i wasnt the guy who brought the church into this discussion. I only suggest that the compared tank(church) maybe isnt fair..because its to strong for its pricetag. thats why it is abused by so many players
Comparison of KV-1 to churchill is valid for the thread.
Whining how hard life is when churchill is on field and exaggerating about its performance is not. |
maybe you should install the game and play it to make posts about the balance from this game. Maybe than someone take you seriously
Maybe you should use less contradicting and false statements in an attempt to derail the thread and actually haul your ass to create a thread for something you have a problem with? Preferably on strategy forum as that's where all of your problems originate from. |
not the kv1 is weak..church is to strong...1400hp, high armor, ok mobilty, smoke to save the ass, very good AI, cann deal with panther and other heavys (can life long enough to soap all dmg while other make the dmg to heavy armor) and relativ cheap price. to is to good ..compared with the brits possbiltys ( 17pounders, FF, great 6 pounder, etc etc)
So go and make another "nerf churchil" thread and be laughed at there.
This is about KV-1, which at the very least needs heavy tank tailored vet. |
140 f for a 7hit, 270 armor sponge, yes that's cheap. Churchill is 160f for an 8hit 240 armor sponge and requires further tech.
Please oh great one, shin upon us the logic, which led you to believe a 400 EHP difference is 1 shot difference. |
I dont really understand how that can be abused. Im being honest i dont have a clue.
Ironically, in the very exact same way a barrel change for HMG42 was "abused" by allied soldiers to sturm and kill it. |
|
SU-76 is not enough of a TD and too much of muni strain to build it over standard ZiS3 + SU-85, even if you're in a pinch, its better to wait for 85 then build 76. Barrage nerf is what killed it. |
And as you already pointed out, the Churchill still has another 400 effective health on top of that.
The fact that we're even listing repair speed as one of the features of the KV1 kinda tells you everything you need to know. The kv1 got that bonus in the first place because it wasn't worth the repair time, much less the cost...
And on top of that, churchill has heavy engineers repairing it fast anyway AND it still has much better gun. |
Based on your extensive game play experience?
Based on what you can see at literally every 1v1 and 2v2 stream. |
It should be reduced reload then, instead of damage reduction. Fighting a cheap tank that can bring itself to Churchills level of HP would be very tedious.
140 fuel is cheap now?
Also, KV-1 problem isn't durability, but pitiful firepower, a flanking gun on a platform that can't flank. |
Yeah Pz4's dont agree with you...
P4s so weak, both axis faction field them in every single game. |
Relic Entertainment
