Profile of Katitof

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/katitof


Thread: Spring Update - Balance thread18 Apr 2018, 17:33 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Apr 2018, 17:23 PMTheGentlemenTroll If you have ever managed to pick up a dp-28 or other mg on a con then u know how ridiculously strong they are with them. I think they could have kept the ppsh41s at 3 if they removed Oorah from those upgraded with it. DP-28 is pathetically weak compared to any other LMG. There is a reason why 2 of them cost 75 instead of 120 on guards. But cons should never get any long range upgrade, it would lead to gren/volk like blobbing. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Spring Update - Balance thread18 Apr 2018, 17:15 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Apr 2018, 17:05 PMAlphrum If panther armour is getting nerfed so that even mediums can pen it from the front, its price needs to drastically go down. Best possible spot my arse, its gotten even worse. Stug rate of fire was the only thing good going on it, so yh lets nerf that too cuz apparently it has good armour LOL SU76 needed its 60 range, as it has little armour and very low health. all it needed was to have its barrage behind vet with a munition cost to it. KV-1 got exact same 270 armor and it doesn't seem to struggle when taking shots from axis meds with superior penetration. Plus, Panther was made more durable against TDs, that's the thing axis crowd was crying for last Quartal. Stug rate of fire is THE overpowered thing about it and it'll be back to what it was at vet1, so don't cry, I'd expect further nerfs as this one might not be enough for such potent TD, given the fact it did not got pop increase as all other TDs with 160 dmg nor a hard pen nerf like SU76. Also, didn't SU-76 had 140 far pen back when it was utterly useless? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: I strongly oppose the Soviet sniper change18 Apr 2018, 16:44 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Apr 2018, 16:40 PMKommandant_Omi 3: a sniper is always a bigger risk to wermacht then soviets because of the 4 man squads (one model down -25% dps) That applies exclusively to first 3 minutes, after that LMGs start to pop and most of squads DPS in on a singular model. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: SOV Sniper design18 Apr 2018, 16:03 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Apr 2018, 11:40 AMullumulu ?? you should 2 penals, 2 snipers and min 1 guards in the first 5-6min....after than you have a basis army and need only a katj, 1-2 su85 and maybe one more pio. thats it for the most games. Which mod you are playing, where soviets seem to have 150 more mp/min to afford all of that without losing map presence in early game? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Spring Update - Balance thread18 Apr 2018, 15:58 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Apr 2018, 13:59 PMRedT3rror Can't wait for my vet2 Tiger 21 pop Tigers to counter it's own (16 pop) counter. apart from that... so many vehicles are getting pop cap updates... but not for the Calliope Inb4 tiger will lose its "new" range buff from previous patch. Jump back to quoted post18 Apr 2018, 15:32 PMsteffenbk1 OKW having also nades delayed is a mistake. Its the only way to deal with early mgs. Without it okw will be stomped early game, since you can just garrison mgs on maps that has houses on fuel points or cutoffs Or maybe now OKW will counter them just like literally all allied factions in early game? By flanking them. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Spring Update - Balance thread18 Apr 2018, 12:29 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Apr 2018, 12:23 PMLago Wouldn't it make more sense to just make the Tank Hunter anti-tank rifles be ineffective against infantry? That'd deal with the versatility issue and would be consistent with every other anti-tank infantry squad in the game save for Guards. Guards are effective vs infantry, because if they weren't, the squad would be utter trash. Call-in squad armed with AT weapon that does not perform well unless spammed and is completely useless vs heavy armor should be effective vs infantry. Why would you get that squad otherwise instead of teching to PIATs and equipping REs with them, creating much more potent and scaling squad? AV tommies should have their AT snare at same range as other snaring squads. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Spring Update - Balance thread18 Apr 2018, 12:10 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Apr 2018, 12:03 PMSiphon X. Well, there is a pattern here with rocket artillery: PW/Stuka: Small target area, only one short salvo, full damage to friendlies Katy/LM/Cali: Large target area, large number of rockets stretched out over a longer period, basically no damage to friendlies. So, seems like they are supposed to do different things. The allied pieces can be used to saturate an area while your own infantry can storm in, the axis ones are good at taking out specific team weapons, but not really for area denial. Now, why all axis rocket artillery is one type while all allied artillery is of the other is beyond me. Might have to do with how the rest of the armies (were intended to) play out... I see your Point, however wipes are wipes. They remove the unit and its vet from the field the same way, regardless of which faction is a target. Either all wipes are bad, which resulted in mortar, AVRE and ST changes, or none are. Selectively nit picking one unit while others share the same problem does not seem to wise to me, especially since blunt generalization of all armies and their performance seems to be the flagship statement of couple of last patches, leaving out exceptions like this one make completely no sense to me. And lastly, I have yet to see a singular Player at any skill or stat awareness level apply allied rocket arty in that way, it just does not work like that in game(as in is not used in such way since its against common sense). That is why I wand Mr.Smith specifically to provide reasoning for what seems like completely random change. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Spring Update - Balance thread18 Apr 2018, 11:53 AM Jump back to quoted post18 Apr 2018, 11:51 AMStark becouse it can easily counter fire and kill the wefer while werfer do shit while firing at katiusha? This for example gives more time to react I think you confused 2 Units. You do realize that werfer will finish its Barrage and will be on way back to the rear lines before katy will finish first inaccurate salvo? Ist Werfer which is able to counterbarrage katy, not the other way around and now its even easier since katy takes longer to deliver barrage. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Spring Update - Balance thread18 Apr 2018, 11:51 AM Jump back to quoted post18 Apr 2018, 11:47 AMullumulu why in the hell will a ost mortar crew die when less than 2model....while the 120mm sov mortar which weights alot more and need much more arm power can survive with one model? never understod that. Ever wondered why wheels were invented? They are made of Magic, they allow single person to move stuff that multiple people could not before. Also quit whining already about everything and anything. 120 Needs 1 model to aim, reload and move because of wheeled cart, while other portable mortars require 2. That's it. If you REALLY want to bitch about something, go bitch on the fact that PACK howi requires 3 People to operate and will be decrewed when 2 people are still there. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Spring Update - Balance thread18 Apr 2018, 11:26 AM Jump back to quoted post18 Apr 2018, 11:19 AMMr.Smith stuff Could you Elaborate on katy nerf but not changing werfer or stuka? Katy was nerfed because wipes, but the other two not while they wipe something with nearly every non max range Barrage makes no sense to me. In: COH2 Balance