Profile of Katitof

I do not really see any fun in doctrine than can turtle up in FHQ or forward reinforcement/healing point get shock troops and ATG by CP 2 and then turtle up even more with KV-2 while being able to use 2 auras to buff its infantry.

So now you don't want DEFENSIVE doctrine to turtle, aka be defensive?
But turtling is thematically correct for DEFENSIVE doctrine.

And what 2 auras?
FHQ on ambient building isn't going to follow your army anywhere and is an active ability which will be not active 75% of the time.

AoE Oorah for 10 seconds can hardly be called an aura.

It does in fact replace the coaxial.

Yes, I got little ahead, however the 2nd part still stands, the hose had to be removed to use the gun.

You’re comparing a 6 man squad with 2 g43s, grenades, flares, and an at nade to literally engineers. Nice.

Pfussies get 3 G43s.

It is

If we pretend to ignore panther, which is specifically designed to counter high armor targets that is.
Just because its not called TD in the sense other TDs are, due to its ability to effectively engage infantry, doesn't mean its not top tier vehicle designed primarly to counter other vehicles with high armor specifically.

I think Overwatch could use a copy of sector artillery rather than leFH.

I also think KV-8 should be allowed to fire it's weak gun while also using the flamethrower, like the Crocodile. It's such a weak gun against armor anyway and the flamethrower is so much better vs infantry, so I don't see the point of the weapon toggle. It's the only vehicle in the game with a largely unused fire mode.

Then overwatch would be way too much of a muni strain. You couldn't use it because of goliath and vice versa.

In regards to KV-8, that's not possible, because contrary to churchill croc, KV-8 uses same barrel for cannon and flamer, while churchills flamer was mounted on the hull. Yes, soviets literally plugged fuel hose to gun barrel and started going wild with it.

It however could go same way as churchill went and its cannon could be improved.
Not damage obviously, but I'd personally go with either RoF or penetration. Its more obvious way then buffing flamer in any way and with its new vet, its durable enough once it reaches it.

why not make schrecka copy from zoooks. and let them get access to all axis infantery? like allies can? sounds fair and will not be op ....we see it every day on allie infantery.

How's all these replays and casts of USF using zook bus are coming up?
Still looking for them or still can't give another example over the single clip stuve did, yet you stubbornly claim is meta?

And sure, if you are up to decrease efficiency of your infantry weapons by 50% while keeping the cost the same(as shrecks cost same as zooks now), sure, go for it.

Now, which you'd like to go with the package?
Dual LMGs of crappy performance or LMG limit to 1 and still lower performance of current lmg42 while keeping higher cost?

Will all allied also get stock 280 armor T4 med and 180-234 armor T3 med too?

Can you stop making ass pulls while ignoring literally whole faction design and the difference of targets just to regurgitate your agendas our way?

Generally, pfussies are fine. They most certainly do not lack any AT upgrade nor should they ever get it, they already are loaded with all the utility like nades, fausts, flares, increased sight, permasprint at vet5.

If you want to use heavy infantry play, pfussies are the go to unit.
Why people think they lack anything is beyond me.
They go well against all allied infantries, flares and sight range assure you always have good scouting and won't be surprised by anything that isn't exploiting LOS blockers to its advantage, are good at all ranges and scale really well.

The only "bad" thing about using them is you should get kubel and/or MG34 after 2nd volk instead of bashing your forehead against V button to HQ.