Profile of Katitof

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/katitof


Thread: Feedback for Commander Revamppatch1 Oct 2018, 20:28 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Oct 2018, 20:13 PMOsinyagov What the reason for squad with SMG keeping M1 Garand only for smoke grenade? It's really awkward: Can they get normal animation for smoke grenade, like commandos or shocktroops? i am sure americans have normal smoke grenade during WW2. Why? Its called smoke rifle nade. Its got much more range then hand thrown nades, because its being shot from a rifle. In: Lobby
Thread: "balancing" discussions are ALL pointless1 Oct 2018, 19:56 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Oct 2018, 16:03 PMNorthFireZ Wasn't Incendiary Rounds banned for excessive flaming? This just seems like a baiting post to flame either the community balance team or the opinions of the common player. AKA not worth anyone's time. Please, people from all over the world, it is not worth replying to this threat. Move on with your life and keep discussing balance changes Hush, let him do his work, he is perma banned on official and steam forums, his ultimate goal is to get banned on all coh2 forums, now its .org turn, then he'll go for now obscure gamereplays. You know you deal with horribly bad player, when he advocates to ignore pros opinions. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Do volks need some nerf? If so, how?1 Oct 2018, 19:53 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Oct 2018, 13:50 PMullumulu Maybe the brits player should pick the right commander: Commando Regiment which had a winchange from 50%! so its totally ok to lose, when u pick not the meta commander. deal with it. If you advocate picking a commander to counter a stock unit, you reinforce one of the two points - either non doctrinal unit in question is overpowered to the point where doctrine is needed to stand up to it, or units/faction it goes against is underpowered and require buffs. Regardless of which way you pick, you are underminig your own argument, while reinforcing argument that certain factions are underpowered against OKW or volks are just op. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Do volks need some nerf? If so, how?1 Oct 2018, 13:19 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Oct 2018, 12:50 PMVipper I clearly said if ostheer prove to be superior after the revamp patch and that faction should meet halfway. The reason I am saying that is that units have been buffed continuously and soon there will be little time for superior tactics to have a real affect on fights. The benchmark need to be 1 faction not three, it becomes way too complicated if ones attempts to use more than 1 faction as the benchmark. Ostheer used to be benchmark and it makes sense to become the benchmark once more, in addition they are the best design faction that requires the use of different units. If I had to touch the Ostheer I would start with better redesign of commanders, by removing OP combinations of abilities. But that is all my personal opinion. So..... ost is a benchmark. Soviets and OKW line up to it as proven during CGS2. USF and UKF are below by a wide margin as proven during CGS2. And your solution is to nerf 3 in line and balanced factions instead of fixing 2, which are lacking in obvious places? Where is a logic in that? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Do volks need some nerf? If so, how?1 Oct 2018, 13:13 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Oct 2018, 13:10 PMullumulu do u mean the 10 games would have a relvant statistik impact? maybe the player was better trained with other factions? maybe there was no luck from RNG on their side?? you can loose 10games...but the next 90 games u win. When you stop count after the first 10 games..yeah...you are rigth..the need buffs. but if u would look on a relevanz game number,..you would see: they are ok. but ..maybe u troll around like every post. Please enlighten us then, why we have never seen these winning UKF 90 games you talk about during CGS? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Do volks need some nerf? If so, how?1 Oct 2018, 12:24 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Oct 2018, 11:47 AMullumulu in which game was UKF rolfstomp? pls link it. You do realize that faction doesn't need to be stomped to be underpowered? Lose ratio for them screams they need buffs at later stages of the game as well. Unless you believe players suddenly forgot how to play when UKF pick was made and magically regained all of their skills when they played OKW/ost. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to know that if faction got 30% win rate, its underpowered. But that's exactly what happens when you take away all factions gimmicks and crutches holding the faction together while providing nothing at all to compensate. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: What about snares?1 Oct 2018, 09:08 AM Jump back to quoted post1 Oct 2018, 08:55 AMVipper Have you actually played with valentine in the mod? And once more Valentine's efficiency in crushing infantry is problematic regardless of its overall performance. Have you? It can't crush infantry in mod. Please don't spread misinformation. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Looking at USF1 Oct 2018, 08:18 AM Jump back to quoted post1 Oct 2018, 00:56 AMLeo251 I think, maybe, that the main problem is not the USF itself. USF is almost not picked anymore by any top player because Allies has the allmighty Soviet faction. Soviet faction is THE problem of USF faction. Of course that USF can be hard to play sometimes, but, what faction doesnt. OKW and UKF are also really hard to play nowadays. Oh yeah, that 36% win rate on CGS2 is because soviets are OP with their 51% win rate. OKW also must be so hard to play, they only got highest win rate of all factions on CGS2 while UKF got the lowest, so hard to play and poor OKW. Flawless logic. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Feedback for Commander Revamppatch30 Sep 2018, 18:28 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Sep 2018, 18:22 PMTiger Baron And is viable for like what, the first 5 minutes of the match? Soviet clown car is viable for around the same time and guess what? It can still inflict game changing damage/give massive advantage at start. You aren't doing much SPio rushes by the mid game, expecting them to roll over whatever squad you come across, yet it works at start. That's how shock units work, they hit the field, they hit you hard, you get a counter and their potential is diminished. And I don't mind the trade off but the problem is that it also happens to be in 2 other doctrines as well and being an an Armor MG on tracks is certainly a big improvement compared to it's previous state but I still don't think it will be as useful in the long run if it can't reinforce while locked down as well. It couldn't attack anything in any way. It can now AND it can suppress under a circumstance. Its also cheaper/affordable. And you are still not happy. No early game light vehicle below light tanks is useful in the long run and this one is not supposed to be replacement for 251, if you need reinforcement, get 251, not 250. In: Lobby
Thread: "balancing" discussions are ALL pointless30 Sep 2018, 14:38 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Sep 2018, 14:32 PMTiger Baron Want an example? Stuve with the British currently, a person even made a topic about it on here because of his use of Advanced Emplacements Regiment. And how many top players has he defeated so far? Randoms in 1v1 who try to play meta and don't know what to do if opponent does something else then said meta case. In: COH2 Balance