Profile of SkysTheLimit

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: Veto maps6 Mar 2019, 20:41 PM The current veto system is still a bit of a mystery to me, so I'm not so sure. When it comes to bias I find certain maps favor spawns more than particular factions. For example I think road to kharkov favors the South spawn. In: Lobby
Thread: Command panther adjustment6 Mar 2019, 06:09 AM Jump back to quoted post6 Mar 2019, 06:04 AMdistrofio OP was changed, now its about CP LoS... Gj reading You wanna talk about the command panther go ahead and quote me. If you want to keep being a jerk to everyone, dont bother In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Command panther adjustment6 Mar 2019, 06:01 AM Jump back to quoted post6 Mar 2019, 04:18 AMthedarkarmadillo Just to be clear, I think all the versions of Mark target should do the same thing at the same value, but I can see the reasoning behind the CP having a better version. Would be simpler, but I would argue there's a reason for the difference. Unless your fighting a Churchill as OKW, a vast majority of the allied tanks you're fighting will have lower or equivalent health pools, and lower armor unless its an IS2. They will also usually be smaller in target size to make up for these things, hence the accuracy buff and lower damage bonus on the german version. But that's all just theory on the reasoning If the t34/76 misses a shot (is that really an IF?) in one of these medium on medium fights with soviet mark target, then we're back to 4 shots. Meanwhile the CP version makes misses less likely. I think the only way they're not equal is in terms of usability, but I don't really know what you can do about that. You could give recon tracking like the soviet one has, but in their actual effect on tanks I dont think their as unequal as people say. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Command panther adjustment6 Mar 2019, 02:21 AM Jump back to quoted post6 Mar 2019, 00:38 AMthedarkarmadillo @SkysTheLimit by needing a unit a I mean if all you have as the Soviet is conscripts and AT nades you can still mark target. T70 spam? Yeep no units at all? Yessir. I'm not sure I understand what you're trying to say here? Edit: I believe I'm properly reading the sarcasm now lol The soviet one is better exclusively because it's more flexible. The command panther offers flexibility in other ways IMO. If it gets moved into tech I think options for improving it are much greater In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Command panther adjustment6 Mar 2019, 00:13 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Mar 2019, 20:57 PMdistrofio Sad thing you compare 2 different commanders that are mutually exclusive. People have been comparing them this entire thread, are you blind? I was responding to the comparison, not starting it. Jump back to quoted post5 Mar 2019, 20:57 PMdistrofio And no one says CP is UP, read agin please. The entire thread starts on a request for a cost decrease. It deserves a decrease, if it's moved behind tech. Jump back to quoted post5 Mar 2019, 20:57 PMdistrofio And one demands a unit to be present, wich demand muni in addition to the unit cost(manp, fuel and not getting a KT) and the other is a call in. Since when does soviet Mark target not require any units? You mean it does damage by itself? You mean I can mark units that I can't see? And yeah the CP version requires other resources. You're also getting a call-in unit that doesn't require any tech, last time I checked... I won't dispute that the Soviet one is better, but that's the whole point. Why is it a problem that it is? Jump back to quoted post5 Mar 2019, 20:57 PMdistrofio SU has greater impact (reducing 1 shot to kill on mediums) and OKM does not Is accuracy no longer a part of tank engagements? Are medium tanks the only units in the game that can damage other tanks? Soviet Mark target does squat if a shot misses, CP Mark makes misses less likely. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Command panther adjustment5 Mar 2019, 20:52 PM Wait so the command panther is UP now? When the hell did that happen? It's still a call-in unit and it should be locked behind tech (and made cheaper when it's moved as a trade-off) As for comparing it to the Soviet one, that doesn't make much sense to me. One is a Commander ability, the other is an ability for a unit. OKW also has heat shells on Elite Armor to improve their tanks damage if they want In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Can we adjust the Scott already?5 Mar 2019, 17:33 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Mar 2019, 08:07 AMthedarkarmadillo I don't think 45-50 range is an unreasonable start. I'm not a fan of nerfing it's range at all. 45 range means the Stug will be able to spank it around. That makes autofire so risky that you might as well remove it. Just nerf the potency of auto-fire. Longer reload/aim time, shell travel speed, kill radius, etc. One of those or a mix is all better to me than bringing it closer to the frontline. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Can we adjust the Scott already?4 Mar 2019, 23:56 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Mar 2019, 23:26 PMGrim Although I do play mostly team games so perhaps this is a 1v1 issue? Yeah scotts are much stronger in 1v1. I play mostly 2v2s and they're still pretty good, but in team games they are way easier to hunt down. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Can we adjust the Scott already?4 Mar 2019, 21:39 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Mar 2019, 11:29 AMVipper Its rather difficult to tell. USF where designed to be a offensive faction but with the new changes to their tech tree they can be as nearly as defective as Ostheer while their pack howitzer, Scott, Major Arty/Reckon, MHT and Priest give them the edge over Ostheer in static play. IMO it's US t4 that's the biggest problem. Jackson and Scott are uniquely strong at their specific roles to make up for the fact that US has fewer late-game options. Then the m4a3 is generally good against everything. A bigger redesign is probably necessary, but I think we are too far along for that. I think for now just weakening the auto fire would be a nice place to start. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Can we adjust the Scott already?4 Mar 2019, 11:24 AM Jump back to quoted post4 Mar 2019, 08:11 AMVipper PLS do not make this personal. Just read the first page and you can easily see who brought rocker launcher and MHT into this debate. I did not say it need a nerf in its durability, I said that combination of damage output and durability is simply too high. The unit needs to be nerfed and I have made no suggestions on how so far. My bad i didn't read far back enough. How do you think it should be adjusted? I assumed you were bringing up durability cause that was it In: COH2 Balance