Profile of CookiezNcreem

Avatar Area

Offline United States
Posts: 3052 | Subs: 15

General Information
Register Time: 19 Dec 2013, 18:31 PM
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/CookieZR6
Website: http://steamcommunity.com/groups/USFOPCOH2/members
Steam: 76561198094724817
Residence:

United States
Nationality:

United States
Timezone: America/Indiana/Knox
Game Name: CookiezNcreem

Show Latest Posts


Thread: Alex's Guide to using Booby Trap26 Aug 2015, 00:13 AM ~ ~ Im decent friends with lelex,i just troll him daily. enjoy his guide/memo/tip/ there is no issue. It was just a joke every 1 calm In: OKW Strategies
Thread: Captain costs 50 manpower to reinforce?25 Aug 2015, 22:01 PM Jump back to quoted post25 Aug 2015, 21:57 PMMr. Someguy He's also the worst one dispite being the highest rank. ~~Force retreat is OP tho~~ Fuck I misread That smoke ability and concentrate fire is OP And for 240 mp In: COH2 Balance
Thread: M26 Pershing/Calliope Debate25 Aug 2015, 21:08 PM Jump back to quoted post25 Aug 2015, 20:46 PMBurts Using tank traps as green cover does not work againts MGs, (sandbags dont work either) as the MG user simply needs to click a-move on the structure of the tank trap, and the squad will be suppresed due to how fucked the suppresion values are It still reduces damage from explosives,which is the main point of it In: Lobby
Thread: M26 Pershing/Calliope Debate25 Aug 2015, 19:08 PM No thats just your non justified opinion, stats say otherwise In: Lobby
Thread: Favorite AT Gun25 Aug 2015, 18:28 PM Jump back to quoted post25 Aug 2015, 18:27 PMTobis If I'm playing as allies the Pak 40 is the best. If I'm playing as axis the US 57mm is the best. Allies need that extra penetration, axis need that bigger arc and fast firing rate. The M-42 is obviously the coolest AT gun there is, no doubt. This this this. As axis nothing better than autopenning all USF tanks with take aim Dat ROF Dat Arc But as USF,nothing better than TWPin' on a tiger ace In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Captain costs 50 manpower to reinforce?25 Aug 2015, 18:16 PM From a realistic standpoint Because it would be silly if a Captain was easier to replace than some random private. From a gameplay standpoint, its fucking pointless,Only because relic hates USF. Because im pretty sure arty officer and ~~sturm officer~~ dont reinforce for 50 mp,despite being higher ranks than the captain Edit sturm reinf for 50 while the ost arty officer despite being a higher rank than all of them only reinforce for 30. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: M26 Pershing/Calliope Debate25 Aug 2015, 18:06 PM Jump back to quoted post25 Aug 2015, 17:19 PMAlexzandvar If all these bugs were fixed your logic would be sound, and lol @ you admitting the MG34 is worthless. I actually play USF I actually use the 50 cal in game situations the 50 cal saves my ass in alot of these games You dont do any of that Not to say these arent some pretty retarded bugs that should be fixed,but Weapon priority value set wrong so it will get decrewed by PaKs and other antitank weapons very easily Do you park raketenwerfers,shrek volks, or paks in front of 50 cals and riflemen? focus_fire: true so it does a notable amount less DPS than other HMGs considering its other stats. I dont care about damage because I want it to suppress more than anything. Riflemen do good damage,and my 50 cal doctrine says "never leave it alone" Vet2 removes all the aoe suppression and incremental accuracy changes HMGs were given But 50 cals are bad and dont do damage;how do they ever get to vet 2? What about vet 3 alecruzz? Gun has 10 armor instead of 70 so gets gun destroyed fast by mortars and nades (35 pen) if it gets decrewed and if it does you're unlucky or you misplayed,as I said before Worst long range penetration of any HMG in the game (1.0) I dont use the 50 cal to counter light vehicles and I never have Now would fixing all these bugs be nice? Would killing 222s with 50 cals be nice? yes,it would be amazeballs. But is the 50 cal serviceable even with these bugs?Yeah,it is. because I use it. Do you want hard digital evidence of a USF using the worthless totally suck 50 cals to hold back infantry? ? In: Lobby
