Profile of Katitof

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/katitof


Thread: OKW infantry anti-tank is not sufficient24 Feb 2018, 23:01 PM Jump back to quoted post24 Feb 2018, 22:47 PMVipper A great theory from Katitof , but unless it written somewhere from Relic it did not happen. It is written in the patch notes. BALANCE UPDATES OKW After analyzing play data from the weekend we saw an increase in early tank usage for the Oberkommando West. We are releasing a targeted change to directly reduce that usage and to bring the OKW on par with the other four factions. Panzer IV Ausf. J Medium Tank * Fuel cost increased from 135 to 150 Panther PzKpfw V Medium Tank * Fuel cost increased from 175 to 200 Panther PzKpfw V Command Tank * Fuel cost increased from 200 to 225 Tiger B “Königstiger” * Fuel cost increased from 260 to 310 “Jagdtiger” Panzerjäger Tiger Ausf. B * Fuel cost increased from 245 to 280 For someone who exclusively sits in stat sheets and patch notes, I have expected you to know that. Reason different then I have stated, however a reason stated by relic directly nevertheless, unfortunately OKW revamp blog post is no longer there for the "lore reasons" on the changes. I know you trouble with game mechanics and stats, but pls don't ask me find for you you can simply check yourself be reading the patch notes. I might not learned by heart all of the stats, but at least I am aware of which units are supposed to be used against what and don't use scenarios that never happen under any circumstances as examples. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: British infantry sections24 Feb 2018, 22:51 PM Jump back to quoted post24 Feb 2018, 22:49 PMVipper No thanks you have to check stat for yourself. I could, but I want to teach you a lesson on not putting out silly comparisons between things that literally no one except comp stompers use. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: British infantry sections24 Feb 2018, 22:46 PM Jump back to quoted post24 Feb 2018, 22:39 PMVipper Ober's Lmg got doubled nerf. Now a little better than the commandos bren (around 19%) while costing more and limited to 1. Commandos bren isn't exactly the meta(or ever was), so please remind us that's the DPS difference against regular bren. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Comet24 Feb 2018, 22:44 PM Jump back to quoted post24 Feb 2018, 22:43 PMVipper The devil is in the details. lumping the current panther into the same group as Comet is a gross simplification at best, and a complete disregard for reality at worst. You do the very same thing comparing JP4 to allied TDs vs heavy armor, even though JP4 is not meant to fight it... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW infantry anti-tank is not sufficient24 Feb 2018, 22:40 PM Jump back to quoted post24 Feb 2018, 22:27 PMVipper The value of TD is on how it fight other TDs but how well it counter tanks. Its actually how well it counters the range of tanks its meant to be. JP is a decent units, but it is very expensive (in tech cost,cost and pop) for countering mediums and luck penetration vs heavily armored vehicles. I guess we will be going over this until OKW becomes 100% ost clone or the other way, so lets go over it yet again: OKW pays extra 25 fuel for all medium vehicles and up for the vet5 system as well as for its fuel starved theme. Vet5 might not give raw stats anymore, but you are still getting more utilities then equivalent units. As for the DPS of FF you also underestimate it: JP vs IS-2 time to kill vet 0 65.25 - 85.25 vet 3 50.74 - 66.27 FF vs KT vet 0 82.75 - 107.50 vet 3 37.75 - 56.50 Firefly (Tulip) vet 0 66.25 - 91.00 vet 3 31.50 - 44.00 (number might be a bit off since the patch) FF is british top tier, most expensive TD, they have no alternative to it nor they have anything above it in terms of fighting armor. JP4 is NOT OKW top tier unit for engaging armor nor it is even intended to engage heaviest allied armor. Panther is made for that. Again, allies have NOTHING above FF, Jackson and SU-85 to fight heavy axis armor, but axis does have panther. Relations between AT units are NOT copy pasted equivalents. If OKW will lose Panther all together or Panther becomes impotent against heavy armor, then you will be 100% correct and JP4 will deserve a buff to be on level of allied TD, but as long as Panther is designed to counter heavy tanks you are only purposefully invoking bias by presenting false facts. If you want to truly compare effectiveness of allied TDs vs JP4, you should compare it against MEDIUM armor, which is intended JP4 target, because(I can't stress this enough) PANTHER exists for the very reason of countering IS-2 and such. Elephant and JT and it does not need an extra x130% at vet making able to "score" hit reliably even vs kubel. Fully agree, lets give FF a more suitable vet instead, like +30% reload speed. hammer tracking How long does it last again? