1 Nov 2019, 12:03 PM45thPOTUS
this is blatant ally fanboyism. this is a rts GAME, has nthing to do with historical accuracy. the zisgun is the soviet ANTITANK gun, not a arty piece. there is no other AT gun in the game that has the ability to throw out nukes to counter inf while having the ability to anti tank as well. this ability needs to be nerfed.
if we r talking about history, the zis gun should not be able to penetrate the tiger 2 at all frontally and obvs that is not the case here.
Guess what, a WWII game that has nothing to do with historical accuracy is a bad game that gets a lot of hate (see Battlefield V). It's not blatant allied fanboyism if we simply just point out how weapons were used historically.
Through your line of reasoning, it should be okay to give Conscripts AKMs or US Rifles M16s because it's "just a game, has nothing to do with historical accuracy." This is a WWII game. If you don't like or care about seeing WWII history represented then play something else.
Fact of the matter is that ZiS-3 barrage is fine. It has basis in real life history and also isn't overperforming. ZiS-3 barrage is hardly a squad wiper for competent players that can simply move their infantry out of the way. If anything, its minimum range is the only thing that should be nerfed.