Profile of Esxile

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1

General Information
Steam: 76561197961387624


Thread: how to fix the american population exploit?9 Apr 2019, 09:44 AM Jump back to quoted post9 Apr 2019, 03:54 AMDyingbattery22 so they can have up to something like 50-60 population over the limit. i know this isn't a easy problem to I really need to see that replay. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW - Grand Offensive - Feedback5 Apr 2019, 21:08 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Apr 2019, 20:35 PMLago I don't agree. 640 MP 230 MP for a Tiger vs the Panther and OKW P4 is a meaningful decision. Command Panther is already hitting the field 90% of the time on 1vs1 and 2vs2, there is not going to have meaningful decision about it, you have a unit that counter infantry and be a persistent threat to any tank with the support of 1 or 2 camo raketen and hit the field a bit later than a OKW Pz4 would do. I mean that's not rocket science, that's what is already the way to go for OKW with any of their tank but here you make it with one of the best all around tank and far far earlier than the King Tiger which is probably already the best of this category. Command Panther is somewhat balanced by the poor AI capacity it has, at least you can move your infantry around, a Tiger doesn't give you this luxury. Tiger for OKW is a bad idea because OKW actual design doesn't allow such unit without making an unbalance situation. Allied factions will be even more locked into rushing Tank Destroyers or IS-2 for the Soviet. In: Lobby
Thread: OKW - Grand Offensive - Feedback5 Apr 2019, 18:44 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Apr 2019, 18:40 PMLago I've got a thread up on making Battlegroup attractive: the Jagdpanzer one. As for Grand Offensive, I think locking it behind the SPHQ is enough. A Tiger can be worth it relative to a Panther or a Panzer IV on raw cost. It's definitely not worth teching another truck for. A tiger is just too good with only 2 trucks on OKW hands, that the point. Not that I'm saying it is fine with 3 trucks but there is a serious balance issue with giving a Tiger to OKW. It doesn't fit in the faction tech design. In: Lobby
Thread: Which Tiger should OKW have？4 Apr 2019, 07:00 AM Jump back to quoted post3 Apr 2019, 15:28 PMPrinceps Sure ... the all mighty Tiger. U know why no one goes for the OST Tiger ... because its crap. (and the 60TD Meta) And Ost had(back than) a very potend strat for T3 into Tiger. Then guess why the balance team put it behing 3 tech structures. They put themselves in a dead end situation where to please the people they gave to this doctrine the Tiger before considering the whole balance situation. Ostheer is not OKW, Ostheer start slowly and defensively, Ostheer doesn't have potent Lvs roaming the battlefield, Ostheer can't have Puma and Tiger together, Ostheer doesn't have T3 structure that can lock 1/3 of the map etc... Ostheer faction has been and is still balanced around the fact they get Tiger in various of their doctrines. Last, if the Tiger is so bad as you describe it, why people want it so badly for the OKW new doctrine? In: Lobby
Thread: Which Tiger should OKW have？3 Apr 2019, 13:45 PM OKW was never mean to get a super strong generalist tank aside from the KT. Tiger1 is a problem because with only 2 truck requirement it comes definitively too early and be almost incouterable while dealing massive damage to infantry the moment it hit the field if the opponent didn't decide to preventivaly build a TD. Have fun countering Tiger with a squad of Obers + usual 4volks gang squads with only infantry and Atgun if you happen to be behind in fuel. Oh and let's not forget the dual raketen hidden in the shadow just behind, Tiger soak damage and raketen just eat allied medium trying to stop it. Tiger behind 3 tech structure is not better since it make it comes too late. In: Lobby
Thread: Pay-2-win game?3 Apr 2019, 09:40 AM Jump back to quoted post3 Apr 2019, 08:50 AMtangoporo I play all of the modes 1v1 makes my head ache, 2v2 gives my heart burns whenever my troops get airstriked, 3v3 always have that one guy that goes afk after 5 mins and 4v4 is a circus. I need serious help You'll find that help on twitch, youtube and replays. You can start by watching those solid videos made by Tightrope: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLMJFmZl8aYOeoRdddMg7im6dwJHI4y7bL and follow watching some of his recent cast, he is always really good a analyzing each situation. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Pay-2-win game?3 Apr 2019, 08:40 AM What mod do you play? 1vs1, 2vs2 or 4vs4? Coh2 Learning curve is hard with every faction, you don't play OKW USF or UKF but you would face the same issue with them. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: USF Urban Assault -Feedback29 Mar 2019, 07:47 AM I'm surprised Cover to Cover doesn't have a debuff after the sprint. The commander looks interesting now but I'm pretty sure Cover to Cover will be nerfed. In: Lobby
Thread: Poll for hotly debated units in new commanders.28 Mar 2019, 16:19 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Mar 2019, 14:08 PMddd Its as cheesy as soviet clowncar. 200mp unit becoming burden after winning you the early game is good trade. Cav rifles become anything but useless with vet. In the current meta both are cheesy vs OKW, if it doesn't win you the early game, if you fail to vet your cav they become a burden and you probably already lose the game if your opponent doesn't commit himself fatal errors that let you come back. Ez8s will always be countered by panthers but that doesn't mean it's a bad unit even when a panther is on the field. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Revamp Volksgrenadiers terms of versatility OKW28 Mar 2019, 12:40 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Mar 2019, 10:08 AMBalanced_Gamer ... Then you include balance concept in your thoughts and understand why is the Kubel where it is. In: COH2 Balance