The intention was: OKW has NO good anti MG mechanic.
Had you said THAT the following pages of discussion would have been different. It's hard to tell what you mean when you don't say it. It's harder still to determine what you mean when you double down and demand testing on what you say. Try saying what you mean and clarifying what you mean before people spend pages proving what you say wrong and the forum will be much more productive for it.
Now that we have disposed of what you wrongly said we can move on to what you meant...
Flanking is the name of the game for okw.
As proven when disproving what you said before we got down to what you meant, the kuble, while cheap can punch above its weight and is not to be ignored. Some of the more foolish among us might feel that crew weapons are enough to repulse this car, but they would be wrong. Combined with the starting engineer that has StGs knowing that enemy resources will be limited and insufficient its possible to take out even supported mgs with fire superiority and mobility.
Once multiple mgs are around obviously it becomes a different goat and flanking is limited, but volks get all their goodies very quickly and combined with any other unit are formidable. Of course a strong defense position is going to be tough to crack, as with any faction but again you have the ability to move and harass elsewhere. Early game isn't about trying to smash through enemy strong points but exploiting the unit saturation of them. If you can't beat the enemy don't fight them. Be where they are not and strike when they are weak. Poking with a kuble that takes no manpower bleed is very viable for attrition, especially against the soviet who can't heal without another 250mp and a retreat to base.
Then of course once volks have their flame nade enemy mgs become obsolete because allied mgs can't keep multiple volks suppressed and will eat a flame nade assuming the okw player uses even the slightest but of micro....
EDIT seems you did first mention what I accused you of not. I went back for the quote I did but apparently not far enough. My apologies.