Go look at page 1 again and tell me that is the performance of a hard-counter unit.
If that doesn't convince you that you're mistaken, go somewhere else. This isn't a panther and it's not a TD, and neither is it anywhere close to the capability of either in the AT department.
If it was, maybe that would excuse the terrible AI, sure.
Hell, if you increased the price and mirrored panther Stats maybe this thing might actually have a place.
1 time test < actual math , u Simply got unlucky , p4 has around 50% chance to pen Vs 70% of the e8
Like any other USF tank.
Also, tanks move faster then retreating inf, quick stop tap to shoot isn't hard to pull off if there is nothing protecting that retreat.
easy 8 has futher lower scatter, to represent the new horizontal suspension
It has its advantage in form of field presence. Brumbar outranging Atgun proved to be OP because the only counter left are Tank Destroyers. Tanks Destroyers that the same vocal group of Axis fanboy complains about their supposed over powerness and want to nerf as well. ATgun are still one of the counter to Brumbar so it is normal that the brumbar doesn't have an ability to counter them from safe distance.
---
Imo T4 suffer more from heavy tank meta still in use in 90% of games than being weak. Ostheer T4 is still the way to go vs Allied premium medium tanks and heavy elite infantry play. Ostwind going on par with the Brumbar is a problem of Ostwind being too good, not the brumbar being bad, Brumbar 2 or 3 shots any squads and that the maximum it can do as per balance standard.
are we gonna nerf both ostwind and centaur ? cause they have same ai