ye my mistake..had to check for myself
I've seen that edit!
Took me much longer to find the change, didn't expected it to be so ancient.
OKW vet5 units should give 2x the exp.
does damaging tanks give too much vet?
									19 Jul 2016, 12:07 PM
				
	#21					
								
					
				
		
Posts: 366
									19 Jul 2016, 13:48 PM
				
	#22					
								
					
				
		
 1
1			Posts: 1021 | Subs: 1
Generally, yes, I would agree with you. However, ever since the last patch they got the god-nade, which really helps with power-vetting.
imo the stronger the opponents get, the lesser of an impact grenades have. but yes, the nades are definetely stronger now!
Attacking a veteran unit will now reward 1.2x its base experience value per level of veterancy. In other words, attacking a level 3 veteran unit will award 1.6x more experience to better reflect their in-game value.
OKW vet5 units should give 2x the exp.
saying you get 1.2 base experience per level of veterancy means its multiplicative, but in the next sentence and in katiofs post it seems to be additive! that does not make that much of a difference against vet 3 units (10%), but if it works with vet 5, this is the difference between 200% and 250% !!
									19 Jul 2016, 13:50 PM
				
	#23					
								
					
				
		
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
imo the stronger the opponents get, the lesser of an impact grenades have. but yes, the nades are definetely stronger now!
saying you get 1.2 base experience per level of veterancy means its multiplicative, but in the next sentence and in katiofs post it seems to be additive! that does not make that much of a difference against vet 3 units (10%), but if it works with vet 5, this is the difference between 200% and 250% !!
Attacking a veteran unit will now reward 1.2x its base experience value per level of veterancy. In other words, attacking a level 3 veteran unit will award 1.6x more experience to better reflect their in-game value.
Here you have direct patch notes quote.
									19 Jul 2016, 13:54 PM
				
	#24					
								
					
				
		
 1
1			Posts: 1021 | Subs: 1
thnx!
lol, so someone at relic fucked up the math, because the first sentence says c_(vet)=1.2^(vet)
while the second says c_(vet)=1+0.2*(vet)






			
		lol, so someone at relic fucked up the math, because the first sentence says c_(vet)=1.2^(vet)
while the second says c_(vet)=1+0.2*(vet)






									19 Jul 2016, 17:23 PM
				
	#25					
								
					
				
		
Posts: 4928
if you change the hp of tanks,you need to change the hp of light vehicles aswell, and then normal rifles do suddenly much more damage against them
T A R G E T
A
B
L
E
S
									19 Jul 2016, 17:53 PM
				
	#26					
								
					
				
		
 
    		            							
			    		Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
OP: the answer is yes. The real thing is, if it hasn't been changed in 3 years, i don't think there's a reason to take the work of modifying ALL tanks and infantry with target tables and so on in order to try to "fix" this. 
			
		
									19 Jul 2016, 18:56 PM
				
	#27					
								
					
				
		
 1
1			Posts: 1021 | Subs: 1
OP: the answer is yes. The real thing is, if it hasn't been changed in 3 years, i don't think there's a reason to take the work of modifying ALL tanks and infantry with target tables and so on in order to try to "fix" this.
well, to be honest most balance discussion "results" here will never be featured ingame, because relic is too lazy or not interested anymore. things like commanders, side armor, squad spacing, etc come to my mind
for me its just interesting to see whether other players have the same feeling

									19 Jul 2016, 20:57 PM
				
	#28					
								
					
				
		
 
    		            							
			    		Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
well, to be honest most balance discussion "results" here will never be featured ingame, because relic is too lazy or not interested anymore. things like commanders, side armor, squad spacing, etc come to my mind
for me its just interesting to see whether other players have the same feeling
Side armor: laughs
Squad pacing: people had already done it
Commanders: unless we talk about implementing new things (which require modeling, animations, etc.), several commanders had seen tweaks.
If something can be served in a silver plate to Relic, it's possible that it could be implemented later on.
									19 Jul 2016, 21:49 PM
				
	#29					
								
					
				
		
 1
1			Posts: 1021 | Subs: 1
Commanders: unless we talk about implementing new things
im talking about a complete remodelling, cutting the numbers of duplicate abilities, getting rid of some commanders, maybe even introducing commander paths like in vcoh

	1 user is browsing this thread: 
	1 guest	
	
		
	
Livestreams
|   |   |   | 52 | ||
|   |   |   | 9 | ||
|   |   |   | 1 | ||
|   |   |   | 4 | ||
|   |   |   | 2 | ||
|   |   |   | 1 | ||
|   |   |   | 1 | 
Ladders Top 10
- 
							#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.46467.874+6
- 2.794136.854-1
- 3.14465.689-1
- 4.21154.796+4
- 5.400212.654+2
- 6.353186.655+2
- 7.501325.607+4
- 8.298128.700-1
- 9.327117.736+4
- 10.857232.787+4
Replay highlight
VS
					- 
									 cblanco ★ cblanco ★
- 
									 보드카 중대 보드카 중대
- 
									 VonManteuffel VonManteuffel
- 
									 Heartless Jäger Heartless Jäger
 
											
						Einhoven Country
						
							
								
									 
								
								 
								
								
				 
								
								Honor it
								15
							
						
						
												
							
								
									 
								
								Download
								2705
							
						
												
					Board Info
						598 users are online:
									598 guests
					
		
			2 posts in the last 24h
2 posts in the last week
24 posts in the last month
		
		2 posts in the last week
24 posts in the last month
			
			
				Registered members: 61870
Welcome our newest member, My Care Labs
Most online: 4501 users on 26 Oct 2025, 01:00 AM
	Welcome our newest member, My Care Labs
Most online: 4501 users on 26 Oct 2025, 01:00 AM
 
	
 
			 
			 
 
 
 

 
										 
									 
  
  
 
 
						 
						 
						 
						 
						 
						 Relic Entertainment
						 Relic Entertainment