Since some people would prefer new factions' nerfs than Ostheer buffs, I'd like to hear suggestions on how the WFA and Brit powercreep would be fixed.
For me I'd like to see Riflemen vet get rebalanced from -45% received accuracy to something like -30% received accuracy and -20% reincforce cost instead.
As for Brits, since I don't really play them much, maybe rebalance cheap Sappers to something else?
And since OKW has been butchered enough already, I don't think it has anymore issues other than free flak and sturmpio repair speed.
How would you address new factions' powercreep?
14 Jul 2016, 00:09 AM
#1
Posts: 276
I am not responsible for anything I say.
14 Jul 2016, 01:17 AM
#2
Posts: 4928
No combination option?
all you filthy hotchkiss lovers need to l2p #TeamPanzerIII
> Kriegsbeute Doctrine|Partisan Rework|British Infantry Rework|Soviet Assault Squad <
14 Jul 2016, 01:42 AM
#3
Posts: 372
Recieved acc nerfs across the board
14 Jul 2016, 02:04 AM
#4
Posts: 196
The more i play this patch the more i hate it. OKW blobs are gone, but now USSR and USF blob harder then ever.
This game is not enjoyable for me anymore. losing my faith in lelic actually being capable of making this garbage playable.
This game is not enjoyable for me anymore. losing my faith in lelic actually being capable of making this garbage playable.
14 Jul 2016, 02:10 AM
#5
Posts: 959
Power creep is inherently a bad thing. vCoH2 (ost and sov) were pretty much perfect in terms of 'power level'; everything else should fall in line with those two factions.
Otherwise if/when they release the next axis faction, it's going to have to fill the roll of "anti infantry" and "anti emplacement", resulting in 300mm motorized mortars that 1-shot every single emplacement (through brace) while being supported by 6-man dual LMG gren squads; by which point Ost will be entirely pointless.
Otherwise if/when they release the next axis faction, it's going to have to fill the roll of "anti infantry" and "anti emplacement", resulting in 300mm motorized mortars that 1-shot every single emplacement (through brace) while being supported by 6-man dual LMG gren squads; by which point Ost will be entirely pointless.
Opinions reflect all team modes (not 1v1)
I often edit my posts several times after posting
I often edit my posts several times after posting
14 Jul 2016, 07:25 AM
#6
4 
Posts: 312
Needs a "Buff OKW" option
14 Jul 2016, 11:04 AM
#7
Posts: 4474
Recieved acc nerfs across the board+ 1 halve all vet recived accuracy apart obers and shook troops
katitof-2018
Katitof-2018
Katitof-2018
14 Jul 2016, 11:39 AM
#8
Posts: 1605 | Subs: 1
You don't fight power creep with buffs.
EDIT:
You need to cut one "lo" in first Pollolo thing.
EDIT:
You need to cut one "lo" in first Pollolo thing.
14 Jul 2016, 11:57 AM
#9
Posts: 17885 | Subs: 8
Recieved acc nerfs across the board
+ 1 halve all vet recived accuracy apart obers and shook troops
That'll make LMG blobs even more OP then they ever were, while making CQC squads completely irrelevant.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
14 Jul 2016, 11:59 AM
#10
Posts: 4474
but mg finally counter them and they need to use cover
That'll make LMG blobs even more OP then they ever were, while making CQC squads completely irrelevant.
katitof-2018
Katitof-2018
Katitof-2018
14 Jul 2016, 12:11 PM
#11
Posts: 17885 | Subs: 8
but mg finally counter them and they need to use cover
You mean HMG?
And who do you mean by them? Assault grens? Sturmpios? PPSH partisans? Commandos who do not have a single rec acc bonus? Oh these pesky OP CQC units.
Because LMGs are not supposed to melt everything on approach. Thats why they were nerfed over and over.
And HMG do not counter inf by dealing damage to it.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
14 Jul 2016, 12:37 PM
#12
Posts: 372
You mean HMG?
And who do you mean by them? Assault grens? Sturmpios? PPSH partisans? Commandos who do not have a single rec acc bonus? Oh these pesky OP CQC units.
Because LMGs are not supposed to melt everything on approach. Thats why they were nerfed over and over.
And HMG do not counter inf by dealing damage to it.
If only you could use some form of support weapons to ensure your cqc units could make it close enough to engage at optimal range...
14 Jul 2016, 13:01 PM
#13
Posts: 17885 | Subs: 8
If only you could use some form of support weapons to ensure your cqc units could make it close enough to engage at optimal range...
That is a brilliant idea!
From now on I will use OKW smoke abilities when closing on tommy LMG behind green cover or alternatively move in with HMG!
Sounds like a perfect plan to win the game!
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
14 Jul 2016, 13:03 PM
#14
Posts: 372
That is a brilliant idea!
From now on I will use OKW smoke abilities when closing on tommy LMG behind green cover or alternatively move in with HMG!
Sounds like a perfect plan to win the game!
What OKW cqc units are you planning on closing in with in the first place?
14 Jul 2016, 13:07 PM
#15
Posts: 17885 | Subs: 8
What OKW cqc units are you planning on closing in with in the first place?
Spios?
G43 Pfussies also beat LMG squads at close range.
However I will +1 for the smoke as its greatly underused.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
14 Jul 2016, 13:08 PM
#16
Posts: 474
What the heck is CQC? Conqueror gun carriage? Command & Conquer? What does it stand for???
14 Jul 2016, 13:10 PM
#17
Posts: 372
Spios?
G43 Pfussies also beat LMG squads at close range.
However I will +1 for the smoke as its greatly underused.
So out of the 3 options you decided to focus on one?
Shit design notwithstanding, OKW has 2 of the 3.
14 Jul 2016, 13:12 PM
#18
Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1
What the heck is CQC? Conqueror gun carriage? Command & Conquer? What does it stand for???
Close-Quarters Combat.
If you see someone say CQB, that's the same except the last word's Battle.
14 Jul 2016, 13:13 PM
#19
Posts: 474
Close-Quarters Combat.
If you see someone say CQB, that's the same except the last word's Battle.
Aaah that makes sense. Thanks.
14 Jul 2016, 13:15 PM
#20
Posts: 17885 | Subs: 8
So out of the 3 options you decided to focus on one?
Shit design notwithstanding, OKW has 2 of the 3.
Because I personally consider charging with HMG against LMG squad behind cover being a bad idea.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
4 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.968562.633+23
- 2.555227.710+11
- 3.29446.865-1
- 4.275110.714+13
- 5.259143.644+3
- 6.250150.625+11
- 7.22491.711+11
- 8.19265.747+5
- 9.671423.613+7
- 10.5611.836+3
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
7
Download
743
Board Info
615 users are online:
615 guests
8 posts in the last 24h
17 posts in the last week
137 posts in the last month
17 posts in the last week
137 posts in the last month
Registered members: 45026
Welcome our newest member, diegoebradley
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, diegoebradley
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM