25)Jagdpanzer IV
-Why is it so expensive? It's outclassed by cheaper SU85. Needs to either have a cost reduction (110 fuel?) or buffed.
Maybe because almost all of its stats are better then "outclassing" SU-85?
26)Tiger
-IS2 vs Tiger is broken. Tiger in general needs front armor buff, dying far too easily to ZiS and SU85.
Tanks die to AT guns and tank destroyers. Its not broken, its supposed to be this way.
IS-2 is more durable, Tiger got more firepower.
Its called balance.
27)Elefant
-Needs a range buff to be brought back from extinction. I don't think a small cost reduction would be bad either.
No, it doesn't. PaK43 does, elephant not.
29)US Heavy Armor
-Not really a 'buff' but the US probably does need a Pershing (along with nerfed E8 to compensate)
No, they doesn't. If anything could be better for US, its indirect fire as PAVK howi is bad, scott is good, but AI only and priest is meh.
30)Grenadiers
-They are getting destroyed too easily by oorah ability, they need something. Maybe slight long or med range DPS buff.
No, they aren't. Cons vs grens are balanced until LMG arrives, then its no competition that good grens become.
32)Stug III G
-This is useless once a Jackson hits the field, it will die to it in 2 or 3 shots. Should see some increased survivability, maybe at the cost of 5-10 fuel.
M3 scout car needs buffs, because german 222 beats it effortlessly. This is how your argument sounds like.
Jackson hardcounters stug, because its supposed to. Jackson is long range AT only, stug is general use assault gun that is good against infantry and medium tanks.