Except you shoudnt compare auto-fire, mobile and not counterable with your own inderect fire unit, to a glass cannon, fire on CD and most importanly dodgeable unit.
Too bad USF doesn't have stock rocket arty. |
You probably never saw how USF abused it in team games. Wiping every living shit out of inf in seconds, without any counter play and ability to kill it (because its being protected by teammates). At least brummbar has to be in range of AT weaponary in order to attack.
You mean like for more or less the same cost of two rocket arty? |
Fascinating. Are you saying you lack the effort to write a single sentence to AE, which would not take more than 30 seconds?
More interestingly is the besmirching on A_Es character, looking at the document at hand. Taking screenshots for ants, to make it really hard to read what he actually wrote (Intentional? If not pls fix )
http://prntscr.com/10p9j17 Also, this is just a blatant attempt to discredit him, the guy literally offered you an interview, asked you if it was OKAY to upload it. Posted the link to your stream (Of which you ironically were also very 'emotionally unstable') And also trying to make him out to be some sort of psychopath who would try to change the document mid-way through to make it more dramatic. Of which the probable reason he actually did that was because of the youtube comments thinking it meant tightrope,luvnest amongst others which made it look like they were accussed of cheating. So it was probably clearing that up.
Also using private messages to try and paint him out as someone really awful? Jeez, but this actually makes me think. Is it not hypocritical to fling shit at AE for not fully releasing the top player thoughts in full without permission, but then immediately not only grab private DMs he had talked in but also along sturmpanthers and gaddafis convos as well?
Did you ask Gaddafi for permission? Sturmpanther? Did you approach them and ask if it was okay?
The most likely answer is no.
That last part also goes to you kimbo, very hypocritical to leak private conversations without asking the person involved :/
If you can't fight the logic, attack the person. |
Just a thought about design:
Changing the drop to an MG would eliminate all need to back tech into Lieutenant and force a Captain+upgrade tech path. Same goes for ATG drop, just the other way around.
Dropping a pack Howie favors a Lieutenant tech, but also allows for double officer tech. It also keeps the need for a later back tech into the respective second officer squad regardless of the first choice.
There is nothing wrong with a single commander forcing a build strategy, but from a design choice it limits the decision making. Just a random thought I had.
I know but I after having given it many tries since the patch I don't think the pakh is anymore THE unit you want to build anytime.
The patch aimed to reduce the effectiveness of the pakh when paired so obviously its a direct nerf to the doctrine since it is basically what was making the doctrine strong.
It's not like I want the HMG at all cost but that HMG have more value than pakhowi at the moment, even more when you think you'll drop two of them. Another possibility could be to simply remove the drop altogether and stick to para that can upgrade Zook or Thompson with a price cut accordingly. |
I think part of the problem with Raid tactics is that it's a munitions dump in a munitions heavy commander combined with the fact that it's light vehicles only - so realistically you mostly use it during the early game when you most need to bank munitions. If you want to use Para Combat Group (200 munitions if you want upgrades right away) and then it's hard to use with Greyhound because Greyhound also requires munitions. It would be more useful if it applied to mediums (slower cap speed to balance) so that it has some late game use and doesn't become useless as soon as your Stuart dies. Another unique idea might be to make it a passive that gives some/all vehicles Soviet "Secure Mode".
Raid tactic still has its use on late game with the greyhound. So obviously I'm not talking about 3v3 or 4v4 here but on 1v1 and 2v2 a greyhound is a really good unit to keep your flank and harass opponent points using raid tactic.
But I still think a jeep would do better than raid tactic because that's an early game unit.
Imo the pakhowi should go now that it has been nerfed, I stand on my proposal to replace it with an HMG and articulate the commander into Captain tier selection.
|
Greyhound has been swiftly nerfed when Noggano used it during a king of the hill tournament. Took them less than a week to nerf because a top player was using it efficiently and nobody could have figured out a proper counter. |
Make it a limit to one per player and modify its behaviour, can't be decrew but can't fire if put at 30% of life.
do the same with the mobile ones, sexton and priest. Limit one per player.
Additionally, make an exclusive area around the schwerer, can't build a lefh in the schwerer cover area or can't build the schwerer if a lefh is in the area
Then reduce the number of shell per barrage and reduce the barrage CD so arty are more responsive.
|
Devm vs Vonasten
barely 24h ago in the finals of 'Master League Affiliate Event: Olvadi's Tactical Resurgence' by Devm.
Unless you think Devm was trolling, it actually might be a good commander.
Airborne drop is insane value, lets you get a paratrooper (and a pak howi for 80muni)... tell me thats a bad deal and i will ask for you playercard
Greyhound is a decent light vehicle, yes stuart is better no doubt but they also have different roles. Stuart is a light vehicle counter with decent ai while the greyhound is an ai vehicle with terrible at BUT is a call in and doesnt need tech which means you can get it as a replacement LV or as an additional vehicle for a mid game push.
Also double officer with Greyhound as light vehicle isnt bad either
Raid tactics is a very fast capping ability - only for light vehicles sure - but tell me another ability that allows your 4min m20 to just ignore all the volks and drive at the cutoff and decapp it? Just casue its situational doesnt mean its bad, you just have to get value out of it.
You should have played vs J4J and his raid tactic m20+Greyhound spam, you would love/hate this ability.
Build a M8 and lose it 1 minute later, he only had good use of the cluster bomb drop. Didn't use para or raid tactic. So what's your claim? Devm could have use any of the USF commander and won the game equally seince he won by outplaying his opponent , and probably had an even better game if he had picked Calliope/pershing/Sherman76 instead of recon
So yes globally even if it has been picked once during the tournament the commander is ay best mew. Wouldn't have been Devm playing the game would have probably be a different game. |
Raketen is so bad that we constantly see Axis players asking to buff it. |
The problem is the combination of 5 men squad and retreat which make the unit too durable vs its intended counter = infantry. |