Profile of ZombiFrancis

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 2742

General Information


Thread: Nerf the panzerwerfer already16 Feb 2016, 00:53 AM I don't usually need katyushas versus Ostheer. Their infantry is squishy enough and they can't default to schreck blobs if you get the fuel advantage. It's those 5 man volks with Schrecks that pretty much delete the efficacy of virtually all Allied armor. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Very low cost of OKW tech tree.16 Feb 2016, 00:42 AM OKW are weak against maxims until their first tier building is up and they can huck incendiary nades for death spiral funtimes for the maxim. Nothing like watching 5 men run back into the fire one by one to start pushing the maxim again. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Rails and metals mirroring16 Feb 2016, 00:39 AM The territory points don't really match up to the original map's design. They're not really balanced around the maps layout. If you're interested in what Rails and Metal's original design you can try this little mod I made: The tuning pack: http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=604491510 The compatible Rails and Metal map: http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=605629152 In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Increase AEC's price from 50 to 70 fuel14 Feb 2016, 17:22 PM See, I feel like the AEC is attempting to occupy the same spot that the M8 Greyhound did for Americans in vCoH. Which, right now it kind of does. The problem is it comes as a choice between it and the Bofors as a side tech, not as a choice to go all-in on tech investment. It doesn't come out in a way that has any strategic implications for the Brits. It's always an easy fallback choice, rather than a hard to achieve goal. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Will nerf-buff BS ever be over?14 Feb 2016, 17:09 PM That means someone at the office has to sit down and do all that work. I think they had Brad do that and all he ended up doing was make the AEC what it is now. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The Maxim HMG needs a hotfix.13 Feb 2016, 18:39 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Feb 2016, 12:49 PMHighfiveeeee First thing I would like to see is that units that are completely in green cover don't get suppressed (as it is supposed to be). Currently, it's simple the roll of a dice wether your squad gets suppressed or not. It's less a roll of the dice and more that cover bonuses are applied by the entity, but the 'in cover' symbol only indicates the squad. It is either when the squad leader is in cover, or the majority of the entities are in cover, that the symbol appears. Either way, there's often a high chance there are entities NOT in cover that are eating all the suppression for the whole squad. Cover is applied by entity and suppression applied to the squad. This is what causes that sense of 'dice rolling'. Infantry just are too stupid/blind in combat to move or position themselves out of open cover, or simply can't find their way to cover on their own. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: how the change of the tanks firing12 Feb 2016, 17:02 PM Moody Construction? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: New British Helms Deep commanders12 Feb 2016, 17:00 PM I do miss the Flak 88 incidentally... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: To Old school vCoH players: Why do you choose CoH2?12 Feb 2016, 01:09 AM I like capping circles, but I really dislike the cooldown on the point if I chase off my opponent while it's still neutral. Having to wait for it to reset before beginning my own capture can be annoying. I've always wished you could actively capture the actual territory point for the same kind of repair penalties to capture faster and/or reset an opponent's capture if they get pushed out the circle before capping a neutral point. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Hardcore - Semirealistic mode11 Feb 2016, 17:46 PM That's always been code for too much time/money. In: COH2 Balance