Profile of Katitof

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/katitof


Thread: Add a Marksman to USF Recon Company?10 Nov 2015, 13:24 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Nov 2015, 13:19 PMMaschinengewehr And why not? It might actually make people use Recon lol. I use recon. These pathfinders are one of its most powerful units, being able to call-in off-map arty that arrives fast and gives no global warning popup. The one single thing wrong with the doctrine is paradroped combat group which is overpriced because of POS AT gun that doesn't even get crew, meaning you need more then 1k mp, pathfinders and beacon planted to even consider dropping it outside your base. Take away useless AT gun from the paradrop, reduce its cost by AT guns price, MAYBE tweak greyhound somehow and there, doctrine is fixed. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Add a Marksman to USF Recon Company?10 Nov 2015, 12:57 PM How about no? If anything, then what nee said in last paragraph. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: King Tiger 10 Nov 2015, 12:08 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Nov 2015, 11:47 AMJagdfalke You have to agree that SU-76 is too good for its cost though. There's no incentive to build SU-85 at all when you can just sit on SU-76s (which are also way easier to vet up). SU-76 should be a medium tank destroyer and SU-85 the heavy tank destroyer. I'd say that is the problem of SU-85, which got "penal battalion" disease, where cheaper unit does exactly the same what it can do. Medicority of SU-85 in comparison to any other T3 level TD is the problem, StuG is cheap, JP4 have awesome scaling and durability, firefly have alpha strike, Jackson have mobility and reliability and SU-85 is just tad more dmg, tad more durability SU-76 with low mobility. All TDs got updated and SU-85, just like penals in comparison to cons, lags behind because there is something that arrives earlier and does the same thing. Its not that SU-76 is too strong. SU-85 and penals are simply outdated, don't bring anything more to the table then their cheaper alternatives, arrive later and have less utility. Just like nerfing cons all of sudden won't make penals more appealing, changing SU-76 won't make SU-85 more desirable. KT is still a tank. Both SUs are tank destroyers. Tank destroyers damage and kill tanks. In: Lobby
Thread: King Tiger 10 Nov 2015, 11:39 AM Jump back to quoted post10 Nov 2015, 10:53 AMStrummingbird 35 / 375 = 9.33% My mistake, was convinced it was still at 40. In: Lobby
Thread: King Tiger 10 Nov 2015, 10:43 AM Jump back to quoted post10 Nov 2015, 10:36 AMausterlitz @Commissar Katitof, At what range and what % of chance that happens....almost no chance i would say. Over 10% at any range, because 222 don't have pen dropoff at range. 10,7% to be precise. You have fuel cost difference being what? 15 times greater? Su-76 can do it much more often..and at ranges where KT can't shoot back.Compare the pent. numbers. Sure it does. Its a tank destroyer using ZiS-3 gun and having ZiS-3 penetration. You're asking for tank to be immune to tank destroyer. No one's asking for steamroll,but su-76 shouldn't be able to penetrate its armor except at point blank,tulips shouldn't 2 shot KTs and its far too slow to avoid bombing runs. Again, you're asking for a tank to be pretty much immune to tank destroyer. Should IS-2 be too vs stugs which couldn't even scratch its paint job with its guns? And please, show me what math gods guided you to believe that 4x240=1280. JagdTiger is fast enough to avoid bombing runs, KT doesn't have problems with them, unless you try to do it when you see the plane on top of it. In: Lobby
Thread: King Tiger 10 Nov 2015, 10:29 AM Jump back to quoted post10 Nov 2015, 00:17 AMCookiezNcreem Give KT 100 range, 640 damage because fighting jacksons,su85, and slow ass expensive firefly+tulip with a JP fucking 4 AKA the best TD in the fucking game that solos all of those at vet 0 is too much effort. Not to mention it al fucking ready out ranges most mediums and can reach out and slap a Jackson on most maps even with its paltry 45 range. Give KT 1000 front Armor because TOP 3 highest armor value in the game is NOT ENOUGH ARMOR. Also, make KT main gun have twice the AOE, and one shot squads and AT guns even more so than it does currently. But it will still be slow and underpowered! @ostherlitz 222 penetrates IS-2 frontally. Please go make a thread about IS-2 being underpowered because of it. And KT being most expensive doesn't mean it should steamroll over every unit in game, its hardcounters including. In: Lobby
Thread: Why do S mines have signs?10 Nov 2015, 09:50 AM Jump back to quoted post10 Nov 2015, 09:44 AMBananenheld how often do you see them? at my noob elo never and all the games i watched in ocf noone did build one too. so maybe theres a sweet spot between highest skilled and noobs were everyone is building these "fine" mines. Doesn't HelpingHans use them on regular basis? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Stuka zu Fuss10 Nov 2015, 09:49 AM Jump back to quoted post9 Nov 2015, 23:04 PMsiuking666 it had pin-point accuracy and tight high-damage rockets along the line This is the answer for the OPs question. Also, ISG was always more reliable counter to emplacements, because brace. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: panzerwurfers VERY imbalanced9 Nov 2015, 22:37 PM You for real? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Penals weaker than conscripts??9 Nov 2015, 16:43 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Nov 2015, 16:16 PMUGBEAR Make penal the soviet osttroopen, could be perfect And the reason to use them over cons would be...? Because you know, cons are soviet osttruppen. In: COH2 Balance