Profile of thedarkarmadillo

The incomplete dodging thing is same for every grenade. Even the top players can not doge HE grenade perfectly every time, they usually took reduced damage like 20% ~ 30%.

And then are able to continue using that same cover. No dice for a flame nade

The throw range is what, 20? If you're worried about cover just get to 10 range to make things equal.

Which wold be reasonable if volks didn't have STGs which shred units upclose and as they close. They can move into cover near you and flush you out of cover without skipping a beat. One should always be trying to use cover, being able to remove it in an instant is incredibly powerful. It used to be reserved for cons alone with a number of drawback including but not limited to being on conscripts.

It should be made into a molotov clone. A fast throwing and long range cover denial grenade has no right being in the game especially when you consider that it's closest counterpart the molotov has been shaped for years to NOT be a "win any engagement by negating cover" ability

In the majority of times when a unit is characterized Over Performing it is meant OP for cost.

I JLI had a price of 500 manpower they would UP for cost.

Well, 2 man sniper squad with sprint was 360mp so idk about that...

Its is like: lets make a contest and make the rules so one unit must win, because the rules are made for them.

test the same units without cover and come back.
test the same units at some other ranges and come back.

Using Cover is the most realistic scenario, being a core component of the entire combat system and all. Using no cover isn't. Because cover is a core component of the entire combat system. The fact that JLI, 1cp 280mp infantry can beat even Obers, who are the latest arriving and some of the most expensive in the entire game is an absolute testiment to their power, that's before even considering they get a 50%accuracy bonus out of camo and camo allows them to select which engagements they want to fight.

This test is SPECIFICALLY testing the best long range squad, using ONLY long range squads, why would they test at any range but each squads optimal range? It's best case scenario for all those units and most likley the targets they will be facing (because trying to close against a long range squad is a guaranteed lost match up, as they can deal damage to you while receiving next to none) or is there something about this match up that you feel is skewed towards a particular long range specialist that makes it far and above other long range specialists?

But for the sake of fairness I too recommend we try the tests at 0 range on neg cover as it is the only way to possibly replicate the real game scenario of how one would use a long range squad.

And after that, I would like to match up shocks, Thompson rangers and commandos at 40 range so we can determine who (if any) is the king of CQB!