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: British infantry sections24 Feb 2018, 20:38 PM Jump back to quoted post24 Feb 2018, 20:05 PMFiresparks logically they would have limit the bren at the same time as the m1919. only elite infantry like the airborne or commandos should get double LMG. the Ober's lmg34 is basically a double lmg. Not really, because tommies: -Are not as durable without upgrade -are not as good at CQC as m1919 created squad powerful at all ranges -did not come with built in suppression(first m1919 did) -brens are ~20% weaker then m1919 -do not have vehicle snare -do not have potent nades Don't be another vipper, just because 2 units share single feature in common does not mean they should be mirrored with their limitations AND rifles can still double up on BARs. These two squads are not the same, therefore should not get the same treatment. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Rear armor of some vehicles needs to be reduced23 Feb 2018, 21:01 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Feb 2018, 17:57 PMTheGentlemenTroll Still can't believe people are complaining about KT nerfs. The thing was literally a nondoc I win unit for OKW. Essentially an old Tiger Ace without needing to lock a doctrine for it. I literally said it was OP and is OP no longer. In: Lobby
Thread: Rear armor of some vehicles needs to be reduced23 Feb 2018, 15:51 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Feb 2018, 15:22 PMVipper The performance of panther and Allied TDs is irrelevant to this thread. So is the existence of this whole thread. For instance Churchill has a better chance to penetrate Ostheer P4 frontally mid/close range than P4 has to penetrate the rear armor mid/close range. The only singular job of churchill is to tank shots from med armor. Its literal damage sponge. You're complaining that the never picked, non meta, very expensive late game tank with low main gun performance does the very job it was intended to do-tank the shots while scratching paint job on opponents armor. This singular case alone makes your thread completely irrelevant given WHY relic nerfed rear armor of comet and heavy call-ins in the first place. It was NOT a "new general rule". It was to give a weak point for extremely efficient units, which not a single one on your list here is. You have(again) cherry picked a balance exception and are trying to enforce it as a new general rule, directly nerfing units that barely anyone uses and which are NOT in any way problems for balance. If your goal is "same rules for everyone", then sorry, this stopped applying 6 months post release, with first general re-balance. Clarity stopped being balancing principle the very moment modders were allowed to make balance patches. Now each unit is considered individually and if you are able to provide a viable cases for ALL of the units you have listed as to why they should have lower rear armor, then do so, otherwise you're no different then any other fanboy trying to push his agenda. In: Lobby
Thread: Rear armor of some vehicles needs to be reduced23 Feb 2018, 13:53 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Feb 2018, 13:43 PMVipper Panther does not have a main gun of Tank but of TD and thus does not qualify as tank. Panther is the only tank destroyer in game that can constantly fight infantry with LMG gren squad Efficiency, therefore it can not qualify as infantry helpless TD. Contrary to even StuG, Panthers MGs are not for visual effects only. In: Lobby
Thread: Make all Loiter plane abilities a lined strafe 23 Feb 2018, 13:38 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Feb 2018, 13:28 PMvasa1719 If you write about balance here and criticizing others, make same here with you friends i dont see different, we all here are same users levels exept mod abuse and people who have more rights here. He pointed out a bit of hypocrisy. I giggled irl and agreed. I am not talking about p47 because I havent used it for ages and, contrary to 90% of People around here, I do not like to talk about stuff I cant even properly remember or have not used for years(have not played with paratroopers for 2 years I guess). In: COH2 Balance