Profile of Katitof

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/katitof


Thread: ir Stg for stormtrooper instead of G43's9 Dec 2019, 09:47 AM Jump back to quoted post8 Dec 2019, 22:37 PMHannibal I disagree with that. Why should the elite troop doctrine not have access to cutting edge infantry weaponry? Because its concealed infiltration ambush infantry and they wouldn't really want to go around with the bulkiest weapon setup of WW2 that isn't considered LMG/HMG? Have you seen british commandos? Do you believe Stens are cutting edge weapons? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: State of the Soviets8 Dec 2019, 12:49 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Dec 2019, 12:11 PMButcher Again, the JP IV needs better penetration and the StuG needs a better vet 2 bonus (vet 2 is almost useless). This would already go a long way to balance allied heavy tanks. JP4 can penetrate 100% of the time almost all of its intended targets, only exception is easy8. If there is something bigger, JP4 is not intended counter to it. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: british forward HQ glider cost pop!? 7 Dec 2019, 23:20 PM Well, I do agree that something crazy needs to be removed. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Stats from the WCS 20197 Dec 2019, 14:56 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Dec 2019, 14:52 PMmrgame2 It is no excuse. It is about having units that have clear oppressing advantages. Where were units that have clear, oppressing advantage against TDs again? You know, ATGs and AT infantry? Besides, relic has pivoted to make Wehr support teams much easier to kill/decrew. Please, explain to us all how its easier to decrew wehr support teams then USF or UKF or OKW support teams, we all want to know. You speak as if ATg and SCAS are freely available to pop out. Or Wehr have cheaper units to throw out and flank a 60Td assualt Ironic. Where are Atg? Costs constrain, KV8, IS2, Incendiary..and..much easier to get decrew by Allies infantry with their dps fire on move...katsuya... pak howie...Pak slow ass reposition vs incoming tanks... Sorry i doubt paks will the day since pak are easy targets. You speak as if KV-8, incendiary, katy, pak howie are freely available to pop out. Or allies have cheaper units to throw out and decrew 60 range ATGs under fire of LMG grens, PGs, HMG42, Pwerfer, brummbar and Tiger. In: Lobby
Thread: Stats from the WCS 20197 Dec 2019, 14:46 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Dec 2019, 14:42 PMmrgame2 Where are Atg? Costs constrain, KV8, IS2, Incendiary..and..much easier to get decrew by Allies infantry with their dps fire on move... The main show is how easy for 60Td to just walk in and clear Axis 'heavy armor' tanks these days. Low risk high rewards. So frustrating you cant fight back cos you are as so short. And axis had frag bombs to stun all these TDs and SCAS to easily destroy them. You're making excuses for a perfect example of what happens if you don't bring ATGs or don't even attempt to flank mass TDs. Sorry, relic can't patch bad army compositions just because few handicapped players are incapable of getting X when opponent gets Y. In: Lobby
Thread: Stats from the WCS 20197 Dec 2019, 14:25 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Dec 2019, 14:16 PMmrgame2 Why have units uncounterable? Units are counterable. You being incapable of that doesn't change it. 60TD Ez mode here. 45:32 mark Tightrope mentioned shreks, but at 60 range, how hard to make the pgren run and gun the distance. Where are axis anti tank guns? Where is axis infantry? Do you see these massive empty unprotected flanks on left and right of the map? Where was SCAS? You know when units are uncounterable? When you don't build counters to them, or have counters on other side of the map, as evidenced by that vid you gave as "proof". In: Lobby
Thread: State of the Soviets7 Dec 2019, 09:06 AM Jump back to quoted post7 Dec 2019, 08:39 AMSander93 Only the IS-2's armor is a problem, so making Panthers and Jagdpanzer IVs better against all other high armor targets too for no reason is not a good solution. The IS-2 would still do fine against Raketens (200/190/180 pen) with ~340 armor and 1080 hitpoints. There's no reason it needs to have 375 armor when Axis lack high penetration (and high DPM/range) tank destroyers. The question here is, what would be IS-2 identity then? It already got lower range, less DPS, loses to a tiger in 1v1, so what would it have over Tiger? Because if its supposed to be nothing, then I can't see why its firepower and range shouldn't match Tiger as well. Tiger used to be the damage monster while IS-2 was unbreakable shield with meh firepower, wouldn't losing that part of identity make it impotent again compared to tiger? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF med truck needs to be replaced6 Dec 2019, 23:33 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Dec 2019, 22:32 PMVipper Ambulance cost 250/10 222 is 200/30 HT is 200/30 Again how it is that "sacrificing a 222 or a halftrack is more than a good trade" since the unit killed cost only 50 manpower more the unit lost and only 1/3 of the fuel? Umm.......... because you HAVE TO REBUILD that ambulance, making you spend 500mp and 20fu on healing alone in total, while 222 is not going to be rebuild and it already most likely had some kills on infantry, more then paying for itself? Also, possible additional attrition due to temporary lack of healing? For someone pretending to be so extremely smart about CoH stuff, you really can't see obvious stuff. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Tank hunter doctrine underpowered6 Dec 2019, 13:18 PM That's arrival delay time, not plane speed. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: State of the Soviets6 Dec 2019, 13:17 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Dec 2019, 13:01 PMthekingsown10 The maxim either needs a reduction to 5 men or have its suppression nerfed. There is no excuse for a 6 man squad to have that much suppression with a super fast set up time to boot. Update your game, you still seem to be on 2015 year version. In: COH2 Balance