They shoudnt have faust in the first place

Thread: Replace Falls' Faust with button?1 Nov 2019, 10:31 AM
They shoudnt have faust in the first place In: COH2 Balance |
Thread: Ostheer T4 Hot garbage or Actually fine?30 Oct 2019, 18:41 PM
I still think adding a side-tech in T4 to get a mechanic team like OKW would be nice. Could be the same price as OKW repair station too. In: COH2 Balance |
Thread: Ostheer T4 Hot garbage or Actually fine?30 Oct 2019, 12:50 PM
I believe the brumbar might need a little survivability buff, mAybe move the vet armour or hp to vet 0 ? Agreed. That's the only T4 Ost adjustment that makes sense. In: COH2 Balance |
Thread: Ostheer T4 Hot garbage or Actually fine?29 Oct 2019, 22:36 PM
I disagree with basically everything you wrote. Panzerwerfer isn't worse than other rocket arty. It's actually one of the best rocket artillery units in the game. Not sure why you would think it's worse than LM or Katyusha. Calliope is better but also more expensive. Stuka is debatable because they function in different ways. The 2x cheaper unit > 1 expensive unit argument is pathetic and doesn't say anything about how good the units are. Brummbär could do with a slight buff but 2 Ostwinds being better than one Brummbär has nothing to do with it. It's just like saying two P4s do more damage against infantry than a Tiger, therefore, the Tiger is bad. It makes no sense. Panther is an excellent tank and in the best spot it has been in since I started playing this game in 2016. So yeah. How this makes Ost T4 bad and useless (your words) is beyond me. In: COH2 Balance |
Thread: Ostheer T4 Hot garbage or Actually fine?29 Oct 2019, 22:17 PM
You earlier in this thread: "T4 is hideously bad. It's completely useless in 1v1, and I'd argue just as bad in 2v2." You literally said it's useless. Then a few minutes later all of a sudden "no one" said it? Holy shit man, get yourself checked. In: COH2 Balance |
Thread: Ostheer T4 Hot garbage or Actually fine?29 Oct 2019, 22:03 PM
Imagine being so spoiled and deluded by playing Ost only that you start thinking T4 is bad and Panzerwerfer, Panther and Brummbär are useless units. That's really all that can be said about this. And regarding the OP. Why should UKF pay extra for getting Comet or Churchill after having Cromwell and Firefly? At least when you do the extra tech with Ost you unlock three valuable late-game units instead of just one and some abilities that are often of not much use. Also: Ost T3 is cheaper than highest techs of other factions. OKW pays 135+60 for T4 + T3 and starts with less fuel. In: COH2 Balance |
Thread: How to counter Ostheer mg spam as Usf29 Oct 2019, 19:46 PM
WC51, Pathfinders, IR Pathfinders, Mortar, Smoke grenades, regular grenades, M20, Stuart, Pak Howitzer, Greyhound, Smoke Bombs from heavy Cav. Complaining about not being able to counter a MG as USF is very weird considering they are the faction with the most tools to counter them. In: COH2 Gameplay |
Thread: UKF nerfs when29 Oct 2019, 13:04 PM
My money is on the latter. Trolls usually have more questionable names. As for the rest----> Move to scrap yard please. In: COH2 Gameplay |
Thread: HMG Explosive Vulnerability28 Oct 2019, 21:55 PM
The nerfs to indirect fire did an excellent job of stopping mortars being an all-powerful bleed and wipe tool. Agreed. As others suggested improved aim-time, set-up time, tear-down time could help. Also the smoke barrage needs to be faster than it is now. I don't know why it is implemented to be such an unresponsive ability. In: COH2 Gameplay |
Thread: My personal issues with UKF28 Oct 2019, 20:35 PM
UKF has one big problem. Playing vs. Ostheer. The match-up with OKW is somewhat OK for both sides after the last major patch. In: COH2 Balance |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
33 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
13 |