Profile of Vipper

While we are comparing the zis and rak outright can we include tech costs and buying costs? I'm no pro but in theory, a more expensive unit from a later tech doing the same job SHOULD be better at it no? So say you knock off 90mp off the zis, and another 160mp in tech costs I reckon somewhere along the line it be be required to be less effective no? See as there would literally be an entire squads worth of manpower difference in this TOTALLY theoretical scenario where the AT gun was 90mp cheaper and 160mp cheaper to unlock...

I don't think that people claimed that RW should be as good as Zis while being cheaper.

I personally was responding to a claim that RW is as good or even better than Zis. It is not, it an unreliable weapon that can be killed by one shot.

I not going to dispute your numbers. However, from my in game experience i can't help but feel volks proformance, especially in the early game, is pretty much on par with rifles.
...

Imo problem lies elsewhere.

Grenadier where (and should be) the benchmark and not VGs. Riflemen where OP compared to grenadiers because of faction design since they had to carry the faction.

The early appearance of powerful units like Penal, Assault engineer, JLI, Pathfinder, Cav Riflemen, SP, ST44 VG and so on has made Riflemen seem weaker by comparison.

One should either reduce the power level available early or give powerful early units to all factions and that should include earlier access to PGs and Obers.

is it possible to have the Panzergrau skin for Ostheer winter vehicles?

Imo the gray/white contrast is much better.

yeah that's true, but if you calculate maximum value, it still faster than ZiS almost 16%.

so focus on my point, Raketenwerfer wasn't bad to requires any buff.

And if you make calculation you should be using the correct values and not the ones that are better for your argument.

Bottom line here is that zis is a far more consistent ATG that RW and I would swap it for RW when I play OKW in most cases.

The problem of incendiary rounds is that it is only helpful if one goes T1.

An improvement would be if other unit like Puma would also get them.

Else they can simply be replaced by the 250 MHT.

The hezter again forces T3 so the commander forces OKW to go T1 T3 to see the benefits of the commander.

A simply solution would be for hezter to be buildable from HQ and not T3 with either Tech or CP restrictions.

In addition the units rear armor need to go up since it has not turret or AT capabilities.

In addition imo all flamer vehicles should have their DOT removed and their DPS balanced accordingly. The DOT should come from a timed ability.

As for turning the Opel to ambulance I am against argument that since faction A has something faction B should also have access to it.

The Mp40 upgrade also need to be loot at since the units is to weak compared to other CQC units
(probably because other units are OP thou) while it is a unit that shares cooldown for grenades where other units do not (again probably all units should).

As revamp goes one has to decided the power level for commander fro each faction and then start nerfing commanders that are above that power-level. That approach would probably have the more impact in increasing that viability of commander and build orders.

The unit is rather weak but it can simply become cheaper or get more utility.