Profile of Katitof

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/katitof


Thread: Relic, Please make all T-34/85 single call-in29 Apr 2014, 09:53 AM Jump back to quoted post29 Apr 2014, 09:35 AMUGBEAR Same goes for Puma Sherman Tiger ISU-152 Elefant AssGen, Stugs, this argument is really irrelevant. None of above suffers from a double-call in. New random osttruppen do but that would be arguing for the sake of arguing really. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Thoughts about new patch29 Apr 2014, 09:50 AM Jump back to quoted post29 Apr 2014, 09:19 AM__deleted__ I can't agree here. Any squad who broke the rule of cover - even shocks (highest armor value in the game) - were cut down. Exception was when 3-4 blobbed squads were attacking one squad, then, of course, they could easily overrun the squad in cover. But that's past now. Actually, in march deployment patch anything could close in on conscripts and kill them effortlessly, because they were shooting blanks for a month. You could run negative cover with pios and still beat cons easily. It is only now that you can't do it anymore. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: ISU-15229 Apr 2014, 08:47 AM Jump back to quoted post29 Apr 2014, 08:07 AMPorygon I would like to see the balance when ele & ISU lose their sight and need spotter, that will make the game more interesting than an "I own the map" button. Do the same for ele and I'm sold on the idea. edit: after rereading I have decided it is the highest of times to get myself that morning coffee. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Relic, Please make all T-34/85 single call-in29 Apr 2014, 08:46 AM Actually, the biggest difference between single and double call-in is, single call-in allows you to get a T3 or T4 unit and you will still afford single call-in, if you go for that with double call-in, 34-85s will not arrive before tiger. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Was ram nerfed?29 Apr 2014, 08:14 AM Why do you need a pool for that? Patch notes too hard? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Blitzkrieg is pretty useless now28 Apr 2014, 21:56 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Apr 2014, 21:38 PM__deleted__ you're right, no more cost effectiveness for german armor. Just for soviet armor. Maybe you can enlighten us how we should use the actual crappy german armor, in order not to be in every game overrun by hordes of t34s and shermans. I am open to any suggestion, because personally I cannot find a solution at the moment. Oh but thats easy to answer! Exactly the same way soviets always had, together with PaK and gren support and a mine here and there. I'm winning almost effortlessly 2v2s with T34s, because german players are still stuck in the last patch, thinking a single panther or tiger will fend off any number of advancing tanks. Well, not the case anymore, 2 T34/76 are more effective then a single panther as well as they cost more, time to use superior mobility and range because relaying on armor and health alone isn't the "go to" way anymore. Spamming panthers with no infantry AT support will guarantee you a loss, because numbers do matter now on the soviet side. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: The new Stug IIIG28 Apr 2014, 21:51 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Apr 2014, 21:41 PM__deleted__ Really? Did anyone actualy killed with "the new improved stug" anything else than a lost rabbit? If so, I would like a replay. I think you should break your holy vow and play soviets. Have it used against you and you'll come here screaming OP instantly. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: ISU-15228 Apr 2014, 21:50 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Apr 2014, 21:41 PMSenseo1990 Because countering combined arms (fortunately) requires combined arms. And to counter MGs you rush them with random infantry units? Countering combined arms requires combined arms and some thought to it, for example attacking from the side that isn't dug in to annihilate your advance. Where is your arty to dispose of ZiSes and infantry? Where is your reckon plane to know how you can approach it? Where is your flank? Many people make it seem like it, but in truth maps don't turn into thin tunnels with no obstacles the moment ISU hits the field. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: ISU-15228 Apr 2014, 20:45 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Apr 2014, 20:28 PMDarthBong420 Sounds like alot the Soviet fanboys think since they cant take on a elephant with a t34 and cons that its op. This thread has so much soviet biased hyperbole. Ummm, this thread is here because german fanboys think since they can't take ISU with infantry and paks that its op... Can you see the irony? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Blitzkrieg is pretty useless now28 Apr 2014, 17:41 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Apr 2014, 17:03 PMPorygon PG is a joke in this patch, so as overnerfed panther. So are you telling me if I don't choose Pak43 or Elefant I can't counter this uberassualtgun reverse faster than blitzing P4? Fun isn't it? When german tanks are suddenly equal to soviet tanks they are "overnerfed". Well, too bad that this is how it will be from now on. German armor is not meant to be more cost effective anymore. I'm telling you if you won't adapt and still relay on old things you will keep loosing. For some odd reason you believe that tanks should frontally kill dedicated tank destroyers, until your mindset won't change, you will keep loosing to better players, because now, I need to say it again, the armor of both factions is equal and AT guns and infantry based AT got better. Time to use combined arms and if you need ele or pak43 to counter SU-85 then you're few months behind in terms of adaptation. In: COH2 Gameplay