Profile of Katitof

It's not a direct resource conversion as it requires planes that could be shot down by the enemy fly over a point and drop supplies on it.

And the late game is a situation which you might not even reach in some well played circumstances.

I have yet to see a singular of these planes shot down ever since the ability was implemented.

I don't think it even can be shot down or its just a mark on minimap and then a drop spawn.

Soviet one can be shot down, ost one can be stolen due to need to drop it forward.

At this point people should clarify mostly if they are talking about 1v1, 2v2 or 3v3+ cause i'm not seeing the Churchills (or UKF) rolling over been the meta.

They probably steamroll over rank 4k team games axis players as these ones complained the most.
They apparently stomp over high knowledge, but low skill players who play at least 2v2 as well.

Anyway, churchill and current KV-1 are examples of well balanced heavies, maybe not in vet stats, but base stats are good, they fulfill the role, they are cost efficient, but not cheap at all and they have clear weakness to much cheaper units.

God I miss precision strike on 203mm B4 howitzer. It was so funny and hilarious to make people ragequit after you sniped a Panther + 5 pioneer squads in the fog of war

Show Spoiler

Yeah, however a day prior to removal of that ability was the last time we have seen it actually hit something we aimed at.

What post says:

Struggle means its hard for it to beat it, not impossible.
In the context it means long(time to kill) and the context is very clear to everyone who have read quoted post, response and whole sentence, not fixate himself on a singular word one doesn't seem to understand anyway.

What Vipper sees:

Struggle means its hard for it to beat it, not impossible.

What Katitof said that Vipper instantly proves to be correct:

You focus on trees so much that you can't see a forest in front of you.

If you want to argue someones post, make sure you are capable of understanding what is said there, not cherry picking stuff you want to attack, completely disregarding what was said prior or after, picking a single line completely out of any context, which proves you full of s***.

Churchill does not lose to P4 - fact.
Churchill does not have as claimed by certain axis only individual - overwhelming firepower - fact.
Churchills gun does not reliably penetrates vet2 ost P4 and OKW P4 - fact.
Churchill takes long to kill, therefore struggles against said P4s - fact.

You are ignoring actual argument to attack semantics and half sentences picked completely out of context of the whole discussion, again - fact.

The Churchill has the same Damage as PzIV and even higher penetration is most ranges.

The Churchill will "straggle to penetrate aka damage" against high armor unit like the KT the same way a PzIV will "straggle to penetrate aka damage" against high armor units like the IS-2.

Except IS-2 will not be bouncing off of P4 50% of the time.
Do you start to see the point or more illumination is needed?

It will not however straggle vs the OKW PzIV as the it was originally claimed, it will win in most cases.
The claim is simply false and misleading and will remain so no matter how much "smoke and mirrors" are used.

No one ever said it'll lose.
It will struggle(the word is struggle btw) against OKW P4 not like you struggle to grasp that simple argument, where it has completely no chance.

Struggle means its hard for it to beat it, not impossible.
In the context it means long and the context is very clear to everyone who have read quoted post, response and whole sentence, not fixate himself on a singular word one doesn't seem to understand anyway.
If it was impossible, I would say impossible.
Struggle is synnonymous to hard and opposite to easy.

I suggest to simply move on and stop trying to prove a false claim as correct.

The very moment you'll stop pretending there is something which isn't and falsely responding to it.
I hope with all my heart that with guidelines above on the meaning of a word you completely missed now you actually might get the idea.

You focus on trees so much that you can't see a forest in front of you.

Remeber:

Katitof NEVER Played Brits! He cant even imagine how good/ bad brits units are.

So stop discuss with him about brits units and play.


To topic: Church is the most efficent tank in game when look on its pricetag and stats. Combine it with a TD...and you will struggle hard vs this.

So we can now, by your very own logic, disregard every single thing you say that isn't directly about ost?
That'll save us so much time.