Profile of elchino7

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

General Information
Steam: 76561198076231535


Thread: Tank balance overhaul21 Jan 2020, 23:10 PM Stun criticals, main gun destroyed, engine damage/destroyed, thread destroyed are NONO. Loader/Gunner/Driver injured, turret lock, T34 ram exhaust engine, maybe. Not for CoH2. An idea to have for CoH3. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 4 men sucks21 Jan 2020, 18:35 PM Made the test (as i was testing other shit), they survive because the Command tank mostly save them (even if you try to replicate low health squads as they were). In: COH2 Shoutcasts
Thread: Tank balance overhaul21 Jan 2020, 18:17 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Jan 2020, 17:22 PMKatitof 10 tries can give you whatever result you are looking for to "prove" your point, regardless how biased it is. 1000 or 10000 will give you accurate result according to balance. Game is balanced with big data, not irrelevant handful of repeats. Please don't talk about numbers if you don't understand how they work. Alternatively, if you don't like that solution, SC2 multiplayer is free for terrans and there always is AoE2. You can get RNGesus on AoE2 by multiple elements. Map creation is really important. Ranged units are not laser units, there's accuracy. Most noticeable with Trebuchets fights. Even more if you account for elevation. There's also monk conversion. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: fallschirmjager units are too broken imo21 Jan 2020, 18:05 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Jan 2020, 08:34 AMSander93 A simple test shows that RA seems to do nothing to slow down suppression. Vet 3 Rangers (target size of 0.57) get suppressed at the same time as vet 0 Assault Engineers (target size of 1). In the same test also a 6 men squad (Paratroopers) gets suppressed just as fast as a 4 men squad (vehicle crew) so at first glance squad size does not seem have a noticeable effect either. The parameters that i've used for the test were the following. Heavy cover in the form of sandbags. Both for aligning models and making changes in suppression more noticeable. I didn't run test in the open or in yellow cover cause i assume that bursts amount would vary little. Also, squads would be invulnerable as to not reduce model count on squads. The problem is that there is no easy way to quantify how much suppression value a squad has. An MG which is perfectly positioned, uses full burst against a single squad approaching, you probably won't notice any difference. The problem is that there is no perfect scenarios. Let me make my point clear: I'm not saying that accuracy is an important factor for suppressing squads but that what we believed to be true (accuracy only matters for AoE suppression and not applying to the individual squad) is not. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: fallschirmjager units are too broken imo21 Jan 2020, 00:14 AM Jump back to quoted post20 Jan 2020, 23:48 PMSander93 Suppression is almost exclusively determined purely by rate of fire and suppression per bullet of the weapon. The RA of the squad it's firing at doesn't really matter (if at all, I'm not sure). Hits apply AoE suppression. AoE suppression seems to apply to the entity itself, therefore it matters. Jump back to quoted post20 Sep 2019, 18:05 PMelchino7 Making a summary: Suppression is supposed to apply to the squad you are aiming, and AoE suppression (which should apply on hits) is what matters for suppressing other squads around the one you are aiming. What is happening. 1- Accuracy matters regardless of individual or multiple squads. This is seen by vanilla tests (units with better RA taking longer to suppress) or by modded cases (testing MGs with 200% and 1% accuracy). 2- Squad size matters as well. Suppression against 4 model is inferior than 6. 3- Multiple squads with few models =/= single squad with same amount of models in total. This means that you can't suppress equally a blob of 6 squads with 1 model vs 1 squad with 6 models. 4- If hits is only what matters to apply AoE suppression, then at 100% accuracy, it should be applying it constantly which is not happening on test. From point 4 and further tests, it doesn't seem to be the case which really confuses me. MG42 (1% acc) shouldn't be suppressing at all the squad behind cover as it's not hitting it at all. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: fallschirmjager units are too broken imo20 Jan 2020, 23:17 PM Jump back to quoted post20 Jan 2020, 18:14 PMKiwiBirb Increase their received accuracy and increase their armour so their durability stays the same, but they get hit by more bullets. This would make them get suppressed faster so they can’t gunner snipe an MG as easily This is the way. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 4 men sucks20 Jan 2020, 21:34 PM Jump back to quoted post20 Jan 2020, 10:18 AMT.R. Stormjäger This is the dumbest base rape I’ve seen in coh2. In: COH2 Shoutcasts
Thread: Second G43 upgrade for Grenadier？20 Jan 2020, 18:11 PM Jump back to quoted post20 Jan 2020, 09:27 AMVipper You are entitled to your opinion but your own sentence, in my opinion, means that conscripts kept receiving buff including the 7 men because vs "STG Volks, were useless." Point is that the LMG grenadier are irrelevant to 7 men conscript. Kinda. Let me explain. I'll separate this in 2 parts. OKW: either pre rework or post rework, Conscripts were not a good option against OKW. Be it Volks, doctrinal units or Obers. Keeping the focus on STG Volks is missing the whole forest. Yes, they were the most recent and biggest issue but ignoring the rest is just failing to see the context on which the change was finally applied. OH: Yes, the LMG is the least concerning point regarding the decision on making the 7 men upgrade. That's why i said that the changes as a whole faction which is a consequence of the power level of how the new factions were released, have given space for Conscripts to receive some kind of late game upgrade. That contribution to space was also done through nerfing most other opening to some degree (Penals, Maxims, Doctrinal units) and AI tools (T70, mines/demo, mortar, KV8, ISU). Cons/Grens struggle equally on late game but for different reasons. This is why in their match up in 1v1 they were fine, but once we incorporate teamgames, thats a whole different issue. Yes, some of those units are still strong. But not strong as to make the whole army composition work around. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Norfside Kharkov19 Jan 2020, 15:19 PM Well...that just happened. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Second G43 upgrade for Grenadier？19 Jan 2020, 15:14 PM OT: Disagree with OP suggestion. In: COH2 Gameplay