Profile of Sander93

Wouldn't it be better to display DPS rather than damage and accuracy? Those stats basically mean nothing without the rate of fire and cooldown/reload stats.

Rest of it looks good!

No, the real problem is that you lose the whole map at the push of a single button.

It doesn't matter what this skill plane does, the fact it covers a whole portion of the map and you lose all your control is what makes it broken.

The whole map? Do you actually have stats to back this claim up or are you just posting random stuff again?


Last time I checked the Sector Assault radius is about 1/4th of the smaller 1v1 maps. That leaves plenty of room to go somewhere else.

(I thought removing bombs was supposed to make it less powerful?)

Don't know why you'd think that, as the patch notes do not state that.

Sector Assault
This ability has received changes to make it perform more consistently and predictably, while removing its ability to obliterate entire armies in some instances.

Also it's 250 munitions (might need to be bumped to 300). If you want anyone to take you serious I'd advice to do some research before posting and to actually make some decent and well presented arguments instead of randomly swearing and rambling.

The real issue with blobbing is the underperformance of some anti blobbing assets.

The problem here is that whatever buffs you give to individual units/abilities to make them better versus blobs will also make them better versus individual squads. The old demo is a good example of something that was a great deterrent to blobs but ultimately also caused too much inbalance to individual squads.

On top of that not every faction has access to good anti-blob units, such as Ostheer's Brummbär. OKW for example has nothing except the generalist Panzer IV (Stuka sucks vs blobs) and arguably the Sturmtiger. Those that do have these units locked behind late-game tech (Katyusha, Brummbär) or doctrines (Pershing, AVRE).


As long as the game has no way to distinguish for units/abilities whether they are targeting single units or blobs, I think the only way to nerf blobs is by giving them a RA/RD penalty. Therefor I voted yes. I'd give something like -10% for every squad in close proximity of one another, with a minimum of 2. So 3 squads gives -10% (not gonna hurt too much if you're forced to briefly blob due to map or circumstances), 4 squads give -20%, 5 squads give -30%, etc.


Perhaps the incremental accuracy mechanic for HMGs can somehow be used in another way so they can deal more/faster suppression to bunched up units, but I have no idea if that's possible.


P.S. the HMG 34's suppression profile is only 10% worse than the HMG 42's. Which is still very high (~2,33s to suppress at 30 range). It's its DPS that is lackluster.

USF Recon Support got some changes in hindsight of the USF Tech Tree changes because Airborne had to be changed to stay viable (ATG drop down one CP, Pahtfinders down one CP) and Recon was left with practically the same abilities but still at a higher CP. It was recitified, rather than changed.

The new commanders patch might be able to buff some commanders in the same way the Commander Revamp Patch did, by using certain units or abilities in new commanders that are shared with other commanders and changing or buffing them across the board this way. Like what was done with Shocktroopers, KV-8, Stormtroopers, 250 HT, etc.

Feuersturm probably won't benefit by this though because there weren't really any good commander suggestions for OKW that shared some of the units or abilities.


We might be able to sneak in some changes in between but I'm just saying don't get your hopes up seeing this anytime soon, as right now the new commanders will be the primary focus.