Profile of Katitof

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/katitof


Thread: Greedy Relic..7 Mar 2016, 09:29 AM Jump back to quoted post7 Mar 2016, 09:09 AMSwift It's not Relic it's Sega and THQ you have to blame. The developer does not regulate the business model. ^This. In: Lobby
Thread: Greedy Relic..7 Mar 2016, 07:51 AM If balance of commanders is your concern instead of the actual abilities they provide, then you're up for a disappointments in the future as the balance changes with time and commanders aren't excluded from thee changes. In: Lobby
Thread: Why 2 germans?6 Mar 2016, 21:50 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Mar 2016, 21:45 PMThunderhun RUSE has Italy, Japan...with 44-45 design. Its not rocket science to add them to Coh 2... RUSE is a gimmick based game... MoW:AS2 also has them, but the stuff happening there is just hilarity incarnation. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Cancer Doctrine has no counter6 Mar 2016, 14:03 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Mar 2016, 13:53 PMBlackKorp It is cancer, seriously, listen to community I remember the community saying 320dmg, 50 range, 2500hp free tiger ace was a skill play that had a downskide to exploit I don't think community as a whole is the good thing to listen to. However, I know how to spot something that IS actually OP. Its simple. It becomes meta INSTANTLY, for everyone, until its nerfed. And I don't see all top players using this doc. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Infantry Sections, Cover Bonuses and Design6 Mar 2016, 11:41 AM Jump back to quoted post6 Mar 2016, 11:28 AMMr.Smith You are correct about the RE Vet1 bonus. You are incorrect, however, about the Tommy squad bonus (or did they ninja-change it last patch?). You can easily test it with PIATs in-cover and out-of-cover. You have the details in Cruzzies the more you know thread. However, I wouldn't be surprised if something more was reverted back together with vet recently. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Brit tier 2 idea6 Mar 2016, 11:06 AM Jump back to quoted post6 Mar 2016, 10:58 AMSpinflight "The Volksgrenadiers would probably have a massive advantage against everything but Tigers, King Tigers and possibly Churchills simply because of the PIAT's scatter values. If the target is moving, the Panzershreck will definitely win." I'm sure it will, but I'm interested in qualitative numbers. Even against a stationary target how much better is a shreck? Moving too against light or medium armour, just how big an advantage does a shreck give you in comparison. I've nicked Shrecks from axis players only to have them complain about them being OP. Shreck on long range will often hit. It also hits moving targets. PIATs tend to miss even stationary targts often unless you're aiming at KT or JT or Ele. PIATs are superior vs super heavy armor, but completely useless against everything else. Inb4 rampaging axis fanboys jump on me, screaming how OP piat is, yeah, this is why everyone goes for PIATs asap instead of ATG. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Infantry Sections, Cover Bonuses and Design6 Mar 2016, 10:57 AM Regarding british cover bonuses, they apply EXCLUSIVELY to lee enfields. Same with REs vet1 bonus, which applies exclusively to STENs. All other weapons are UNAFFECTED by cooldown and reload bonuses, so PIATs reload as fast on any other infantry. Plus, to call it cover bonus is just wrong, because tommies perform normally in cover and have debuff out of cover, that hardy can be called a bonus. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Brit tier 2 idea5 Mar 2016, 19:55 PM So you're basically forcing players to pay for an upgrade that doesn't perform up to the cost as it provides inferior option and think it will be used if players are forced for it? Basically a straight forward nerf which will unlock option that still no one will use, because its not worth it. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: had problems to kill emplacment and counter battery add it 5 Mar 2016, 19:52 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Mar 2016, 14:00 PMThamor Some maps so small, that leFH gets counterbarraged by click&forget ability that has 0 cost. Counter barrage should be timer ability, use ammunition and it's on for like 30-45s then have cooldown on it. Not free cost fire 24/7 every single indirect unit opponent tries to use... pls lelic, no other faction has even free artillery in their base buildings...good stuff. No other faction have arty in base then UKF... No other faction have super heavy tank as stock unit then OKW... No other faction have well balanced and wide unit selection to respond to basically anything then Ost... No other faction have 6 men on all infantry squads then Sov... No other faction can repair own vehicles with their own vehicle crews then USF... Not all factions are supposed to have everything. TBH as long as reckon+stuka combo exists in a single doctrine, I just can't sympathize with bitching axis players. Each faction has its strengths and weaknesses, apparently FINALLY indirect fire is going to be the strength of UKF as it was clearly meant by them having these fucking 25 pounders at the base NOT as a decoration anymore. And before screaming even more that something is free on allied side, let me remind you that both axis armies have NOT A SINGLE SIDE UPGRADE TO MANAGE THEIR ECONOMY AS EVERY SINGLE ALLIED ARMY. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Vet fix March 9th5 Mar 2016, 17:13 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Mar 2016, 17:07 PMEatMyFrag Pull your head out of YOUR rear for a second. I'm talking about the damn bugs they create by simply making balance fixes. It's unbelievable they haven't released a quick fix to solve these glaring issues. They did. It broke even more things. So they pulled it off and are working no permanent solution instead of knee jerk bandaid on cancer. Game is buggy atm, but its not gamebreaking. Yes, core system doesn't work, but it doesn't imbalance the game in any significant way, you just play like all squads had vet0. In: COH2 Bugs