Login

russian armor

5man grens OP?

PAGES (7)down
11 Jun 2020, 21:28 PM
#101
avatar of T.R. Stormjäger

Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3

Stormtroopers aren't designed to have a standoff with tactical assault. They're designed to catch squads moving somewhere and ambush them with tac assault, taking minimal damage themselves while maximizing their own.
11 Jun 2020, 22:38 PM
#102
avatar of DerKuhlmann

Posts: 466

Once rocket artillery starts to roll out, 5 man grens the only viable ostheer infantry.

That´s it.

You need 5 man grens, simply so they don´t die in a rocket artillery barrage.
11 Jun 2020, 22:45 PM
#103
avatar of distrofio

Posts: 2358

Once rocket artillery starts to roll out, 5 man grens the only viable ostheer infantry.

That´s it.

You need 5 man grens, simply so they don´t die in a rocket artillery barrage.

Or maybe its time to implement a "brace" skill for 4man grens ;p

Increasing AoE damage resistance at the expense of stayin put (negative RA)
11 Jun 2020, 22:53 PM
#104
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17884 | Subs: 8

This actually got me thinking, how much DPS is wasted on grens due to rec dmg instead of rec accuracy, leading to quite a few weapons, especially vetted+ability combinations going well over 100% accuracy against them.

Their rec dmg vet might be much more potent against certain small arms situations then regular rec acc as you clearly can't exactly hit more then 100% of shots.
11 Jun 2020, 23:38 PM
#105
avatar of thedarkarmadillo

Posts: 5279

I'd actually say that stormtroopers are well designed, it's other infiltration units that are less well designed. Infiltration units should be assault mainline replacements, they should be maximized by using them properly. It's one of the few mechanics that isn't just range ffs. Add more depth don't take more away.
12 Jun 2020, 00:27 AM
#106
avatar of Serrith

Posts: 783



Then ambush camouflage would do the same thing for pgrens, probably better with their better range.

As I said, Pioneers need a damage buff, thus lack of identity. Royal engineers have a better target size and have a non-doctrinal size increase.

Bundle grenades would, again Pgrens do the same job but better.



Ambush camo does NOT do the same thing for pgrens, because the camouflage characteristics are different.

If stormtroopers lack identity because of overlap pioneers, but pioneers lack identity because of lack of damage, then how can stormtroopers identity be taken by pioneers who have no identity due to lack of damage?

If your goal is displacement then they will have the same effectivity, except that bundled grenades do not deny buildings....
12 Jun 2020, 00:43 AM
#107
avatar of thedarkarmadillo

Posts: 5279

Do storm troopers have sprint? (it's been a while since I used that commander) If not could that be an avenue to look into?
12 Jun 2020, 01:00 AM
#108
avatar of Angrade (Ægion)
Senior Modmaker Badge

Posts: 766 | Subs: 2

Do storm troopers have sprint? (it's been a while since I used that commander) If not could that be an avenue to look into?


Only for Encirclement
12 Jun 2020, 01:06 AM
#109
avatar of Angrade (Ægion)
Senior Modmaker Badge

Posts: 766 | Subs: 2

jump backJump back to quoted post12 Jun 2020, 00:27 AMSerrith


Ambush camo does NOT do the same thing for pgrens, because the camouflage characteristics are different.

If stormtroopers lack identity because of overlap pioneers, but pioneers lack identity because of lack of damage, then how can stormtroopers identity be taken by pioneers who have no identity due to lack of damage?

If your goal is displacement then they will have the same effectivity, except that bundled grenades do not deny buildings....


If reference when you said in wait in camouflage yes it is the same.

I said pioneers need a buff. This would cause overlap.

Bundle grenades are great against buildings, what are you talking about?



12 Jun 2020, 01:11 AM
#110
avatar of Porygon

Posts: 2779

Once rocket artillery starts to roll out, 5 man grens the only viable ostheer infantry.

That´s it.

You need 5 man grens, simply so they don´t die in a rocket artillery barrage.


That's one of the most disgusting thing I don't like in COH2.
Back in vCOH Calliope isn't that common, nebels and walking stuka never being squad deleting machine. Only Brit 25 pounder creeping barrage being crazy OP. COH1 Wehrmarct having medic bunker zombie then losing vetted squad isn't that frustrating.

You played hard, micro hard, babysitting your troops and finally rewarded having them vet 3. Then got one click wiped by a goddamn rocket, literally disgusting. And rocket artillery happens in every single game, walking stuka, land mattress, katyusha, calliope, panzerwerfers. Bullshit.
12 Jun 2020, 03:36 AM
#111
avatar of Serrith

Posts: 783



If reference when you said in wait in camouflage yes it is the same.

I said pioneers need a buff. This would cause overlap.

Bundle grenades are great against buildings, what are you talking about?





Actually an ambush is going to be stronger, the greater the dps you can level on the enemy before they retreat. For this reason, the stormtroopers are better at it, which isnt to say pgrens are bad at doing it but you want to front load your dps during an ambush, not trade fire at medium range.

So what you are saying is that currently since pios are underperforming for cost, there is no overlap but if pios were more powerful there would be?
I have already strongly advocated for pios to be cheaper, which would make the more cost efficient. This will also prevent your supposed overlap.

