Profile of rumartinez89

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 608

General Information


Thread: USF Commander Revamp 202129 Mar 2021, 20:57 PM What about giving the E8 240 armor with no changes to the gun. It would a worse panther in terms of AT and range but would have better AI. In: Lobby
Thread: Upcoming Comander Update - Wishes24 Mar 2021, 16:28 PM Put calvary rifleman/smg upgrade in Rifleman doctrine. In: Lobby
Thread: General USF Commander overhaul22 Mar 2021, 02:35 AM Add thompson upgrade to Rifleman company. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Upcoming Comander Update - Wishes19 Mar 2021, 20:18 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Mar 2021, 17:27 PMProtos Angelus I'll comment only for USF since it's the faction I best know (aside from OKW but I play OKW only casually without the stress) Heavy Cavalry: Pershing armour buff or veterancy rework. The veterancy nade toss is completely useless. Either remove it and return the -50% reload on vet 3 or buff armour and remove nade veterancy. Combined arms: Buff cost and nerf active buffs Rangers: Reduce pop to 9 Rifle company: Bundle flares and sprint and increase CP to 5 or 6. Maybe add mortar halftrack to the company? (or would that be too much?) Recon company: Rework grayhound to some sort of light AT vehicle (there was a thread long ago about the Grey and some good ideas were thrown there). Right now, next to airdropped pak howi and paras; pathfinders, there really is no point in going greyhound. It's not 5CP worth of only AI power. How about combining Sprint with thompson upgrade and calling it CQC training. Allows the commander to focus on rifleman and utility. This would be a regular upgrade so that the calvary rifleman stay unique to it's commander. In: Lobby
Thread: USF Commander - Recon Company rework14 Mar 2021, 16:49 PM How about making Raid tactics a combat focused ability that improves USF light vehicles in different ways. For example the AAHT gets 5 extra range, Stuart/Greyhound get improved reload, M20 gets suppression. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: M8 Grey Hound - Recon Company9 Oct 2020, 19:03 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Oct 2020, 13:15 PMEuan Agree, it's too late to be effective. What's the point of a Greyhound at the same time as a Stuart or Flak HT? You could say it's an AI specialist and could pair well with a Stuart, but the canister ability is severely underpowered, so along with needing an MG upgrade it's a munitions sink just to get any AI power out of it (probably it's like this because CoH1's Stuart cannister shot was so massively OP ). What about making it toggle ammo like the sherman. AI could be the explosive shot like the aaht with no suppression for consistent damage. AT could do stuart level damage with no AOE to bull light vehicles but get beat back by the PUMA In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Suggestion to smooth out tech and diversify late-game12 Sep 2020, 23:15 PM I like the rearrangement but the way you have the units split up it would make captain useless as others have said. If the tech was changed to be more like Osteer(LT to CPT to MAJ) then it would make sense. The biggest issue would be the amount of infantry squads and cost of teching so that it doesn't come to fast. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Making OKW Battlegroup viable12 Jun 2020, 02:40 AM I would think a small bonus would be the way to go. LMG upgrade for Volks or 10% faster vet for Volks/sturms or bolster for sturms/Volks. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Improving the timing of doctrinal vehicles24 May 2020, 16:45 PM Does anyone know why the greyhound is tied to CP and not tech? It seems to come way to late in 3v3 and up. In: Lobby
Thread: USF Airborne Company5 Apr 2020, 12:18 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Apr 2020, 12:11 PMthedarkarmadillo Vet does not carry over. Thanks for answering. How about Pathfinders with better received accuracy at vet 0? I would assume the change in base stats would make them more durable vs the units built at base. In: COH2 Balance