Profile of Katitof

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/katitof


Thread: Let's Talk: ISG Performance19 Jul 2016, 08:12 AM Why aren't scatter values being mentioned? These are THE primary stat of indirect fire weapon defining their effectiveness more then anything else. As far as I've seen, ISG still uses heat seeking shells. You can't have indirect fire piece with good AoE and close to perfect accuracy. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: does damaging tanks give too much vet?19 Jul 2016, 06:45 AM Jump back to quoted post19 Jul 2016, 04:22 AMSmaug attacking veteren units gives more vet also. forexample if you build a stug and attack a vet0 sherman you get certain xp.. however if the sherman is vet3. you get 1.3x the vet from the hit instead of attacking a vet0 unit. Incorrect. You get 1.2 modifier for each vet star. So vet0 going for vet3 gets ~1.6 exp value. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: does damaging tanks give too much vet?18 Jul 2016, 17:22 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Jul 2016, 17:13 PMscratchedpaintjob not always! in vcoh you got zero xp for damaging, therefore only damaging a tank gave no xp. We're not talking vcoh here... yes, i may be logical in that sense, but there are other logics where it makes no sense, and besides, being logical doesnt mean being good for the game As long as its logical for balance, it does. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: What does the Future hold for CoH2?18 Jul 2016, 17:21 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Jul 2016, 13:32 PMHighfiveeeee To be honest if I am imagining the working situation at Relic I always think of something like this: Some people in an office, about 4-5 guys are still working on CoH2. All other resources are working on DoW. They know that they promised a 5 year plan but the game was a disappointment from the start and never ever met their expectations. About 5 hours of 40 per week are used on working at CoH2. Everything feels sluggish and is anything but enjoyable. Everything that has to be done is being done half-hearted. Just like taking out the trash but you know that it has to be done, otherwise things get even worse. CoH2's motor is dead. The developers don't have fun working on this game anymore. This hasn't started yesterday but a long time ago. I imagine the game like some child that started smoking and drinking with 16 and the parents are done with their son but yet they know that they have to carry for him for 2 more years... You have no idea how many developers would give an arm for population as big and as stable as the one CoH2 has. It might not be competitive MOBA or FPS level, but for its genre its pretty damn huge. Just look at the market, every other RTS game that isn't SC2 is dead within 6 months of release. CoH2 STILL keeps the 8-10 concurrent users after few years. Even SC2 is on a slide down and CoH is stable. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: does damaging tanks give too much vet?18 Jul 2016, 11:16 AM You get exp based on damage you deal and cost of target you attack. Infantry isn't valuable, tanks are because fuel is expensive. It was always like this and there is nothing wrong with it, its logical. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: What does the Future hold for CoH2?18 Jul 2016, 06:49 AM Jump back to quoted post18 Jul 2016, 01:38 AMThe Big Red 1 i just hope they dont make the same mistake when they make CoH 3. that and putting native language into the game ffs. it was an epic fail when they decided not to do it for CoH 2. They won't, because there won't be coh3. CoH without WW2 setting is not coh anymore and they wanted coh2 to be ultimate ww2 RTS platform. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: t34/85 is a bit too cheap17 Jul 2016, 22:50 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Jul 2016, 22:32 PMFiresparks except this mean that the t34/85 can kill infantry reliably with both its main gun and excellent machine gun. It is extremely relevant. As can any other med of this tier with exception of cromwell. And that was never an argument for other meds. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: su-85 needs high pop cost17 Jul 2016, 21:12 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Jul 2016, 21:08 PMFiresparks the su-85 got a huge boost in accuracy. .40 accuracy at far range is huge. and the su-85 also got a buff in terms of rotational rate and target size as well. the total sum of its buff outweight the nerf to rof. That's still a huge nerf in DPS vs meds even if you consider that. Rotation and target size do nothing about tank that isn't directly in front of you. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: t34/85 is a bit too cheap17 Jul 2016, 16:55 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Jul 2016, 16:35 PMStug life It's not that is under priced but the problem lies in the indirect buff it got , let's start: 1 now can pen any axis rear armor So can P4. Increase P4 price? 2 t34-76 mg buffed so t34 85 too Isn't really that relevant, because its main cannon can actually hit infantry. 3 volks blob gone Irrelevant. Pfaust and puppchen is just as lethal to it. 4 is in one of the best doc for all faction (motor guard) Irrelevant. Arguably, its the only soviet relevant doctrine since forever. Then has 800 hp and enough armor to make p4 bounce it EZ8 got even more, yet it costs pretty much the same. Both, 34/85 and ez8 are half tier above P4, so them being stronger then it isn't really an argument. They got discount, because they are doctrinal units that require tech structure, no other vehicle does. While having awesome rate of fire Only panther and TDs shoot slower. So it fits the meta too well Not really an argument. It fits meta, because its reliable. If you want to nerf units, because they fit meta, you'd have to nerf HMG42, all OKW inf call-ins, pretty much any unit that is reliable. It still get easily beaten by stug and jp4 In: COH2 Balance
Thread: t34/85 is a bit too cheap17 Jul 2016, 13:25 PM You do, but I wouldn't call them call-ins anymore as, well, they aren't that any longer. In: COH2 Balance