To be honest, if that works that's quite ingenious lol.
I dont think it works until I see it. Ive seen roughly 50 or more destroyed sWs trucks already but never an abandoned one
Thread: Terrible new form if trolling/griefing 25 Feb 2020, 15:30 PM
To be honest, if that works that's quite ingenious lol. I dont think it works until I see it. Ive seen roughly 50 or more destroyed sWs trucks already but never an abandoned one In: COH2 Gameplay |
Thread: Regarding 1.2 and KT/IS225 Feb 2020, 13:16 PM
I did the same and are you 100% sure we tested the same unit? ![]() In: COH2 Gameplay |
Thread: Terrible new form if trolling/griefing 25 Feb 2020, 13:15 PM
replay or did not happen. In: COH2 Gameplay |
Thread: Regarding 1.2 and KT/IS225 Feb 2020, 12:34 PM
Explain please how Tiger is dead now in 1v1 In: COH2 Gameplay |
Thread: Regarding 1.2 and KT/IS225 Feb 2020, 11:59 AM
I do play 2v2. And Im not an expert about 1v1 but how can this unit be a big issue there? It seems to be a crazy idea to go for pershing nowadays when it gets bullied in the current Tiger meta. Or by a panther. Now with the small price and CP increase for pershing, both heavies should be affordable at roughly the same time In: COH2 Gameplay |
Thread: Its like Usf is just super powered24 Feb 2020, 23:08 PM
![]() In: COH2 Balance |
Thread: Regarding 1.2 and KT/IS224 Feb 2020, 22:55 PM
Pershing so OP that I saw the last one about 3 months ago ![]() In: COH2 Gameplay |
Thread: Raketens are too good24 Feb 2020, 20:23 PM
Sander already explained that removing suppression from Raketenwerfer was not a nerf. not a durability nerf but a combat nerf. The combat penalties from being suppressed are very high In: COH2 Balance |
Thread: Raketens are too good24 Feb 2020, 20:03 PM
you should be allowed to suppress raketens again In: COH2 Balance |
Thread: Regarding 1.2 and KT/IS224 Feb 2020, 19:49 PM
The thought process is: heavy tanks are OP as fuck because they constantly kill 2-3 models per shot while also having very good AT capabilities. That's why they need to be nerfed. I would still take a Tiger over a Pershing anyday because Tiger armor can actually bounce shots. It's the reason why Pershing is dogshit in teamgames nowadays. Majority of anti tank weapons penetrate the pershing extremely reliably so now you just end up repairing that thing with shitty rear echelons for way too long. And yes Pershing anti inf is better now as tradeoff, but Im sure in your tests you also noticed that the Tiger anti inf performance is still very good, it just seems no longer broken af. In: COH2 Gameplay |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
26 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
98 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
8 |