Profile of Katitof

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/katitof


Thread: Sturmoffizier Vet?27 Jun 2015, 07:58 AM Jump back to quoted post27 Jun 2015, 07:46 AMUberHanz haha xD ...i assume from those responses that you guys have no idea why we have this unreasonable situation and you do not care enough to give a fuzz. Well, how could I explain it in the easiest way... Blobs=bad. Sturmofficer=blobs. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: P4 wiping squds26 Jun 2015, 23:25 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Jun 2015, 22:00 PMCieZ People just didn't realize how strong the p4 is because they were all too busy calling in tigers to try anything new. Nothing about the p4 itself changed this patch as far as I remember. Pretty much this. P4 was always potent. Now it can have StuG support for AT and there isn't much in armor department that can contest the combo for cost effectiveness. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: m1919 rifles are overperforming 26 Jun 2015, 21:32 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Jun 2015, 21:03 PMWhat Doth Life?! Defensive stance outside of combat for all LMG wielding units could be interesting. No, it would be dreadfully horrible beyond imagination. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: new patch impression26 Jun 2015, 18:47 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Jun 2015, 18:40 PMAlexzandvar Soviet Mortars are the most accurate in the game so I have no idea what your talking about. The only direct nerf that was given was the reduction to 80 damage for the 120 and it's still a beast. Flares provide a shitload of synergy with infantry pushes. We've told this to you 1000 times and you're still standing firm by your bullshit. Priceless. Soviet and ost mortars have EXACTLY THE SAME ACCURACY. Only BARRAGE of soviet mortar is more accurate. Other then that its 300% slower RoF. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: m1919 rifles are overperforming 26 Jun 2015, 18:20 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Jun 2015, 18:11 PMAlexzandvar Why not give a more interesting vet ability other than "go faster"? Because Relic has said they are going to overhaul all vet ability's for units. As I've said in the past, I'll believe when I'll see. This is the only reason I am hopeful for the next patch. While I don't believe they can fuck things up more then they were in the past(no Quinn, its not a challenge), I also don't believe they can do some amazing stuff, especially with vet1, which WFA armies have only proven further and while there is tad more variety, they went so low as to just slap a raw stat increase for vet1. Can't really be hyped or even optimist for vet overhaul until I see with my own eyes the changes. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: m1919 rifles are overperforming 26 Jun 2015, 18:09 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Jun 2015, 17:17 PMdaspoulos You already know that the current blitzkrieg can't be fixed in that way due to gameplay mechanics On the contrary. Give the activation the same triggers as soviet crew repair have. Done, you can't use blitzkrieg as defensive warp jets, but you can use it preemptively when you are about to engage. Mechanic is there, all they have to do is copy paste it. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why No Maxim Buff?26 Jun 2015, 17:03 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Jun 2015, 16:59 PMJaedrik Relic states that the problems come from the set up and tear down time being incredibly fast, not 6 man squads, not riflegrenades, not anything else. And they're dang right. Well, that didn't stopped kubel from being incredibly mobile, self spotting and effective at aoe suppression. Sets up faster, tears down faster(instant duh), limited suppression on the move. If they think that is fine, there really isn't an excuse for maxim performing so poorly or being equal in cost to MG42. You can't have 2 units of same category and same cost, where one performs awesomely and another one is steaming crap in comparison, yet relic does it all the time, with main inf, with mortars, previously with ATGs now with HMGs. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Patch Analysis (Hidden Changes)26 Jun 2015, 15:19 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Jun 2015, 15:15 PMpigsoup oh nice!. that's pretty smart actually. thx! You have a checkbox to select if you want to see owned stuff or not. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Soviet DSKH is too strong now26 Jun 2015, 15:05 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Jun 2015, 14:54 PMBrutusHR Do you think that mg42 is OP or that DSKH is UP? Or both? In long time im happy about changes on MG and heavy's... IMO I'd say MG42 is too cheap for what it does if we compare stats and effectiveness with DSHK and .50 cal. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Soviet DSKH is too strong now26 Jun 2015, 14:50 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Jun 2015, 14:26 PMnewvan No problemo. MG-42 (vet0) burst duration - 1.5 rof - 16 DShK (vet0) burst duration - 1 rof - 8 Good, now we set up a trap and wait until alex comes here, trying to explain to us all how DSHK is worth 300mp and how MG42 is not OP at all for 240mp and how DSHK is superior MG with most stats lower and higher cost. In: COH2 Balance