penals cost to 280-290, long dps increase by 100%. There, unit unique in soviet army, useful at all ranges, but shines at mid or short, what it lacks in utility, makes up for in SVT being useful at all ranges. You don't fix broken unit by breaking another one in the process. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: [Relic blog] Game Balance: The State of 1v1 for ESL27 Dec 2015, 09:06 AM Jump back to quoted post25 Dec 2015, 13:33 PM__deleted__ Don't let the charts fool you, top players know how to counter almost everything. If we take the player base outside of the 250 top range, things will go south very quickly. Whaaat? Good players know how to play and the game is balanced around them? HOW COME! No one gives a rats ass about balance in 4 digit brackets, because these people lack the basic skill in game and can't be considered as any valid source of data other then "total mp population". Games are not balanced around noobs, because noobs problems are in no way related to balance. In: COH2 Balance