Profile of Katitof

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/katitof


Thread: [POLL] Double Panzershreck for Sturm + AT Fussie 1 Apr 2019, 09:49 AM Jump back to quoted post1 Apr 2019, 09:41 AMTheGentlemenTroll If they had the Guard AT rifles then I could see it be pretty strong. Well, there are BOYS AT sections, which also have AT nade and good PTRS and they aren't really a problem. Given... they aren't 0CP either. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [POLL] Double Panzershreck for Sturm + AT Fussie 1 Apr 2019, 07:53 AM Jump back to quoted post1 Apr 2019, 02:09 AMTheGentlemenTroll I dont think ptrs41 clones would be good on pfus. Penals PTRS are good part because its the only AT options in T1, OKW has t0 at guns and are arguably better LV deterents than PTRS41s. If SOV had a t0 at gun I doubt the ptrs package for penals would get used much. Also Penals still have 4 SVTs on them so they can still somewhat fight infantry. Pfus would have 3 kar98s and would be completely useless against infantry while not being that effective against late game armor. Or you know... they could have IS BOYS/guard rifle AT rifles, which aren't useless vs infantry. Penals are not allowed them, because they would be a complete no brainer unit for soviets, especially considering the fact that maxim and cons are fighting in a pit to see who can suck donkeys balls more(cons at least have some redeeming qualities in doctrines). In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Thoughts on conscripts ? i think they need something.1 Apr 2019, 07:49 AM Jump back to quoted post1 Apr 2019, 04:03 AMdistrofio What if after building T4 cons are trained with vet3 included? Like a "trained troops" mechanic. Stock feature, no doctrine involved. Maybe a little side tech to fit the allied theme. I also want to mention Tric's idea to make cons cheaper to reinforce after each tier is built The problem is specifically late game vet3 cons being redundant and of not much use. There was a failed attempt to fix it by increasing their scaling. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Call-in cooldowns31 Mar 2019, 21:30 PM Jump back to quoted post31 Mar 2019, 21:22 PMddd What are the obvious reasons? Heavy tank in every high level 1v1 game? Go watch tournament that is going on just right now. I hope you're watching it too. Come back reporting how many IS-2s, Tigers and Pershings have you counted(tho the last 2 are fine imo). In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Call-in cooldowns31 Mar 2019, 20:49 PM This.... isn't a half bad idea actually. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Wehrmacht - Strategic Reserves - Feedback31 Mar 2019, 19:42 PM Jump back to quoted post31 Mar 2019, 19:33 PMFarlion After some testing, the Assault Grenadiers still aren't good enough. They take too much damage on the way, and then deliver too little damage to make up for it. They should either be available at a later point and thus more powerful, or should be made to be more similar to Assault Engineers. So... nerf them by removing 6th man upgrade and sprint? They have pretty much the same scaling and exact same target size, but they can get MORE dps and HIGHER durability thanks to upgrade, they also have EASIER time closing in because of sprint. MP40s were also buffed to match other SMGs profiles. In: Lobby
Thread: Thoughts on conscripts ? i think they need something.31 Mar 2019, 19:36 PM Jump back to quoted post31 Mar 2019, 19:32 PMak4000 whats your problem Existence of this thread despite common knowledge that cons are utter trash. There are literally TWO people who think otherwise. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OST Grens31 Mar 2019, 19:28 PM Jump back to quoted post31 Mar 2019, 19:27 PMullumulu Give ost already a positive unique factionbonus like all other faction has...it has no bonus...except you think 4model sqauds are a bonus instead a disadvantage.. (psst, that bonus is all weapon upgrades and grenades are free by default, locked behind time gate only instead of side costs, its also additional tier with units above "T3" level mediums) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Thoughts on conscripts ? i think they need something.31 Mar 2019, 19:26 PM Is this a troll thread bait? I genuinely am confused. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Elephant and Tiger are useless31 Mar 2019, 19:06 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Mar 2019, 13:15 PMButcher The only issue I have with the "Elefant" is that the Ele was nerfed in its performance while the ISU-152 is allowed to wreak havoc against infantry and vehicles alike. 1) As already said, AI is valued lower then AT capabilities(compare cost of 640hp medium AI specialists to medium AT specialists, you'll see a pattern there) 2) ISU has 100 less armor, which is considerable. 3) AP shells have little over HALF the penetration of elephant. 4) Ele deals more damage then ISU. Let me remind you that Ele was nerfed for something that was always beyond ISU capabilities, 2 shotting meds. Ele also roflstomps ISU and ISU have pretty decent chance to bounce against axis late game heavy armor. Ele is well worth its cost for its stats and performance, even compared to ISU. In: COH2 Balance