Profile of Vipper

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: British base smoke barrage26 May 2019, 11:25 AM Jump back to quoted post26 May 2019, 11:12 AMSuperHansFan It's not offset if you have a mandatory sweeper Offset would be able to put it away like sturms, but no matter what you will have less combat power than regular RE. Basic maths, 5 stens better than 4 minesweeper comes "free" without having to pay 30 munition. The unit is slightly more expensive but it trade utility over firepower compared to R.E. so I am not sure what you are complaining about. And not there is very little reason that they should be able to put away the sweeper, they unit is already dirty cheap and one of the most cost efficient engineer unit in the game. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: British base smoke barrage25 May 2019, 17:14 PM Jump back to quoted post25 May 2019, 16:35 PMSuperHansFan I would prefer smoke with sappers with grenade tech Similar to how USF get it "play the commander that gives sappers with smoke grenades" My apologies, I simply couldn't resist the temptations. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Soviet - Airbourne feedback24 May 2019, 23:08 PM Jump back to quoted post24 May 2019, 19:26 PMLago All team weapons reinforce for the cost of the crew models. If you raised the reinforcement cost on the DshK it'd be lost the moment one got recrewed. It does not work exactly like that but yea. We are talking simply about the cost for reinforcing the Hmgs with their original crew. In: Lobby
Thread: Soviet - Airbourne feedback24 May 2019, 18:34 PM Jump back to quoted post24 May 2019, 17:51 PMMr. Someguy Weapon team's price is determined not only by the cost of the crew, but the cost of the gun. Reinforcement cost only takes into account the cost of the crew, though. The DShK team reinforces the same as the Maxim because the DShK is more expensive but the crew is identical. I know but more Dhsk is one of the most expensive Hmgs and the reinforcement price is one of the cheapest. The price of the weapon itself is currently arbitrary. Either all hmg need to reinforce with the same price or they should all reinforce according to the price of the team weapon In: Lobby
Thread: Soviet - Airbourne feedback24 May 2019, 16:54 PM Jump back to quoted post24 May 2019, 16:37 PMmurky depths For Lend Lease, I assume? Airborne one is a drop in and is based on who you recrew with, I'm guessing. There 2 doctrines that can call-in Dhsk. Reinforcement cost for re crewed weapons is all over the place and depends on the who owned the weapon originally. In: Lobby
Thread: Soviet - Airbourne feedback24 May 2019, 16:31 PM Dhsk as call in unit costs 300 yet it reinforces at the same cost as maxim at 20. Reinforcement cost should be increased accordingly to price. In: Lobby
Thread: Pershing Underpowered?24 May 2019, 11:52 AM Jump back to quoted post24 May 2019, 11:44 AMMittens Best Medium in game. Its health and armor are lacking but man does that gun gobble up infantry and rewards good micro. IMO its fits the USF AESTHETIC the best as its basically a glass cannon that is overly punishing if you lose it. It armor is not lacking. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Small change to brittish hammer tactics22 May 2019, 14:02 PM Jump back to quoted post22 May 2019, 12:44 PMSeductiveCardbordBox If the solution to the mortar pit problem is a four man squad of royal engineers with awful damage that build their own pit and can bail out of it, fine. So long as the sodding thing can vet up, pack up, and move Static is the part that makes then awful. No the suggestion is a separate crew unit that they are only able to use the emplacement. The emplacement it self will not be able to be pack up but will serve as garrison. Creeping emplacements is really problematic strategy that should not become available. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Small change to brittish hammer tactics22 May 2019, 11:55 AM Emplacements simply need an overhaul. That could include: 1) Being redesigned and anvil providing bonuses that could include price reduction pop reduction durability and other bonus. 2)Emplacement being built as garrison building and having to buy a crew. The crew could disembark the emplacement and survive. This changes aim in splitting the cost to emplacement and the crew so that the investment and performance can be better balanced. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: KV1 and Churchill can take too much damage21 May 2019, 15:26 PM Jump back to quoted post21 May 2019, 13:33 PMSeductiveCardbordBox If they are fighting in a total vaccum, sure. But that is a SLOW fight with their respective guns and armour. Meanwhile, the PzIV is much more mobile and comes with a better overall infantry punishing set of weapons. The KV1 is totally unable to chase and finish enemy vehicles unless they're crippled and snared, so while yes, the KV1 can slug it out with mediums, its not that much use otherwise. At least the churchill has side port sten guns and a grenade/smoke mix to let it support. The KV is just kind of a brick. A useful thing to have, but not individually all that powerful. You seem to agree me and disagree with WingZero who described the KV-1 as "complete joke and I never ever worry about this tank" and you should probably be quoting him and not me. In: COH2 Balance