Grenades are meh against buildings because the unit inside can pop out and back in. This is a very basic micro trick. It does not work against incendiary grenades or molotov because they deal damage over time.
12 Jun 2020, 03:53 AM
#112
avatar of Baba

Posts: 600

only thing helping partisans now is removing them from the game and forget they ever existed
12 Jun 2020, 04:17 AM
#113
avatar of IncendiaryRounds:)

Posts: 1527

Permanently Banned
I heard 5man grens receive an RA buff in addition to the extra man. I don't think they need a different RA. The 5man 60muni upgrade is already a mile and a half better than the normal 45muni G43 upgrade.
12 Jun 2020, 04:21 AM
#114
avatar of borobadger

Posts: 184

Would be interested to know the exact stats of the upgrade. They are really strong at present.
12 Jun 2020, 05:06 AM
#115
avatar of thedarkarmadillo

Posts: 5279



Only for Encirclement

Thoughts on making it a native ability?
12 Jun 2020, 07:45 AM
#116
avatar of Vipper

Posts: 13476 | Subs: 1


Thoughts on making it a native ability?

Ambush and sprint should not bundle in the first place.

And ST do not need sprint. With it they can even be used aggressively instead of stay in ambush sprinting to enemy and then turning on "tactical advance".

The whole ambush/sprint probably started from misconception. Relic probably experimented with knifes for commandos so they give them sprint so they can move at melee range. When it was abandoned the sprint stayed as a leftover and then someone decided instead of replacing with something else to make it "feature" and give them a speed bonus further reducing the reaction time of the opponent.

So no sprint and ambush should not even be combined in the first place.
12 Jun 2020, 13:01 PM
#117
avatar of Angrade (Ægion)
Senior Modmaker Badge

Posts: 766 | Subs: 2

Would be interested to know the exact stats of the upgrade. They are really strong at present.


+1 Man
UI Icon
-10% received accuracy
Free med kits. (requires vet 1)

It offers more mobile dps compared to the LMG upgrade plus a large amount of durability, so moving to cover to cover is much more effective than just to A move everywhere. They do not gain as much as long range damage, but the Increase durability really pans out. They are still inferior to double bar riflemen in 1 on 1 though.
12 Jun 2020, 13:22 PM
#118
avatar of Angrade (Ægion)
Senior Modmaker Badge

Posts: 766 | Subs: 2

jump backJump back to quoted post12 Jun 2020, 03:36 AMSerrith


Actually an ambush is going to be stronger, the greater the dps you can level on the enemy before they retreat. For this reason, the stormtroopers are better at it, which isnt to say pgrens are bad at doing it but you want to front load your dps during an ambush, not trade fire at medium range.

So what you are saying is that currently since pios are underperforming for cost, there is no overlap but if pios were more powerful there would be?
I have already strongly advocated for pios to be cheaper, which would make the more cost efficient. This will also prevent your supposed overlap.

Grenades are meh against buildings because the unit inside can pop out and back in. This is a very basic micro trick. It does not work against incendiary grenades or molotov because they deal damage over time.


Wiping a squad before they retreat is not a good thing. That is why many AoE systems are designed not kill everyone, just wound the rest. Bad positioning and clums usually cause the squad wipes.

Pioneers should not be unreasonably held back. This is just creating a problem to be "fixed" later. Pioneers need a damage buff as long as there is no T0 Grens.

Except incendiary grenades are building specific. One can hope out and hope back in and still avoid most-all damage because it still only effect models in its radius. Many two store building are tall enough where it second story units are not damage by the pool.
12 Jun 2020, 16:43 PM
#119
avatar of JibberJabberJobber

Posts: 1614 | Subs: 3



+1 Man
UI Icon
-10% received accuracy
Free med kits. (requires vet 1)

It offers more mobile dps compared to the LMG upgrade plus a large amount of durability, so moving to cover to cover is much more effective than just to A move everywhere. They do not gain as much as long range damage, but the Increase durability really pans out. They are still inferior to double bar riflemen in 1 on 1 though.


Correction:
- +1 Man
- +1 G43
- -10% received accuracy
- -15% cooldown
- Free med kits. (requires vet 1)

I think the bonusses are too strong for the time the upgrade is available, but once Allied mainlines are vetted and upgraded, 5 men Grenadiers aren't exceptionally strong anymore.

Many people think Grenadiers have difficulty competing without the 5 men upgrade, so I'd propose lowering the RA bonus of 5 men Grenadiers to -5% and adding -5% RA to vet 3 Grenadiers in general.

This results in the early impact of 5 men Grenadiers being slightly lowered, but them regaining their current performance at vet 3, while it would slightly buff LMG and G43 Grenadiers and make them a more attractive option.

To make my previous post a bit more clear.
13 Jun 2020, 03:36 AM
#120
avatar of Serrith

Posts: 783



Wiping a squad before they retreat is not a good thing. That is why many AoE systems are designed not kill everyone, just wound the rest. Bad positioning and clums usually cause the squad wipes.

Pioneers should not be unreasonably held back. This is just creating a problem to be "fixed" later. Pioneers need a damage buff as long as there is no T0 Grens.

Except incendiary grenades are building specific. One can hope out and hope back in and still avoid most-all damage because it still only effect models in its radius. Many two store building are tall enough where it second story units are not damage by the pool.



There seems to be a disagreement with how players can, should and skillfully can use abilities tactics and units in the game. Suffice to say I believe you may be looking at what the "average" player can and will do with units and not what a skilled player can.
PAGES (7)down
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

399 users are online: 2 members and 397 guests
aerafield, Crecer13
1 post in the last 24h
30 posts in the last week
141 posts in the last month
Registered members: 44962
Welcome our newest member, SeattleSeoExpert
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM