Looks like Deflection SFX and VFX are missing on the M-42. Added an Issue to our database Thanks
What about missing usefulness?  |
What do you mean ? Luchs killed your AEC ?
Well, luchs pens it every time and AEC got terrible moving accuracy, you can chase kubel for half the map and never hit it. |
I was trying to be ironic.
Btw, which emote stands for ironic?
I use one of these 
And so was mine  I was hinting at this thread. |
Its airsoft AT gun, it obviously doesn't have sound, you use this thing to play with friends, not to make sounds or god forbid-inflict damage on anything  |
Shitty click bait title that has nothing to do with the patch
^This.
Also, M1919 is worse then LMG42 while costing more.
Its also incomparable worse then LMG34 while costing more  |
Cool, except you're completely wrong again.
Only doctrinal armor was buffed meaningfully, stock armor is mostly unchanged, sherman got pen buff, because it didn't made much sense that tank which needed to switch ammo had its AT shells as "strong" as tanks that didn't needed to choose between AI or AT.
Moreover, Ost armor and AT capabilities got also buffed with the stug as well as OKW can field almost 50% more tanks then they used to, more shrecks then they could ever dream off and OKW P4 is not only stock now, it can reach KV-1 armor values with armor bulletins.
If you see exclusively USF armor, sure they were buffed.
If you take into account changes to the whole game, USF armor was never weaker then it is now. |
Give the JagdpanzerIV the same AOE profile as the ISU with HE.
#BradLogic
The very moment by deciding to build JP4 you will not be able to build P4 and panther anymore. |
But that goes against the (admittedly wonky and inconsistent) design goals of the Bolt-Actions being better at long range and Semi-Autos being better at mid range. Actually, I think the SVT is the only example of this dynamic working as intended, since Riflemen have no bolt-action counterpart within their own army, and G43's are a munitions upgrade.
That concept is as dead as it can be.
It died the moment WFA was released, just like the concept of needing engineer to build structures or having to pay for side upgrades to get them(I'm looking at you OKW).
There is absolutely nothing that would prevent SVTs profile being mirrored to garand. |
Let's be fair, does USF need buffs? Infantry maybe, cause, lol, Riflemen to weak? 
And I'm playing actively USF too though not on 1v1. Soviets I didn't touch for a while, I play them too in general, but dislike them.
Neither USF nor OKW need any buffs, that doesn't change the facts they both have units that underperform, though OKW have much less of them right now(I can literally think of one).
AEC had no AI at all, now it does, its still clumsy as garden with its turret rotation, which limits its manouverability possibilities to remain effective, but at least its not a waste of resources anymore. |
Not as if you did the same way when an Axis unit received a buff....
Please, tell me you're reffering to OKW "revamp" first days, where only a complete lunatics would say they were "fine" and so they did.
On topic:
We have to analyze hte performance of new AEC and take into account the fact that: you pay for upgrade (meaning also no bofors) and you also pay for the unit....
At least this part you're rational.
UKF side tech is exclusive, you can never have both, so the unit should perform well for the price you pay(which is side tech and tech lock for the other option). |