Profile of Katitof

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/katitof


Thread: Relic, the Community, and the NDA8 May 2015, 10:46 AM Jump back to quoted post7 May 2015, 20:58 PMAlexzandvar You need idiots to help test things. Ever heard of the phrase "idiot proofing"? Explains why they got you before Hans. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: The root of Grenadiers' being disadvantaged before LMG42s:2 May 2015, 20:00 PM Rifles deal 10 dmg per shot. Same as volks and penals. Also rotfl about assumption that 5 out of 6 cons will hit anything with their accuracy. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Remove free lieutenant1 May 2015, 12:42 PM Jump back to quoted post1 May 2015, 12:16 PMAerohank Ostheer auto-unlocks panzerfaust, grenades, LMGs, shreks and all their infantry units for a total investment of 400mp and 80 fuel with 20 starting fuel. USF needs something to counter-balance this fact. Either the free LTD stays, or the grenades/zooks/BARs upgrades need to be removed and unlocked for free as part of teching as the Ostheer get them. Otherwise we'll get the same fiasco as we got with Ostheer vs Soviet teching at release, except this time there are no doctrinal units to fill the gaps. That pretty much sums it up. Strip axis from upgrades by default, make them side costs, make the teching cheaper in return(not needed for OKW as its cheapest in game already) and see how happy they will be. In: Lobby
Thread: Axis Goliath1 May 2015, 12:14 PM Jump back to quoted post1 May 2015, 11:53 AMausterlitz Why soviet have call-in is-2s? Tiger. That was easy. KT is no longer worth it for price sadly.U can get 2-2.5 is-2s by that time.Why soviets have so much iwin cheese? Then don't build it if you think so. Its not the only tank OKW have. I believe T34/76 is not worth its price, still there are people making them, some even have some success. Why soviets don't need to tech?Why americans get free units?Why ost has to build teching structures with pios in base? Ost skips tech just as well. This is way too easy for me. Why axis squads are so much easier to wipe? Because allied armor with exception of a single tank are much easier to destroy. I'll grab a popcorn and sit comfortably while you try to explain to my why 240mp is more then 320mp/100fu. Grass isn't greener on this side either.Stick to topic without trying to divert with ur normal useless antics. Thank you for repeating my point, here, have a cookie. And I'll add as much relevant examples as it takes for narrow minds like yours to grasp the idea. Who needs anti-blob more?Soviets now blobbingw ith PTRS,Americans greatest blobbers with ober nerf.Allies just as bad blobbers as axis,perhaps even more. Why are you crying about 120mm and demos wiping squads in on thread and asking for it for axis in other? And its not like axis don't have anti blob options. Pin plane anyone? Sturmtiger? You certainly do not need to spam panthers when you're facing infantry blobs. You have different anti blob options. Its called asymmetrical balance. But they have the tools to counter blobbing easily.Scotts,120 mm,katyushas,easy sov minespam,HE sherman etc. For axis its largely stukas for OKW ,which will lock out armor,pzwerfer tech issue and poor performance,brumbbar locked out and huge price,mgs overrun with ease once blob hits critical mass.Sturmtiger ..lol.Mortars can't wipe.No minespam. On top of this allies get demos?Why?Its completely justified given the current allied blobbing..that goliath be introduced or demos be removed altogether. Either answer to point or don't bother. I already did. Just because you have chosen to be blind and deaf about my answer and ignore it, repeating the question like a retarded kid regardless how many times you'll get answered doesn't mean its not there. And no, medium tanks are not blob counters, perhaps you have forgotten where shreck upgrade button is? Now you answer me, why you bitch about demos and 120mm wiping squads and then ask for the same things for axis, because to me you are not looking for a balance, but supremacy. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Axis Goliath1 May 2015, 11:43 AM Jump back to quoted post1 May 2015, 11:31 AMBulgakov A) In the question I posed it was not said that they should remove demo from allies or giving it to the axis and nothing else be changed. You jumped to that conclusion yourself. B) There is an absolutely logical reason why sometimes something can be taken away without something being given in return! Have you ever balanced weights on a scale? If you put too much on one side, you should take something away from said side. Then perhaps you should take that into account next time you form such question/suggestion. Your weight example is perfect in this case. You can't propose putting something on the other side without taking something from there first or if you take something from one side, you should take something from another so the weight checks out. You seem to be making a critical mistake of assuming the weights aren't balanced right now. You have demos on one side and multiple, effective non doctrinal infantry and armor upgrades on the other. For allies, losing demo would not make them too weak to compete. It would just level the playing field and remove one of the most frustrating features of the game. You realize the same can be said about literally every single thing axis have for them that allies don't and it will be equally valid, right? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: British Faction, what do you want to see?1 May 2015, 11:17 AM Jump back to quoted post1 May 2015, 11:12 AMBrick Top They could do a fresh take on officers. USF officers are fresh take on officers. Anything else then that kind of solution will encourage blobbing and I doubt we need another faction going by that "playstyle"(lol at people saying blobs take skill). And your solution isn't suitable for coh2 at all. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Axis Goliath1 May 2015, 11:10 AM Jump back to quoted post1 May 2015, 11:06 AMBulgakov You didn't answer his question, you just posed a very ambiguous rhetorical question and changed the topic. Because the "asymmetrical balance" answer which is the obvious one would be instantly dismissed, so I've decided it will be better to point out that there are good things on axis side which allies can dream off. There is no logical reason why something should be taken from allies or given to axis without taking something from axis or giving it to allies in return. I have also answered that already before in the thread. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Should OKW get a heavy artillery piece?1 May 2015, 09:57 AM Jump back to quoted post1 May 2015, 09:54 AMOmega_Warrior Why should they get a non doctrinal heavy arty when no other faction has one? On top of fastest and cheapest teching. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Axis Goliath1 May 2015, 09:22 AM Jump back to quoted post1 May 2015, 08:55 AMausterlitz Why allies alone should have demo? USF and PTRS blob is no worse than OKW,and OH blob is calling for squadwipes. Either remove all demos,or give goliath.Agree. Why axis should have panthers? Why axis should have stock KT? Why axis doesn't need to pick doctrine or go back to base for upgrades? Why almost every axis unit have upgrades? Grass isn't greener. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Do you think this alpha should be in waves?30 Apr 2015, 22:27 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Apr 2015, 22:03 PMJackiebrown They said that about WFA alpha, doesn't mean there is going to be more waves but there is a possibility. To be honest it would surprise me if they didn't just based on the demand. The quote is literally 48 hours old. If my memory serves me right, there was no WFA alpha within last 48 hours. In: Lobby