Profile of elchino7

Here’s a joke for you. 4 Volks walk into a Vickers and run away screaming. 4 volks run into a Maxim and recrew it.

Those Volks should wait for happy hour. Get some random light cover going around.

It's funny you have a WC pic and talk about 7 years and complaining the game is still "totally imbalanced".

While i would love to see some other changes been applied, that remarks lacks what an imbalanced game looks like at all.

The game is playable non meta wise, because non doctrinal options had been improved. 2013 to 2017 sends their regards.

Your complains are also totally dependable on which game mode you play.
For major teamgames: it's since release till UKF was released in favour of Axis and till they patch out all the BS from UKF in favour of Allies.
For 2v2: it was back n forth with different metas.
For 1v1: back n forth with different factions been the stronger ones.


Finally: there's no such things as "early or late game factions". The extremes had been toned down, be it weakness or strengths.

The whole processes is confusing:
Show Spoiler

It's not too confusing.

We had Penals with flamers which were OP cause they would have a follow up in Guards. But the tier without OP Penals wouldn't really work cause either sniper/M3 are too AI oriented with limited timeframes. IIRC we were also living in mobile defense/222 OH sniper meta.
Therefore the design was to remove the flamer and give the tier some soft AT (i would had preferred an M42 AT gun).
I have advocated that after AT Penals design was established, that they could easily make them pay for both the normal satchel and the AT upgrade by linking it to the HQ upgrades as a way to nerf Penal strats when they were too strong.

The units you mentioned not been used as much are ALL a result of the units been nerfed. The M42 was never used till it got a rework. Guards saw META used then nerfed to see no use and then buffed to a decent level once again. 120mm became a bad unit comparatively before all the other mortar nerfs. Dhsk saw use depending how strong the commander it is in the respective meta. Su76 saw a decay on use after multiple nerfs to stop their spam.


If the point is nerfing slightly the faction, the cost of T2 could just be rollbacked. But that would do nothing to stop Maxim spam (if you are saying it could get some buffs if it appears later in the game). Even if you are delaying time construction by a bit, if the unit is good to be built early on, it would still be spammed with a 2x CE opening. It might had the same issues as Penals opening (giving up map control) but it would probably bring issues on 3v3+.


The only sensible type of buff the unit could receive, it's around T3/T4 timing depending on how good the buff on the unit it could be. Which would be mitigated by other faction having more tools and the map having more random light cover spread out.

https://www.coh2.org/forum/108/the-library

There you have it guys, if you want to keep the discussion open a thread or use PMs.

Any further political/historical debate will be met with Exterminatus and punish will be delivered on those accounts in the name of the Emperor.

Suppression and accuracy have almost no meaningful correlation despite some claims otherwise. Tests have been made both for against this theory and I think generally speaking the case is much more conclusive that there is no correlation. I think mainly the Maxim's ROF and to a degree burst time should remain exactly the same at all ranges and it's DPS should be balanced around accuracy. This way suppression remains more or less constant as well. The Maxim actually attains decently high rof and therefore suppression at point blank range.

On the open or yellow cover, when using a single source of suppression against a SINGLE squad, it is meaningless. With other units which can provide suppression it might break the suppression threshold but it is not something you can really play around.

Reducing damage also means a nerf against light vehicles.

Increasing accuracy wouldn't do jack shit in the video example.