|
Where do you get that I want something buffed because its missing something?
I most certainly do not.
I was only explaining why it is potentially possible for an ability to cost less than it is actually worth, simply because part of its cost is losing access to a different type of strong unit or ability.
I.e. it is ok to get stronger cons at a cheap price, in light of missing out on heavy tanks.
Yeah from what you've said, it's a simple misunderstanding of English, maybe my phrase only works in this country, so sorry if that's confused it.
What you explain is exactly what that phrase means. I didn't mean anything else by it.
I'm not trying to be personal either, I know your trying to make a point, it's just the language in a lot of your posts is a little over inforcive, that's the only 'offensive bit'. |
|
Ad hominem? Arguing with me the meaning of ''missing out on something'' is ad hominem in itself.
Your example of the tool box is very exactly what I am describing by saying ''missing out of something''
If you've understood it to mean something else, that's why I said maybe its a language thing.
To put it very clearly, that statement simply means you cannot now have it, which is a simple matter of fact.
Why are you always so keen to jump rather aggressively on anyone you disagree with, over rather small and insignificant things like the meaning of a figure of speach.
You have some good points, but it's your manner, at times that gets people's backs up. |
|
Nullist, are you insane dude?
If I chose one doc without say Shocks, I cannot call them in, say opponent then spams PGs I've missed my opportunity to call shocks.
Yes I am missing out on calling shocks.
No that does not mean I want everything at once. Simply the opposite, that I can't.
This is how the docs are balanced, put certain good stuff in, miss out on others.
In practise, the price of Ppsh may be appropriate because you are choosing not to have access to any heavy tank. (Basic example)
If ''missing out on something'' does not make sence to you maybe it's a language thing , nothing to get upset about. |
|
Even if something is really good though (in a doctrine), it doesn't nesecarily have to cost a certain amount.
Examples:
radio intercept, totally free.
Pak camo, totally free.
The pak one in particular is a huge buff in damage, but it's free. You could say that's imba, but it's not because its balanced within the doctrine, what you get and what your missing out on.
|
|
Yeah because all those saved munis = a lot of molotovs, which should be thrown constantly if your spamming cons.
There still can be reward, but its more micro and harder to pull. So thats quite good.
Rather than turning each con squad pretty much into shocks. |
|
I just think guards wont overperform vs infantry when their alternative is Shocks and you have access to penals, which really have quite high DPS. |
|
At this stage Im feeling super happy with myself than I was never a big Ppsh guy, and dont have to adapt to life without them. |
Im only kidding, I wouldnt really advocate hulling down an Elefant. You would have to have a very narrow choke for enemy tanks.
It would make it super hard to kill thou  |
|
I agree cons feel a lot weaker now, I think its mostly down to early G43s.
I very rarley used Ppsh before patch, so its not that.
Do not underestimate penals now, they are very good to have against G43 grens. |
|
I think this map totally favoures Germans, esspecially from top. I mean it was designed to be a camp defence map in ToW for Germans.
I've played 1 games so far (as bottom) and 2 MGs easily owned me. I'm going to have to play a load more before making my mind up though.
as far as I can tell, you need to rush north just to get a bridge head in the town, and just send an engie off to cap your side. |
0
Charlie Dont Surf
Relic Entertainment
