Profile of Katitof

Jump back to quoted post3 Apr 2021, 20:33 PMcomm_ash

Why would you drop 3 healing crates at the frontline, when you likely only need 1 to buff the squads up there.

Jump back to quoted post3 Apr 2021, 18:59 PMWittmann39

Don't worry mate, at least I am playing the game already
You have to show me a sentence that Sander writes "221 must be defeated by the Vickers UC", as you already mentioned. Otherwise, I have nothing to discuss with a troll.

Jump back to quoted post3 Apr 2021, 18:15 PMTiger Baron

Sure.

Remove the best known and most popular tank of WW2 from 4 commanders and gut Ostheer's core doctrine choice.

Why the hell not.

All for the sake of "muh diversity".

Jump back to quoted post3 Apr 2021, 16:57 PMChukiki

About the Soviet Industry commander:

Replace kv2 with Il2-precision Bombing Strike
replace kv8 with T34/85

It has nothing good vs infantry or artillery
1. Yes it has a KV8 but it is pretty useless late game when the enemy has massive Anti tank infantry panthers and paks.
Kv2? same issue. And it underperforms anyways.

2. It has nothing that can fight Howitzers. When the Germans spam Howitzers its GG. U cant get close, u have no artillery strikes and no own artillery.

Since this commander has quite a lot of weaknesses due to underperforming tanks and nothing to counter artillery for I wanna ask to give soviet industry artillery strike to take out the opponents artillery.
The commander has already nothing good vs infantry so give it at least the artillery strike to counter Howitzers.
I also sugguest replacing the underwhelming kv8 wiht the T34/85 since u appearantly refuse to buff him.
i discussed the kv8 wiht some of my friends and we all share the same opinion that it is not a great tank. And none of us ever bothers uses it because of it. THe T34/85 is better at killing infantry. Yes it is. It kills instantly, instead of slowly reducing the squads health. For 145 fuel and being an ONLY anti-infantry tank u expect the tank to perform better.

Jump back to quoted post3 Apr 2021, 16:48 PMPip

Cool, still irrelevant though.

This would be meaningful if the 221 were a t0 unit, but it isnt; it comes at tier 1, just like the British 6 pounder, Sniper, and AEC. The brit has access to similar AT options to OKW at the 221 timing, the fact the Rak comes at tier 0 has absolutely no bearing on the 221/3 vs the UC.

Combat is the primary role of the 221, and honestly even the 223. The 221 gains armour with the 223 upgrade, if it's "Primary role" was to just be a cache, why would its combat performance improve with the upgrade, and why are the first three levels of veterancy for the unit focused around making it more combat-capable?

Lockdown is what the 221/3 transitions into after the Light Vehicle phase ends, it isnt it's "primary purpose", as building a 221, immediately turning it into a 223, and then immediately locking down a sector is not an efficient use of the unit.

But the UC is?

I do hope you realise that just because you say something is true, this doesn't actually make it the case? The UC's intended targets are similarly infantry, It's an AI vehicle primarily, which is rather supported by the fact it can upgrade into a flamethrower. It has two AI upgrade paths.