Thread: M26 Pershing/Calliope Debate25 Aug 2015, 14:41 PM Jump back to quoted post25 Aug 2015, 11:15 AMBeefSurge I don't really get how you can think the .50 cal is good, sure it suppresses infantry but it costs a lot to reinforce, doesn't do good damage to squads, and is overpriced. Because I use it alot The 50 cal is fine. It also has pretty good damage... (At least it's not an MG34 )If reinforce cost Is an issue, recrew with echelons if it ends up dying. Mine only die from leig snipes,turbomortar,I decided to a-move it into obers from laziness, or because i left it alone or wounded somewhere, or 2-3 rifle nades into a lone MG, because if it's supported, the supporting rifles can still win the engagement. In other words, typical allied MG deaths. And I simply can't go without it anymore,"it's that good." enemy is suppressed before seeing MG because spotter, I walk up with bar riflez, shoot suppressed squads. Enemy does this sequence 3 times, gets mad, gets a Stuka, starts firing angry rifle nades,etc. I don't lose 50 cals to paks, haven't lost an entire gun because of its 10 armor because getting to decrewed is your fault,nor does having 2 50 cals suddenly insta bleed me.. At worst you have to reinforce 2 models per retreat. I mean come on. Put it in yellow cover and Throw a nade on it and recrew if its that bad. 50 cal is aloooooot better than it used to be. That I'm certain of. In: Lobby
Thread: M26 Pershing/Calliope Debate25 Aug 2015, 03:47 AM In: Lobby
Thread: M26 Pershing/Calliope Debate25 Aug 2015, 02:56 AM Jump back to quoted post24 Aug 2015, 23:16 PMAlexzandvar Iv never said I was against adding the Xylophone, but the Katyusha isn't mandatory in 2v2. go away The Sherman also has better AI performance meaning it can kill AT guns (especially clumped Racktens) as well as non-doctrinal smoke. The PIV is a more defensive oriented tank. go away Panthers are never a good idea versus USF, ever. seriously,go away Fausts don't engine damage on the first hit, and of course you have emergency repairs to abuse at your leisure. it does 100 damage,and who does repair critical in the middle of a tank fight in front of grens It's got more bugs than a roach hotel. Like it loses all the MG buffs at vet 2 and it dies to Paks and has bugged reinforce due to the gun costing nothing. It has a laundry list of problems. At vet 0/bugged/up your wannabeCruzz ass, it performs JUST fine since i use and ACTUALLY see it used it to good effect. it SUPPRESSES INFANTRY Who honestly cares if a pak can snipe it,the fact that I dont care to know that,nor has it happened to me lately,tells you how important that little stat is.... Also your instance the MG34 is fine, while also insisting the .50 cal is shows you need to study the stats, files, and mechanics a tad more. Especially for someone with a blue tag. I study the actual gameplay because I play the game more than I SHITpost .org and dig for pointless statistics. You have evolved so much,and so often, since your very first shitpost. It started with throwing in the WRONG stats,constantly being proven wrong ,getting owned by QueenRatchet in a 1v1 , pure noob argument shitposts like "smoke is useless vs good playerzzz",and,now,after being owned so many times,you think because you finally looked in the attribute editor a couple times,and gained a decent rank in a ladder barely anyone plays ,that you can base your entire arguement off "did you know MG34 has less DPS than my dick in the morning?,im rank 152 okdubyaa,i got gud" funfacts. Again, I don't disagree but I don't want Relic to address basic faction problems with DLC. who said it had to be dlc,lets make it all stock babe. Please dont make me derail this thread having yet another shitpost fest with you. You trigger me daily with your responses. Please In: Lobby