Profile of LoopDloop

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 3053

General Information


Thread: Panthers need adjustment31 Aug 2017, 00:04 AM Jump back to quoted post30 Aug 2017, 23:31 PMShadowLinkX37 If people complain about the live jackson they should see fireflys. Yeah lol. Jacksons are a bit cheaper and faster though, and usf having good things seems to offend some people XD In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Panthers need adjustment30 Aug 2017, 22:58 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Aug 2017, 22:48 PMShadowLinkX37 The Jackson would be OP if buffed like in FBP because it would've had high mobility, range, pen, etc. The axis only have the JP4 and super heavies that go 60+. Yeah but people bitch about live version jackson sometimes. IMO it's just bad original design to say, "here, you have 1 thing that can fight axis tanks effectively" and have to make it do everything in loads of different scenarios (which is why you get the fbp Jackson that'll probably never be implemented anyway). In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF weapons should be on field upgrades30 Aug 2017, 22:55 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Aug 2017, 08:17 AMJae For Jett If it means anything, i always use 1919s. The long/max range dps of a squad of rifles with a single 1919 is essentially equal to that of a double bar rifle squad. On top of this, the main advantage in combat is that you dont lose dps as quickly since nearly all of the dps in a 1919 squad is on the last man, which means in a hypothetical fight to the death at max range, a rifle squad with a single 1919 would probably win against a double bar rifle squad. Some other notable advantages are that: 1919s dont even have a chance of dropping unless the squad gets wiped (since the weapon is on the last man) while double bars drop starting on the second to last man (in most situations this results in FAR more bars to be given over than the number of 1919s that would be given over). 1919s dont require weapon racks, so you save a fair amount of fuel and manpower. Well I think it means something because somebody who knows how to play will use 1919s. You bring up interesting points for sure. IMO (and I'm not trying to argue, just saying what I think of it), putting 1919s is weird because it gives up the negligible advantage of garands being semiauto (negligible because upgrade weapons do most of a squads dps anyway) and the role of riflemen being an aggressive flanker squad with its utilities and general stats. I also rarely put 1919s on paras (even though it's really really good) for pretty much the same reasons. I also always buy racks anyway because I don't like making at guns (or I go lt) and at my level it's usually not necessary anyway as zooks and maybe a AAHT or Stuart will do the same thing but for less mp. You also have a higher dps ceiling with double bars as the enemy closes (if they're inclined to do so, basically all of okw). In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Panthers need adjustment30 Aug 2017, 22:45 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Aug 2017, 18:14 PMDangerous-Cloth Ostheer Panther will never hit it on the move lol. Glide shots. It's not that hard. Jump back to quoted post30 Aug 2017, 21:52 PMDomine The fuck? How exactly did it have a better at capability? Panther had a better chance to pen against most targets and also had less chance to be penned by allied at. It also has a bit more range now (which is apparently super OP when Jackson has more range than tanks but ok when it's the panther). In: COH2 Balance
Thread: I thought they buffed the UKF snare?30 Aug 2017, 05:36 AM Jump back to quoted post3 Aug 2017, 15:30 PMAustindb95 Lol ukf and buff Funniest post I've seen all month. In: UKF Strategies
Thread: Could AoE4 be Modern?30 Aug 2017, 05:35 AM Jump back to quoted post23 Aug 2017, 02:07 AMBasilone The picture is Vietnam era if its to be trusted. Would not be surprised if game is WW1 -> Cold War, getting a pure WW2 AoE almost certainly not happening. That's what I thought too. In: Other Games
Thread: Cruzz's The More You Know30 Aug 2017, 05:29 AM Jump back to quoted post29 Aug 2017, 22:12 PMZansibar Oh boy then you havent seen cons, volks with STGs wipe them like flies. The problem is that volks have stgs but also have k98ks so they have good accuracy at long range and also good short range firepower and the fact that their stgs are straight superior in every way to their k98s. Recipe for wipes, especially on poor cons. Penals are ridiculous at wiping too tho, even on the move. Jump back to quoted post30 Aug 2017, 03:54 AMSpinflight Not just me then. Is it a universal thing or just a Relic fuck you reward for British vet finally working? Tommies seem to be utterly useless without double Brens too. Even the ever wonderful wander an OKW squad up to a Vickers, roll around on the floor a little bit then wipe the Vickers with a nade thing seems to be back. Read some patch notes which claimed that light vehicle play was being made more viable. As one of my UC's must have eaten around ten fausts ( I ended up taking the piss as I'm sure it cost him more than me ) and pretty much the same with everything bar heavies.. One wonders why they don't just issue UKF vehicles with permanent engine damage. Seems... Campier too. Another thing to consider is that I think (not 100% sure on this) tommies are squishier out of cover, more so than other inf. They also have .25 accuracy on the move lol. Double brens make tommies way better but they can still be decent with vickers support without brens (unless said vickers gets a bs flamenade to the face). It doesn't suppress fast enough to prevent veteran volks (especially with the -10% suppression bulletin) to not be able to crawl up to it sometimes, but with support retreats are usually forced on them anyway, and the vickers does a ton of damage for a t0 mg in exchange. Fausts have reallly long range. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Commando vet3 smoke on retreat.30 Aug 2017, 05:24 AM Jump back to quoted post28 Aug 2017, 08:14 AMullumulu if well played...they are a horror...drop bomb out of camo, can run and build demos while in camo (lol?) Oml read thread title. In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: Up-to-date unit guides for CoH1?30 Aug 2017, 05:22 AM Jump back to quoted post29 Aug 2017, 11:28 AMMr.Smith Thanks for all of your replies! Is there any situation where the following units are good for: - 30 cal - Sherman crocodile - Upgunning shermans - Hellcats (compared to M10 deep-dives); if I want to make Hellcats work, how do I work around them? I sometimes make .30s if I have a ton of field presence and the enemy is blobbing pgrens or volks (or has an early med bunker), but as nosliw said, your mp is often better spent and they're good when you get em free with airborne drops. I personally almost never use crocs or the hellcat, the former because normal shermans can fight tanks and inf and the latter because I hate giving up the penetration power. People do actually use the hellcat though, as it has more armor/health and cloak, and is still very useful for flanking heavier tanks. Upgunning shermans I'll do very rarely against pioneer cheese opponents where bar rifles can easily handle whatever small inf presence they have and I really need to worry about lategame vetted axis tanks, especially if I get a Pershing because it gets increased pen from the same upgrade (but severe ai) reductions. I think I read that the rounds fired by upgunned have very negligible difference in ai firepower, but they take like a second longer to reload, which is the kicker. In: COH Central
Thread: Sniper shooting at tanks30 Aug 2017, 05:07 AM Yep. Holdfire is the only solution. Kinda dumb lol. Sometimes ost snipers will shoot clown cars or dodges and get rekt. In: Ostheer Strategies