Profile of ZombiFrancis

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 2742

General Information


Thread: Penals are currently unbalanced21 Feb 2018, 23:16 PM And here I remember people like luvnest wreck face with conscripts for years. They're a ton of health to damage, can build green cover that fits the squad, and could deal significant damage over time, albeit inconsistently (hence, requiring time). Then something changed and they were deemed total trash. ...right around the time volks got stgs and a flame nade to invalidate cover. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: My idea to balance OKW21 Feb 2018, 15:55 PM @OP At this stage in COH2's life cycle your best bet is to explore these ideas in the modding section. If there are to be any future patches or redesigns for OKW it's not going to come about from anything said or presented on these, or any other, forums. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Interview CoH technical lead Programmer21 Feb 2018, 15:46 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Feb 2018, 12:19 PMKatitof Can someone explain to this poor soul that they are not still using the very same engine from 15 years ago, because this is not how this works, preferably using programming gibberish? Lul, I see what you did there. In: Lobby
Thread: Some questions about weapon crews and recrews21 Feb 2018, 04:35 AM It is from "Patch version: 23 June 2015 " So it is very, very outdated. In: Strategy Desk
Thread: New Relic Lead Gameplay Designer on aoe 4/coh 321 Feb 2018, 00:26 AM You have to introduce them bit by bit to something you want to ultimately get to. In: Lobby
Thread: RIP RiSiN20 Feb 2018, 15:40 PM Condolences to his family... A terrible loss. In: Fan Clubs
Thread: Ostheer in a Nutshell20 Feb 2018, 15:34 PM Recrewing @ two members is crazy talk innit? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW Heavy Vehicle doctrines and King Tiger20 Feb 2018, 15:10 PM KT really has one job: parking over the key cutoff or VP and blasting infantry squads sent to cap. It's great anti infantry area denial. Its really not the best option for AT. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: OKW infantry anti-tank is not sufficient19 Feb 2018, 17:08 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Feb 2018, 14:14 PMdk828315 Well, I mean if they even consider reading and telling the other guys in their team to look into what the players are complaining/proposing (if the players make some good points, obviously). If they don't then this forum section is pretty pointless. Balance forums are like public commenting periods: It's there to make you feel like you're involved, but has absolutely no bearing or influence on what is actually going to happen. It's gives an idea of how the public feels about the changes that are already going to be made or have been made. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW infantry anti-tank is not sufficient17 Feb 2018, 19:10 PM Unturreted guns tend to rely heavily on support to be effective. For OKW the options to support the JP4 are either fuel intensive, (P4s, Panthers, Pumas from Mechanized, Pak 43 from doctrine.) or are Raketenwerfers or Sturmpioneer panzerschrecks. Thankfully Sturms can lay mines, but those are pretty strictly defensive. And they have no AT mine option like Ostheer. (A reigel mine for IR HTs would've been interesting to explore. Switching mines between axis factions would work too, and also an indirect buff to reigels for ostheer.) And OKW has snares. So comparisons of SU-85s and JP4s or dissections of their stats aside: Is the raketenwerfer as proper an AT gun like the other 4 factions' option? Arguable. It makes up for its shortcomings with cloaking, retreat, and garrison options, but that difference, I think, does leave a gap that no other unit in OKW's arsenal quite covers. It also gives them a rather unique advantage with that cloaking. TBH I think raketenwerfers are more of a doctrinal gimmick than a backbone for a faction. In: COH2 Balance