Profile of Klement Pikhtura

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 772

General Information


Thread: wishlist Last few minor changes before live patch15 Mar 2020, 00:11 AM Mark target is indirect counter to Heavy TD. Heavy TDs should counter ISU. ISU is cancer. But I'd be content if every long range heavy got 5 range nerf, including Elephant and Jagtiger. They are extremely boring both to play with and against. Shocks are too good. Lategame PPSh con upgrade is a buff, 'Tank Hunter' is a buff (gets 2 abilities merged + 1 bonus thematic ability), 'Advanced Warfare Tactics' is a buff (imo). Airborne package - just pure consistency. 60 munies gives 3 PPSh to cons and thus should give 3 to penals. Also I think having 1 CP shocks is kind of ridiculous. I know, penals are not cheap, but still. I'm not insisting on any of those changes. Just few ideas that I think are worth sharing. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: wishlist Last few minor changes before live patch14 Mar 2020, 23:36 PM Reduce 'Armored Vehicle Detection' ability price to 45 (60 is way too much). Light PMD AT mines becomes a part of the PTRS package ability of 'Tank Hunters' doctrine. Tank hunters get 'Armored Vehicle Detection' ability instead. PPSh conscript package give conscripts 0.05 RA reduction. Alternatively gives PPSh conscripts 'sergeant upgrade' for 30 Munies: gives 1 Conscript model PPSh SMG and reduces RA by 0.05, takes 1 weapon slot. Available if 'Mechinized Armor Kampaneya' is built. Airborne weapon drop for penals give 3 PPShs SMGs inline with the PPSh Conscript upgrade. Increase Shocktroops price by 10 and increase reinforcement cost by 2. Increase ISU ammo change duration by 2 seconds. 'Advanced Warfare Tactics' doctrine gets DShK call-in instead of 'conscript repair kit'. Remove 'mark target' from 'Mechanized Support' give 'Conscript Repair Kit' instead. Elephant can no longer be upgraded with a scope. (maybe) reduce ISU HE range by 5. (plz dont permaban me ) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Winter balance mod 2020 V1.311 Mar 2020, 17:14 PM Jaeger Armor - counters armor/TD spam, recon+bombing strike counters arty. I think it is too much. Mechanized Support - counters infantry from long range and, to some extend, armor. ISU should be countered by Pak-43 (countered by bombing strike) and Heavy TDs ("mark target" can be used with great effect against it). In my opinion something has to go, for example both bombing strikes in those doctrines. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: T-34 Ram11 Mar 2020, 14:00 PM I think removing ram from 34/85 and giving it some other ability is a good change. Ability like increasing its moving accuracy by 30%, available at vet 1 costs 30mu. It still won't be on par with what Shermans have, but will emphasize t34/85's offensive role. In: Lobby
Thread: Winter balance mod 2020 V1.311 Mar 2020, 12:00 PM It would be nice to see toning down of "Mechanized Support" (guards + ISU) and "Jaeger Armor" (elephant with a scope) doctrines Mechanized support have 'mark targer' on top of the bombing strike. So it can nuke both armor and arty. Jaeger armor have recon on top of having spotting scopes and bombing strike, which it can use against allied arty and emplacements. You have a lot of armor? No problem I have elephant with a scope. You have arty? No problem i have recon with bombing strike. It is kind of excessive. Particularly these 2 doctrines are extremely toxic in team games and should not have a lot of A+ abilities in their arsenal. TLDR: I think arty should counter long range heavies, but currently such doctrines have bombing strikes to deal with it and some of them even have recon on top of that. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Brummbar change3 Mar 2020, 08:49 AM 4v4 is a closest thing COH2 has to a deathmatch. If you are not playing as a team of 4, it is very casual and not worth stressing about. One thing I wish COH had that could greatly impact 4v4 is doctrine bans, so I could ban every ISU, Elephant/jagtiger doctrine In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why maxim is trash27 Feb 2020, 05:43 AM Jump back to quoted post26 Feb 2020, 19:13 PMWiderstreit Maxim is the only HMG can be spamed effective, because it more or less ignores suppression. So it can perform in situations most MGs suck. Could you elaborate on your point? Because if your MG is getting suppressed it becomes a little bit more useful then useless and not like Maxim won't outsuppress even mg34. Maybe I'm missing something about the suppression mechanics, or something like that. I'm not saying that it should be the case, just curious. In: Lobby
Thread: Why maxim is trash26 Feb 2020, 00:43 AM Could anyone tell me why Maxim's ability needs a reload animation? Why don't maxim get a M1 57mm treatment? It is decent only if you use munies, but reload animation just screws it up. In: Lobby
Thread: Assault Guards M5 HT20 Feb 2020, 09:10 AM Jump back to quoted post20 Feb 2020, 01:40 AMSkysTheLimit The benefit SHOULD be that they can upgrade with 2 elite zooks for 100mu OR 4x tommies for 90mu, and spawn with 6 SVTs. In my humble opinion Makes them unique while being in theme to the commander That would have been great. But AssGuards get 3 M1928 tho. 4 'assault rifle-alike' SMGs is way too much for a squad with 27MP reinforce and the doctrine with decent medium armor. Although I'm kind of curious how in theory Ostheer would deal this doc. M4C decimates P4 and AssGuard does the same to infantry at much further effective range then shocks do. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Winter balance (1/2020) feedback Soviets15 Feb 2020, 01:07 AM Reduce 'armored vehicle detection' price (60 muni for an ability that is worse then recon overflight) at least by 10 and give it the 'Tank Hunters' doctrine replacing those ridiculous PMD mines. I think this ability suits doctrine. Also, is it possible to look at the Land-Lease? For example replacing conscript repair with late-game skill shot like 90 muni 'Sturmovik "Rocket" Run' (the one with the 25mm cannons, not rockets. Advance Warfare Doc has it), or 'IL-2 PTAB anti-tank bommind run' (tank hunter doc has it). Maybe even give it 'Mark Target' instead. In: Lobby